RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Amateur Radio > Amateur Radio General Discussion


Amateur Radio General Discussion General discussion forum for amateur radio topics not covered by the above forums.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2013, 6:16 PM
Fuzy_GSXR1000's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Belleville,New Jersey
Posts: 750
Send a message via Yahoo to Fuzy_GSXR1000
Default Coax cable for feedline?

Today I was in Home Depot and noticed they have RG-6X I think 100 feet for $25.00 and 50 feet for less Is this accepctable for connecting a radio to antenna? I keep reading about RG-8 so I was wondering the lower the number the heavier the wire or copper correct?
__________________
Michael KD2CUD
Radio Shack Pro 197
Kenwood TH-F6A
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2013, 6:41 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,745
Default

The RG# has nothing to do with wire size or copper content. What kind of radio and antenna are you connecting?

RG-6 is 75 ohm general purpose for TV and satellite receivers while RG-8 is a reasonably low loss 50 ohm cable for amateur radio/CB, etc.
prcguy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzy_GSXR1000 View Post
Today I was in Home Depot and noticed they have RG-6X I think 100 feet for $25.00 and 50 feet for less Is this accepctable for connecting a radio to antenna? I keep reading about RG-8 so I was wondering the lower the number the heavier the wire or copper correct?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2013, 7:51 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 623
Default

It depends what you plan to do with the cable. If you're simply connecting a receiver, the RG6 will work. If you want to transmit, you'll need something that has the same impedence as the radio and antenna, eg. RG8.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2013, 8:50 PM
Fuzy_GSXR1000's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Belleville,New Jersey
Posts: 750
Send a message via Yahoo to Fuzy_GSXR1000
Default

Thanks guys yes it would be to transmit as well as receiving!!!
__________________
Michael KD2CUD
Radio Shack Pro 197
Kenwood TH-F6A
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2013, 9:39 PM
N8IAA's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Fortunately, GA
Posts: 4,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzy_GSXR1000 View Post
Thanks guys yes it would be to transmit as well as receiving!!!
Depends on the frequencies, too. But, RG-8 and RG-8 mini will work well with longer runs on HF, and shorter runs on VHF/UHF.
Larry
__________________
Digital/Analog scanning and hamming
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
        
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2013, 11:56 PM
Ed_Seedhouse's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 353
Default

75 ohm cable into a 50 ohm transmitter gives an SWR between the transmitter and the cable of 1.5 to one, if I recall my introductory course correctly. This is really not very much and might work OK depending on the transmitter, power, and the match at the other end to the antenna. A 1.5 to one SWR gives a transmission loss of 0.18 db according to the chart at this site: VSWR

If your transmitter has a transmatch built in, as many commercial HF rigs do, the SWR can be bought down to 1:1 anyway.

Less than 0.2db due to impedance mismatch is surely inconsequential loss and for instance common RG8X has a loss at 100mhz of 3.6 db per 100 feet vs only 2 db per 100 for RG6. So the SWR loss may be paid for by less loss on the transmission line depending on the situation.

Common cables transmission loss table here: http://www.w4rp.com/ref/coax.html

Last edited by Ed_Seedhouse; 03-09-2013 at 11:59 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2013, 10:10 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 623
Default

True, 75 ohm cable can be used as it will show a slight mismatch when being used with a 50 ohm system.

It's just easier to recommend 50 ohm cable and avoid the esoteric discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2013, 10:23 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,643
Default

There are three thing to which coax cable to use. It's characteristic impedance, it's losses, and cost. Part of one of those things is the ease in putting connectors on it too. Most commercially made 'ham' equipment uses a PL-259/SO-239 connector. They can be put on RG-6 but not very easily (for me). That's the biggest reason why I don't use it, along with it being 75 ohm instead of 50 ohm impedance.
If you wanna try it, do so.
- 'Doc
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions