Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Amateur Radio > Amateur Radio General Discussion


Amateur Radio General Discussion General Discussion Forum for Amateur / Ham Radio Topics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2009, 04:02 PM
kc0vgj's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Independence, Missouri
Posts: 199
Send a message via Yahoo to kc0vgj
Cool N.K. and Ham Radio Operator?

If we go out on north korea and have a full out war with them, if or when they decide to attact hawaii. What rules will the FCC place on use hams?

Last edited by kc0vgj; 06-22-2009 at 04:07 PM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2009, 04:21 PM
rfradioconsult's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 410
Default

With the demise of most of the FCC High Frequency Direction Finding Network; the may appoint stations with the requsite receiving equipment to monitor specific bands to listen for clandestine radio traffic originating by spy's in the U.S. If you haven't done so you may want to purchase a Log Perodic antenna covering 3.5 -30 MHz, install a minimum 80 tower to support the antenna, a suitable high performance HF receiver, a 10" reel to reel tape recorder. Then notify the FCC you are awaiting their orders.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2009, 09:01 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kansas City (Raytown) MO
Posts: 14
Default

I doubt that either I or KC0VGJ really have anything to worry about here in the Kansas City Area. Although rfradio makes a good point, neither one of us even are able to use those HF frequecies.

KC0VGJ if you ever want to QSL contact me on the Raytown Repeater -- 145.1700 --KD0HMI
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2009, 11:49 PM
kc0vgj's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Independence, Missouri
Posts: 199
Send a message via Yahoo to kc0vgj
Default

The reson why i ask this question is that i was reading my old Tech. book and they menchen that in time of war at this level US homeland and N.Korea pointing missle at each other that the goverment could tell us ham's to stop transmitting over the air. I'm not one of those people that are "the wold is ending" type but out of curiosity by reading my book I had to ask.

To KD0HMI i can't reach the raytown repeater becuase i'm in a pot hole. I can reach the O9 repeater.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 12:47 AM
trace1's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Home to the world's largest chair
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kc0vgj View Post
The reson why i ask this question is that i was reading my old Tech. book and they menchen that in time of war at this level US homeland and N.Korea pointing missle at each other that the goverment could tell us ham's to stop transmitting over the air. I'm not one of those people that are "the wold is ending" type but out of curiosity by reading my book I had to ask..
Well until the invoking of the President's War Emergency Powers under the provisions of §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §606 takes place none of us really have anything to worry about. And according to some sources, despite four wars involving the United States since 1952, this has never happened.
__________________
Cha bhi fios aire math an tobair gus an tràigh e.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 04:55 AM
kc0vgj's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Independence, Missouri
Posts: 199
Send a message via Yahoo to kc0vgj
Default

like i said just curios.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 10:16 AM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

The original reason for ordering hams off the air was to provide the government with more control over the spectrum. They can easily order broadcast stations off the air in the event of an impending attack.

However, the premise for all of that and for CONELRAD was that enemy bombers would use radio signals to home in on American cities. Now they can use GPS and other resources that are far more accurate. Also, there are now gazillions of radio transmitters in operation that are unlikely to respond to government directives of any kind, so CONELRAD is no longer possible.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 01:20 PM
kc0vgj's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Independence, Missouri
Posts: 199
Send a message via Yahoo to kc0vgj
Default

ok. Thanks I love history lession. This is why I posted. Now I know why it said this in my book.. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 01:50 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 1,385
Default

While North Korea has its own country prefix for amateur radio, I do not know of anyone who has had a QSO there. With such a closed society, amateur radio may not be a permissable activity and their access to the outside world for equipment, or even adequate funds for even essential commodities, is strictly controlled by Kim Jong Il's tight fist.
__________________
K C 2 P B J
Other useless license information.
List of my out-of-date radios.
Other data that nobody cares about.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 02:23 PM
comsec1's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 105
Default war?

with our current administration in DC I would start worrying about having to learn the korean language rather then using my ham radio.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 04:31 PM
Bill_White's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perry, N.Y. FNØ2xr
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KD0HMI View Post
Although rfradio makes a good point, neither one of us even are able to use those HF frequecies.

You are able to use HF frequencies in accordance with FCC Part 97 section 403 and section 405.
2008 CFR Title 47, Volume 5
__________________
There is no dark side of the moon really, matter of fact, it's all dark.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSR-500 – An Amateurs look at the best of GRE. CalgaryToad GRE Scanners 26 Today 06:53 AM
How do I become a Ham Radio Operator? matthewpd General Scanning Forum 6 10-07-2008 01:52 PM
Ham Radio Operators Are Storm's 'Unsung Heroes' ki4wkm Oregon Radio Discussion Forum 3 12-07-2007 10:45 PM
New ham radio operator firefighterbiddle Nevada Radio Discussion Forum 5 12-03-2006 02:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions