• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

coax myths???

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stites

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
16
Hi yall, haven't been on in awhile. Anywho, I've heard things about coax cables having to be 18' long to work right, that their length has to be a multiple of 3', that you need to run 75-ohm cables for duals and 50-ohm for singles, stuff like that.

Any truth to it all? Tried searching, but the search engine won't work on my phone.
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
The 18' myth is part true and part false. That length isn't really critical, but due to resonance, it does help a SWR meter read a lower value (although the true SWR will not change depending on the coax length). This is because most SWR meters read voltages and this length will provide the lowest voltage at CB frequencies. Those 3' lengths are similar, tapping into lengths where lower voltages may appear.

The typical CB antenna is designed to work at a 50 ohm impedance so normally you should use 50 ohm coax. A phased array of two antennas (those trucker dualie antennas) must be phased to work correctly and specific lengths of 75 ohm coax from each antenna to the combiner will properly phase them for a front-to-back gain (with loss to the sides) and provide the radio with the desired 50 ohm match.
 

MBill

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
168
Stites,

You may want to go to the Firestik site. They make CB antennas and have quite a bit of
information in their "Tech Help" section, all related to CB antennas, cables, installs, etc.
I believe they cover the 18' issue, etc.
 

jackj

Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Messages
1,548
Location
NW Ohio
18 feet is a half wavelength at CB frequencies so a transmission line of that length will reflect back to the transmitter the exact match that appears at the antenna. So your SWR meter will read the same at the transmitter as it would read at the antenna. As N5IMS points out, a SWR bridge reads voltage and will only give accurate SWR readings when placed at half wavelength intervals along the transmission line. That is the main problem with using a SWR bridge to tune an antenna.

A better device to use is a directional watt meter. You can set it to read forward power or reflected power and the reading will be accurate no mater how long your transmission line or where in the line you insert the meter. There are several manufacturers who make directional watt meters but they are more expensive than a SWR bridge.
 

cmdrwill

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
3,984
Location
So Cali
You can get low VSWR readings even with a bad antenna by cutting the 50 ohm coax cable to the 'magic' length. Even tho the VSWR or reflected power is at a minimum, the antenna still does not work. You can even 'tune' a short circuit or even a open circuit by cutting the cable to that magic length.

IF the antenna is 'tuned' and resonant then the cable length does not make any changes.

Been there, Did that way back in the 60's,
 

mikewazowski

Forums Manager/Global DB Admin
Staff member
Forums Manager
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Messages
13,531
Location
Oot and Aboot
That was actually a job interview question for me many years ago.

If your VSWR is 1:1, does that mean you've got a perfect antenna system?

My reply was no, all it means is that the antenna system is presenting itself as a perfect match. Doesn'd tell you anything on how well your signal is radiating from the antenna. A dummy load should give you a good VSWR but it sure doesn't radiate very well.
 

Stites

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
16
Cool info, thanks yall!

I was actually going to get a Firestick before a guy at work cut me a deal on the Francis whips I have now. I'm quite happy with them, just want to get the most out of them that I can. Next step will likely be steel whips, though I'm in no real big tizzy to do it.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The 18ft length is a myth. It might be around a half wavelength in free space at CB frequencies but that does not take the velocity factor of the coax into consideration.

If an antenna has a perfect match at the feedpoint, a half wavelength in coax will repeat that match but with velocity factors running between about .66 and .85 for most modern coax, a half wavelength in coax could land between 11.88ft and 15.3ft. Not 18ft.

If you look at any mobile antenna mount sold with coax for any frequency from 1.8Mhz to 900MHz, they just about all come with 18ft of coax. That's to reach any reasonable part of a vehicle without running too short or costing the mfr extra $$ in wasted coax. Period.

For dual CB antennas its a different story and two identical runs of 75 ohm coax that are odd multiples of a 1/4 wavelength with velocity factor included will make a power divider for the frequency of interest. Most dual CB antennas are sold with a 75 ohm coax "phasing harness" that is simply a power divider that matches the two 50 ohm antennas to the 50 ohm radio. If you want a phasing harness for a band different than CB then its dimensions will be different.
prcguy
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Did you get the job?
prcguy

That was actually a job interview question for me many years ago.

If your VSWR is 1:1, does that mean you've got a perfect antenna system?

My reply was no, all it means is that the antenna system is presenting itself as a perfect match. Doesn'd tell you anything on how well your signal is radiating from the antenna. A dummy load should give you a good VSWR but it sure doesn't radiate very well.
 

Stites

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
16
If an antenna has a perfect match at the feedpoint, a half wavelength in coax will repeat that match but with velocity factors running between about .66 and .85 for most modern coax, a half wavelength in coax could land between 11.88ft and 15.3ft. Not 18ft.

So does the velocity factor need to be calculated based on the parameters of a given coax? Or is it readily available on the cable itself? I've bought a 12' coax before( cut to make two 6' cables, was a total noob back then), but I've never seen a 15' one.

I guess the true resonant length depends on what channel you run too, eh?
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
You can usually look up the velocity factor on the coax mfrs website. Most newer foam dielectric coax is in the 75 to 85% range and older coax with solid clear dielectric is usually around 66%. You shouldn't be worried about coax velocity factor or length unless your making a phasing harness or splitter for two identical 50 ohm antennas with 75 ohm coax.
prcguy

So does the velocity factor need to be calculated based on the parameters of a given coax? Or is it readily available on the cable itself? I've bought a 12' coax before( cut to make two 6' cables, was a total noob back then), but I've never seen a 15' one.

I guess the true resonant length depends on what channel you run too, eh?
 

SouthernRoller

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
559
Location
Crumpler,NC
So basically for a single mobile ant, all that is needed is whatever length it takes to get from the radio to the antenna? Correct?
Also is it better to check SWR at the antenna or the back of the radio?
 

JayMojave

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
722
Location
Mojave Ca
Hello Dump Trucker: Yeah what ever length that will reach, most antennas come with 18 feet to allow a long hook up I believe.

Its way easier to measure the SWR at the radio, as measuring it at the antenna would be a pain. Measuring the SWR at the radio end of the coax will show you just what the radio is seeing in SWR and is a valid ok way of measuring the SWR, and will indicate a valid ok condition or antenna coax problem.

Jay in the Great Mojave Desert
 

wa1nic

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
263
Location
Westfield, Ma
It is best to check the SWR at the antenna base, and not with an SWR meter but instead with an impedance analyzer.

If you have a non-reactive input impedance of say 40-60 ohms you will be good to go. You wont get that with a short antenna. You will only get that with a 7-9 foot antenna (9 foot being preferred). With a significantly shorted antenna, to get "50 ohms", you have to use a coil of some sort to add inductive reactance. Inductive reactance does not radiate.n "SWR METER" cant tell you if the antenna is reactive or not.

A better way to make a shorter antenna work is to still tun for resonance, giving you a lot lower than 50 ohm input impedance, but then use a matching transformer to step the impedance up to 50 ohms. You can make one with a ferrite torroid and some wire, or you can by a switch adjustable one from MFJ.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Not a lot of folks have an impedance analyzer and especially CBrs. Yes its good to know the SWR at the base of the antenna as a sanity check but in most cases the antenna, the coax and its surroundings makes up the "antenna system" and I would go for the best SWR at the radio and not specifically at the antenna base.

If the SWR at the antenna is slightly different than that at the radio but you have the lower SWR at the radio and the SWR is stable when you move your hand up and down the coax, then go with the adjustment that gives a better SWR at the radio end. With mobile CB antennas its not very practical to measure the SWR right at the antenna anyway and I would only do that when investigating an antenna problem.

When a really short CB antenna will not match then applying tricks like a shunt matching coil at the base or using an impedance step down transformer as wa1nic suggested will help but again most CBrs don't have that or the expertise to fine tune a shunt coil. In the case of a short antenna that will not quite match or with an antenna with inadequate ground plane its much easier to fool it with a small value capacitor across the base of the antenna. Usually something in the range of 20 to 50pf does the trick and will allow you to get a good match.
prcguy

It is best to check the SWR at the antenna base, and not with an SWR meter but instead with an impedance analyzer.

If you have a non-reactive input impedance of say 40-60 ohms you will be good to go. You wont get that with a short antenna. You will only get that with a 7-9 foot antenna (9 foot being preferred). With a significantly shorted antenna, to get "50 ohms", you have to use a coil of some sort to add inductive reactance. Inductive reactance does not radiate.n "SWR METER" cant tell you if the antenna is reactive or not.

A better way to make a shorter antenna work is to still tun for resonance, giving you a lot lower than 50 ohm input impedance, but then use a matching transformer to step the impedance up to 50 ohms. You can make one with a ferrite torroid and some wire, or you can by a switch adjustable one from MFJ.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top