RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial, Professional Radio and Personal Radio > Budget and Entry Level Transceivers


Budget and Entry Level Transceivers - For discussion of budget or entry level radios such as Baofeng, Wouxun, Puxing and other radio communications designated as commercial but not targeted for Amateur or GMRS. Also included are MURS and ISM 900MHz designed radios.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2017, 12:49 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Camden County South Jersey
Posts: 232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khaytsus View Post
Not that anyone would actually get in trouble for it, but there is also a thing called aiding and abetting.
I'm not sure what that means
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2017, 2:53 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Lowestoft - UK
Posts: 220
Default

On all radio forums - I personally think that the legal status of using radios should always be mentioned to new users, who understandably may have just ordered a radio from Aliexpress and used it on whatever was in it, and knows nothing about the legality for where they live. Once they know - assuming that the radio is not set to something silly like 121.5, 243, 156.8 then for many people, even in my tiny country, they really are not going to involve flashing lights and handcuffs, but like the speeding and other examples, are illegal. Once understood, we then move on to technical stuff, legal job done.

It's pretty clear from my own experiments that my Amateur spec Icom IC-32 dual band performed amazingly well in the narrow ham bands. My expansion of it to cover wide on VHF and UHF simply showed how the filtering really was tight on the ham bands where the design was aimed. My commercial UHF Icoms of that era were even tighter, on the brand new 12.5KHz spacing. If a signal was even slightly too wide, being from a 25KHz channel system, it would simply mute the audio. These radios still work and perform far better than the brand new Baofengs I have on the shelf for disposable jobs. The Icoms are more sensitive, reject adjacent channel signals and suffer far less from intermod products. However - in 1985 or so, these things cost more than a weeks pay. Translate that to today and Baofeng price, and what do we expect? Seemingly amazing performance, and it just cannot happen.

For critical radio systems I buy expensive Japanese brands through choice, but for people crashing through woodland with paint ball guns, using expensive radios is pointless and to be frank - stupid.

What was the old phrase? Horses for courses? Right product for the appropriate scenario.

We should stop slamming Baofeng - because they are the current introduction to the hobby, and amazingly good value. Of course they are cheap, cheerful and technically compromised, but you can buy one for the price of a MacDonalds meal! What do we expect?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions