Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Alaska Radio Discussion Forum


Alaska Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Alaska.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 12:04 PM
JerryNone's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 817
Exclamation How does this work?

http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=2447

One site has 800 Megacycles frequencies and all the other sites appear to have V.H.F. frequencies.
Wouldn't the users need to have two antennae? One optomized for 800 Megacycles and the other optomized for V.H.F.?
__________________
"Santa Must Be Polish" By Bobby Vinton.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 12:42 PM
daedalus's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hunterdon County NJ
Posts: 158
Default

I'm far from certain but the following quote from http://www.apco911.org/frequency/sie...nts/alaska.pdf may answer the question:

Deployable Systems
In support of widespread VHF use by responders in Alaska, both federal and state agencies are
employing VHF deployable trunk and conventional capabilities. These transportable systems
consisting of a base station and repeater equipment, trunked and conventional, will be staged at
central locations for response to emergencies. Conventional systems will use frequencies
adopted for nationwide interoperability (Appendix E). These conventional VHF frequencies are
programmed into the user radios to provide interoperability when beyond the coverage area of
the trunking system, both inside and outside of Alaska. These same transportable systems will
also maintain a cache of subscriber equipment to supplement deployed agencies that do not carry
P25/TIA-102A VHF trunked radio capabilities. Further, agencies operating 700 or 800 MHz
infrastructure are highly encouraged to maintain a cache of VHF P25/TIA-102A trunk radio
subscriber equipment to facilitate mutual aid and response outside of their home infrastructure
coverage. Alaska first responders who expect to engage operations outside of Alaska, such as
the fire service should then ensure that they have a communications capability compatible with
systems in other areas of the country.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 01:40 PM
n2mdk's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 2,541
Default

They would not only need 2 antennas but 2 radios as well.
__________________
Jerri

VX-5
FT-60R

Pro-97
BC246T
BC780XLT
BR330T
BCT15
Grundig Satellit 700
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 03:49 PM
wayne_h's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,619
Send a message via AIM to wayne_h
Default

The local agency uses what band they need. It's all just audio paths within the system. It's much more simple than it looks.
__________________
-Wayne
Please contact me via email for a faster response.
Forum Rules and Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008, 04:15 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,045
Send a message via AIM to karldotcom
Default

I am pretty sure Alaska uses HF regularly also.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:48 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryNone View Post
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=2447

One site has 800 Megacycles frequencies and all the other sites appear to have V.H.F. frequencies.
Wouldn't the users need to have two antennae? One optomized for 800 Megacycles and the other optomized for V.H.F.?
Like Wayne mentioned, some agencies use 800MHz and the rest uses VHF. When a VHF user selects talkgroup A and an 800MHz user selects the same one, they talk seamlessly and the trunking sites take care of merging the two together. In the future they will add a bunch of simulcast nodes in the 700 MHz band, collectively known as 'AWARN', that will also interact with everybody on ALMR, virtually making it a 'tri-band' system.
__________________
JETorres

Last edited by kikito; 08-01-2008 at 01:56 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARC250 Settings for Conn. State Police - Will it work? OldHick Connecticut Radio Discussion Forum 5 03-01-2006 09:26 AM
Work for the Media Nwshnd Texas Radio Discussion Forum 5 02-03-2006 04:04 PM
The next step in 911 PSAPS, work at home n4voxgill Tavern Archives 12 08-29-2005 07:47 AM
will the pro96 work with the new rebanding plan mikeh Radio Shack Scanners 1 07-02-2005 05:21 PM
I can't get my 796D to work in Burlington County!! davesdaughter New Jersey Radio Discussion Forum 25 01-01-2005 05:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions