RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > California Radio Discussion Forum

California Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of California.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 3:17 PM
oregontreehugger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,166
Default Susanville / Lassen Co. freq list found...

While searching the internet I stumbled across this pretty comprehensive list for Lassen County, Susanville, Plumas County, and the surrounding areas:

http://www.susanvillestuff.com/scanner.html

I have no idea how recent the data is, although it lists Reno PD and Reno Fire on their old UHF system, which was a few years ago.

Luckily rural areas don't change that fast.

Enjoy!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 10:36 AM
Exsmokey's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: On a map: the right side of California
Posts: 2,978
Default

I took a quick glance through the first 5 pages or so and there are a lot of errors. I don't know the local stuff very well, but do know the BLM, Forest Service, and Fish and Game systems well enough to say that about half of what is listed is incorrect. The site lists repeater input frequencies which are of very limited utility, the uplink UHF frequencies have changed, and much of what is listed is just incorrect. Some of the frequencies listed appear to be images someone received at one time. Some of the frequencies are not even frequencies given the spacing for that frequency range.

I have often found that scanner frequency lists on travel or chamber of commerce type websites are full of errors. Some far worse than local Radio Shack lists often are. When I first started surfing the web I would put a fair amont of time in sending them corrections and found that the webmasters either didn't appreciate it or would feel that my knowledge was not as good as the locally provided information and would go on listing frequencies I knew were not valid.

__________________
Started out as a "donnowhatiwannabe," moved on to a "wannabe," became "abe" and now I'm a "wasabe."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2006, 11:03 AM
oregontreehugger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,166
Default

Hmm... in that case, not such a good list then.

Thanks for catching the errors!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions