View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2009, 08:17 PM
KS4VT KS4VT is offline
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,224
Send a message via AIM to KS4VT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kf4sek View Post
I find it funny that, if I really wanted to monitor the FHP, or any agency on SLERS, all I would have to do is buy a used EDACS radio and opt for the ProVoice, ESK, and encryption options. It may cost $1200 or so but, I could monitor them, again. And, then let's say I decide to stream the comms on the internet for everyone? They would not be "secure" anymore. No system is completely secure. It just takes someone with a big pocket to give us the comms, again. Eventually, someone will figure that out and then all the money they spent on encryption and the feeling of "secure comms" goes right out the window.

Sure, I can appreciate the fact that they do have it on certain things, such as SWAT at a hostage situation. But, not every statewide agency needs to be "secure," especially when all they do is traffic control at an accident scene or at road construction sites.
That post shows that you know nothing about encryption. Go ahead and waste your $ as you won't hear squat no matter how many options the radios has.
Reply With Quote