Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Alaska Radio Discussion Forum


Alaska Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Alaska.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2006, 12:13 PM
kl1lt's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: AK
Posts: 37
Default Can't get away from AST

In bank 1 of my Pro-96, I have the Quarry Hill/Eielson freqs in for the ALMR. My problem is that sometimes the radio will start picking up AST traffic that is not part of the ALMR. The screen shows that I am on 155.790 (AST Main), however the transmission sounds like it might be on the wrong freq. It is scratchy. I do not have the AST programmed in this bank and all the other banks are turned off. Anyone know why this is happening?
__________________
Joe
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2006, 12:58 PM
AlaskaRadar's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Pole, Alaska (AK)
Posts: 31
Send a message via MSN to AlaskaRadar
Default

Joe, Are you able to get a short recording of the transmission? I am a little curious about what you may be hearing...like several freqs mixing (just like driving by AST office). I am willing to give my e-mail if you are able to do so. By the way, do you do much with ham radio? I may have to start a new post being that it is off the AST topic.

Radar
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2006, 04:26 PM
AlaskaRadar's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Pole, Alaska (AK)
Posts: 31
Send a message via MSN to AlaskaRadar
Default

Joe, On lunch I heard dispatch tell one of their units that ALMR is 10-8 and to switch to group 9. Maybe what you are hearing is the units on ALMR but the conversion to analog is a little distorted. I will keep listening.

Radar
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2006, 12:07 AM
AlaskaRadar's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Pole, Alaska (AK)
Posts: 31
Send a message via MSN to AlaskaRadar
Default

Joe, If you still hear transmissions on 155.790... It is most likely interference. As of today, AST is now useing 11858 as their talkgroup and NO longer useing analog. As of now, they do not seem to be useing any encryption for basic transmissions. Hope this helps. Radar
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2006, 04:26 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaRadar
Joe, If you still hear transmissions on 155.790... It is most likely interference. As of today, AST is now useing 11858 as their talkgroup and NO longer useing analog. As of now, they do not seem to be useing any encryption for basic transmissions. Hope this helps. Radar
AST did switch to ALMR in the past couple of days. They still use 155.790 occasionally because some units are not switched or confused with the ALMR switchover.

They also started using the old NCIC channel 155.415 as one of the digital voice channels on the Ester Dome site (now is actually used as 155.4125), so you will hear a lot of digital noise on that one if you have it set up to decode PL/DPL tones instead of just plain FM on the Pro-96.

A correction to the talkgroup you posted AlaskaRadar: it's actually 11868.

Here's the most used TG's so far by AST:

11861 - Mostly South (Mat-Su, Anchorage, etc. traffic)
11868 - Seems to be a "patch" of many areas including Fairbanks Main traffic
21862 - Seems to be the new Fairbanks area NCIC channel
__________________
JETorres
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2006, 04:30 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kl1lt
The screen shows that I am on 155.790 (AST Main), however the transmission sounds like it might be on the wrong freq. It is scratchy.
It probably sounds "scratchy" because I think they're Simulcasting in analog and digital while the switchover to ALMR is complete and reliable.

It's the same way with Fairbanks PD Main on the analog 155.010 channel, kind of scratchy and somehow delayed due to the "simulcasting".
__________________
JETorres
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2006, 07:31 PM
kl1lt's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: AK
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaRadar
Joe, Are you able to get a short recording of the transmission? By the way, do you do much with ham radio?

Radar
I don't think that i have anyway of recording it. It hasn't happened at all today and the radio has been on since I woke up. (Boy, does my wife hate that!)

I was really active in ham radio when I lived in Arizona, however up here it seems all anyone does is call their spouse or use the phone patch. I am just a no-code tech but would love to rag-chew with someone. I even set up a CB in the house so I could talk to my son, but that radio took a dump. I will probably go and join the AARC in the next couple of months.

Which site do you North Pole guys use? I was mad for awile at the Ft. Wainwright site because it would not work right. Then I just looked and had all the freqs set to FM. Oops!

When I enter an ALMR freq in, it will change ( 154.7000 will change to 154.70250). Does this need to changed or is it something I have to live with?

Heard this talkgroup yesterday when they were bringing in the next round of Red Flagger's to Eielson.

29214 - ATOC, Air Terminal Operation Center
__________________
Joe

Last edited by kl1lt; 07-15-2006 at 07:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2006, 08:01 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kl1lt
Which site do you North Pole guys use?
On mine I keep Ft. Wainwright, Ester Dome, Eielson AFB, Pole Hill and Peger Rd., all sequentially scanning within the same bank. I also keep other sites that are not within range all the time so that when I'm mobile it'll periodically pick them up.

Quote:
When I enter an ALMR freq in, it will change ( 154.7000 will change to 154.70250). Does this need to changed or is it something I have to live with?
Yep, it's something we have to live with. That band is setup to use the fixed FCC assigned 7.5kHz stepping but as we know, ALMR is using 12.5kHz stepping (thanks to some waivers) which is usually not used or allowed on that band. The Pro-96 unfortunately doesn't allow you to change the stepping like other radios.

Quote:
Heard this talkgroup yesterday when they were bringing in the next round of Red Flagger's to Eielson.

29214 - ATOC, Air Terminal Operation Center

Cool, thanks for the updates and finds.
__________________
JETorres
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2006, 11:57 AM
AlaskaRadar's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Pole, Alaska (AK)
Posts: 31
Send a message via MSN to AlaskaRadar
Default

As for the freeq we use hr in north poel, we use 146.88 - PL103.5. I will find out if there is a site closer to your location that you may use. There is an Interior netmeeting Tonight you are more welcome to join. It is at 8PM on the repeter system.

As for the ALMR repeters... I have all of the control channels on the 2096. I have been able to follow nost of the transmissions with ease. I will post correct TG for ast for they seem to have 2 of them. In correction to anearlier post, One TG is 11868.
Thanks
Radar (KL0RN)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2006, 06:26 PM
kl1lt's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: AK
Posts: 37
Default

Few more talk groups found

29159 Inspector General - Eielson
29059 Special Events - Eielson
29173 Red Flag? (all foriegn voices)
__________________
Joe
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2006, 06:46 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kl1lt
29059 Special Events - Eielson
That one seems to be an additional or secondary channel to the MWR - 29058, maybe?
__________________
JETorres
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions