View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2009, 10:10 PM
mtindor's Avatar
mtindor mtindor is offline
OH/WV DB Admin
   
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jefferson County, Ohio
Posts: 2,720
Send a message via MSN to mtindor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seligman View Post
I don't know how or why, but the RR database (at least the FCC Search by Frequency db) is making up erroneus locations...
Erroneous location?

1. Those FCC searches are just that - searches of the FCC database, not the RRDB. Do not mistake the two, and understand that what is in the FCC database is under the FCC's control and not RR's control. So, take your finger and point it squarely at the FCC.

2. I don't see a problem. The FCC license indicates that 161.535 is a mobile frequency used in a radius around San Mateo Mexico (location 6).

So, 161.535 mobile frequency (location 9) is paired up with the FB2 frequencies listed on location 6 (160.245 to be exact).

The FCC records are the ones indicating that there is a repeater output (160.245) in San Mateo NM with a mobile input frequency of 151.535.

Mike

Last edited by mtindor; 06-08-2009 at 10:12 PM..
Reply With Quote