![]() |
Grass Valley PD Dispatch freq
Has there been some change to Grass Valley PD's dispatch frequency, 156.000? My nephew there is no longer hearing the dispatch side, but is getting intermittent static. Listening over the phone, I don't think it was encryption kind of noise, just mild static.
He's hearing the mobiles just fine on 158.775, but apparently dispatch doesn't TX via the uplink freq.... presumably going by landline or microwave up to the transmitter. He also hears the tac freq 155.94, and everybody else up there (SO, CHP, CalFire) except the dispatch side of GVPD. He's right in GV, so even if it's mild RFI, he should be hearing them I would think. This started happening in the past couple months. Change in frequency? Encryption? Voodoo Electronics? Thanks |
Quote:
It sounds like they might have changed their repeater output frequency, but the input is still on 158.775 mhz. Tiime to use the search funtion on his scanner and locate a frequency on the same band, where he can hear both sides of the conversation. I would also try another scanner and make sure that the first one isn't bad. Computers can generate RFI, but this would affect other rigs tuned to the same frequency... |
I'm hearing GVPD on 156.000 from my office in Nevada City. It's a little noisy, but I'm using the stock "rubber duck" antenna in an office building full of electronics. So, the noise is probably on my end.
Maybe confirm that your nephew hasn't changed the squelch by mistake. If his scanner can decode digitally coded squelch (aka DCS or DPL), it should be set to 466. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can hear units close by (a few hundred yards) without an antenna on my scanners at all. |
156.000 dc:466
I hadn't heard this frequency active in a while, but I am not exactly next to Grass Valley and I have not been at home monitoring all the time anyway. But tonight they came in loud and clear on 156.000 DC:466.
|
From http://www.napco.org/freqlogs/100212fl.pdf
13-Dec app pending grass valley grass valley 155.6550 To replace 156.000 50 w erp 160 aat 841 msl 23 agl. To abate an interference issue. Pw/apco |
500 watts sounds like a typo
grass valley pd gets their interference from brentwood or oakley i believe |
Quote:
When I've been in GV and heard interference on 156.00 they ID'd as "Solano" (fire, I guess), and while it was an annoyance it didn't come close to really interfering with the GVPD units and dispatch hearing each other. But those foothill towns/counties have a lot of territory they overlook, so they do need to have good coordination. I ditch-patched for them in the early 80s, and we'd occasionally get skip from Costa Mesa PD's helicopter (and someone in Colorado) on 45.08 until we finally moved to 45.22. Then we never heard from anybody... including our own portables if they weren't right downtown. :roll: Later they went to a low-band repeater before moving up to VHF-high. |
For what it's worth I heard them on 156.00 DPL 466 back in late January with a mobile VHF antenna on Hwy 80. :) They were still really noisy. I'm glad they have that new app in, it was definitely not the best idea to try and share frequencies with Solano County Fire!
|
156.000
Quote:
During a recent trip to the southern part of the state I had 156.000 programmed with no tone, as the agency I wanted to monitor was CSQ. I ended up having to lock out the frequency for most of my trip as it sounded as bad as low band with atmospheric noise. Considering that I am only at 300' above sea level, I am sure GV can pick up Solano Fire just fine. I have also picked them both up when traveling in the Sierras. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger