[duster]

Originally Posted by 737mech

I don't know if you realize this or not but the Southern NV book publishers and the rrdb people are not the same and in fact the book people are trying to sell something so they do not contribute to the rrdb. As a deterent to copyright they list some freqs or info that is like a trigger and if that info shows up on rrdb they will sue rrdb. So don't go thru the recent edition and post all the differences ok? Just learn to accept different sources for what you want and go from there. I agree I wish the info most current was the rrdb but not in this case. Do you understand?

What I would recommend if you are concerned about RR being incorrect is this: After you have monitored and confirmed any errors in our DB, submit corrections without mentioning in your post where you got your alternate information. If the information is available through monitoring, CloseCall, or other public means, then copyright will not be an issue. If you mention the "other" source in writing, that opens the copyright issue. If you cannot hear any traffic on the frequencies, then perhaps they are the incorrect ones, and may be the 'false flag' frequencies that 737mech was talking about, assuming that is a true business practice (not disputing, just don't have any firsthand knowledge that is done).

Our primary concern is going to be that your information is accurate and is not embroiling the site in a copyright infringement case. We don't need to know the source of your information. We DO need to be able to assume that the submissions have been confirmed by monitoring or another ironclad method (agency list, employee, etc), and we must assume that the information posted here was obtained in a legal manner, unless there are flags raised by the submission.

I hope this provides a little bit of guidance without opening a large can of worms.