RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Service Specific Monitoring > Aircraft Monitoring Forum


Aircraft Monitoring Forum - This is the place to discuss monitoring civilian aircraft communications.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2017, 2:50 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 21
Default BC125AT vs. Yupiteru MVT-7100

Has anyone had experience with these two?

How do they compare with the same antenna on the civil airband?

The Yupiteru seems hard to come by these days.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2017, 5:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: East Devonport,Tasmania,Australia
Posts: 807
Default

I got both main intrest for me is airband only both are excellent performers but i would choose the uniden only cause its smaller in size.

Regards Lino.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2017, 8:16 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 386
Default

To add to Lino's comments. The Uniden is also computer programmable which makes it more versatile. I have a Yupiteru 7100 and would never part with it. However, manually programming 1000 memories is not the most enjoyable process.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2017, 5:18 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Somwhere in South Pacific
Posts: 299
Default

1+ for Uniden mainly due to computer programming, Close Call, better display. Yupi great all round receiver hard to beat but time to move on. Get proper Air Band antenna eg Watson WSMA 901 and free Scan 125 software, it will help.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-07-2017, 8:17 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 21
Default

I have received delivery of a 125AT scanner I purchased, along with the SRH-320A antenna

After unboxing it, reading the manual and using it, I am highly disappointed.

I scanned from 108 to 512 and picked up only 3 or 4 signals during the daytime.

Mind you, I live in a suburban area, near a major metropolitan area -- definitely not the middle of nowhere -- so this is surprising.

At first I thought it had something to do with the squelch or the settings, but, that wasn't the case.

Unfortunately, as far as reception, this scanner's front end leaves much to be desired. I have an older Uniden scanner and compared to that, the 125AT is practically deaf.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-07-2017, 8:34 PM
iMONITOR's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MACOMB, MI.
Posts: 1,021
Default

I had a BC125AT about 5 years ago, and I was not impressed. When compared to my BCT15X base/mobile, the BC125AT failed miserably! I was using the same antenna and location, date, and time, and frequencies. I think there was possibly an actual hardware (not firmware) change back then, but I could be mistaken and that might explain why it didn't perform well.

Most of the reviews are great however. Some swear by them, others swear at them. I may have had a defective one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions