RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Illinois Radio Discussion Forum > Chicago Metro Area Discussion

Chicago Metro Area Discussion Forum for the discussion of Chicago Metro Area related topics in the State of Illinois. Please post ANY Chicago related posts here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 1:04 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,231
Exclamation Chicago Granted a 2 Year Narrowbanding Wavier by FCC

The city applied for an 2 year narrowbanding waiver in May, which was granted by the FCC. The waiver affects numerous VHF and UHF frequencies throughout the city used by Medical response teams, Street and Sanitation, and VHF conventional stand-alone systems. They now have until January 1, 2015 to narrowband the affected frequencies. The full text of the waiver, including the specific frequencies covered by it, can be found here in PDF format:

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-12-2079A1.pdf
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 2:35 AM
redneckcellphone's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: southern comifornia
Posts: 328
Default

I thought the FCC was very clear that they gave enough time for people to narrowband?


Sent from my iPhone yes iPhone using Tapatalk app thingy
__________________
Connor - WQND300
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 8:58 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redneckcellphone View Post
I thought the FCC was very clear that they gave enough time for people to narrowband?
It helps if your Mayor is the former Chief of Staff for the President of the United States.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 9:32 AM
mmckenna's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SNCZCA51
Posts: 2,588
Default

It also helped that they put their waiver in back in May, rather than waiting until December. FCC made it clear that they would consider waivers on a case by case basis if they were submitted in a reasonable amount of time. They also made it clear that filing for a waiver at the last minute wasn't going to fly.

If you read the FCC document:
"The record shows that Chicago has taken concrete steps to meet the commission's January 1, 2013 narrowbanding deadline, including narrowbanding a large portion of its current system and securing funding of the remainder of the transition process."

It also states that the city of Chicago only employs 16 radio techs, and due to economic downturn, they cannot hire more.

These sorts of situations are exactly what the waiver process is for. It isn't because Chicago was lazy and waited until the last minute, which the FCC is clearly targeting, but constricted by system size, complexity and economic hardship.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 6:33 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago,Il.
Posts: 76
Default

I'm sure that the Mayor of Chicago was Chief of Staff has nothing to do with it.
__________________
Unauthorized use of "Public Safety" frequencies is a federal crime...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 8:26 PM
mancow's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N.E. Kansas
Posts: 4,582
Default

"Too big to fail"
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 8:56 PM
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 11,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oemctx4 View Post
I'm sure that the Mayor of Chicago was Chief of Staff has nothing to do with it.
Correct. Too many conspiracy theories out there. Reality must be too boring
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 9:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 702
Default

I've often wondered what would happen if the bigger systems like New York, LA and Chicago had told the FCC to take a flying leap.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2012, 10:26 PM
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 11,438
Default

They'd be paying up the wazoo, and would eventually have the courts forcing them to dismantle their equipment.

That would be tough for their mayors to explain to their residents. Lots of local politicians would be looking for new jobs!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2013, 1:05 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,032
Exclamation City gets FCC waiver

Peoria granted federal extension as it nears launch of new emergency dispatch system - Peoria, IL - pjstar.com
__________________
Bob Reynolds-WB3DYE
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2013, 5:44 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale View Post
They'd be paying up the wazoo, and would eventually have the courts forcing them to dismantle their equipment.

That would be tough for their mayors to explain to their residents. Lots of local politicians would be looking for new jobs!
I doubt that. If you had cities combined representing 20 or 30 million people or more standing up to them, the FCC would have some 'splainin' to do trying to justify forcing agencies to spend millions of dollars so bandwidth could be sold to private companies.

Might even cost some of the Commissioners their jobs.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2013, 7:37 AM
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 11,438
Default

But that's not the only reason for the narrowbanding move. It's better for everyone in the long run.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2013, 5:42 AM
N9JIG's Avatar
Master of my domain
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,148
Default

The FCC has been very clear about it's narrow band waiver process. Given that there was over a decade's worth of warning and a multitude of notices put out the waivers they have issued have been very specific and relatively few in number.

The applicants must have a specific timeline, compliance plan and background reasoning to obtain these waivers and each was scrutinized individually by both the FCC and coordinators before they were approved.

Many more were denied, usually because there was not sufficient reasons for the delay or no specific plans to move forward.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chicago, illinois, narrowbanding, waiver

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions