View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2009, 03:50 AM
GTO_04 GTO_04 is offline
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,108
Default

I own both and I find the PSR-500 to be more sensitive. However, compared to the 396T, the 396XT has closed the gap considerably and is nearly as sensitive as the 500 on 800 MHz. Everything I monitor is on 800 MHz so I can't tell you about the other frequency ranges. The 396XT is less prone to overload, and that is a major consideration if you are monitoring in urban areas and have trouble with cell tower inerference.

GTO_04
Reply With Quote