Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Colorado Radio Discussion Forum


Colorado Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Colorado.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2009, 11:46 PM
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glenwood Springs, CO
Posts: 124
Send a message via AIM to n0nhj Send a message via Yahoo to n0nhj
Thumbs down More Encryption

Appears that San Miguel County SO has started using encryption on it's main dispatch channel now. Passing through today, dispatcher was in the clear, field units were encrypted.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 12:52 AM
jimmnn's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,592
Send a message via ICQ to jimmnn Send a message via AIM to jimmnn Send a message via MSN to jimmnn Send a message via Yahoo to jimmnn
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by n0nhj View Post
Appears that San Miguel County SO has started using encryption on it's main dispatch channel now. Passing through today, dispatcher was in the clear, field units were encrypted.
Lots of corruption to hide in Telluride I guess.

Jim<
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 06:01 AM
poltergeisty's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: From RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
Posts: 2,327
Default

Well at least dispatch isn't encrypted. Unless they're testing to make sure all is good before making that enc. too. Then it could be they simply ran out of money. Which brings me to another point. with the shty economy, how the hell can a department afford this? I guess Telluride has more funds or excess funds they had to spend???

Wow! The 2000 census shows the population at a little over 2200!? Are you kidding me!!!
Telluride, Colorado - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Sense when did Congress take the Hippocratic oath?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 08:09 AM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,450
Default

ADP encryption is cheap like a $10 $15 flash per radio as mentioned in various discussion here in the past so what's an extra grand or two to hide everything from the populace and the "Damn Media".

With this pattern of new agencies jumping onboard the DTRS bandwagon with ADP I'm wondering if those super anxious for Longmont to ditch VHF could potentially be faced with a major disappointment.

The Greeley Trib mentioned recently that part of the federal stimulus money for Greeley will be used for new radios. Considering 3 of the 7 PD groups have encryption on demand already and their portables are ADP capable one might wonder.

"Interesting Times" are here.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 02:26 PM
lostguy's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canon City Colorado
Posts: 142
Default

I was told that here in Canon City that the radios came with that lovely feature for basically nothing..talk about almost nothing to listen too.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 04:13 PM
n0nhp's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grand Junction
Posts: 208
Send a message via Yahoo to n0nhp
Default

Montrose PD is using encryption too. Dispatch as well as mobiles.
I guess that the listening public is too dangerous.

Bruce
__________________
N0NHP

Online Scanner http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?ctid=279
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2009, 11:29 PM
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Castle Rock, Co.
Posts: 153
Send a message via AIM to 04Z1V6 Send a message via Yahoo to 04Z1V6
Default

TG 1868 Lone Tree PD channel one seems to be also. I had it programmed on my feed radio and it sounded encrypted. I had to lock it out.
__________________
Pro-2096
Pro-106
Pro-197
Scanner feed provider : http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?ctid=258
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2009, 02:22 AM
datainmotion's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n0nhp View Post
Montrose PD is using encryption too. Dispatch as well as mobiles.
I guess that the listening public is too dangerous.

Bruce
According to the Montrose PD radio tech - the Drug Task Force was tired of finding P25 capable scanners in houses they raided. So the logical step for them, was to encrypt everything.
__________________
Denver International Airport - Public Safety Online Scanner

Travelling to or through Colorado? Click here
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2009, 11:30 AM
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Castle Rock, Co.
Posts: 153
Send a message via AIM to 04Z1V6 Send a message via Yahoo to 04Z1V6
Default

As much as like to listen to special groups like the drug task forces I understand if they go encrypted.
__________________
Pro-2096
Pro-106
Pro-197
Scanner feed provider : http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?ctid=258
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2009, 08:50 PM
datainmotion's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,147
Default

Me as well - no arguement there. Its when dispatch gets encrypted for no demonstrably good reason that I have an issue with it.
__________________
Denver International Airport - Public Safety Online Scanner

Travelling to or through Colorado? Click here
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2009, 09:03 PM
dracer777's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lafayette, CO.
Posts: 425
Default

Same here, in greeley, i liked the system they had, all(most) tactical(covert ops and sting ops) were encrypted. Car-to-car, dispatch, and clearance were clear. <-----encryption like it should be used.
__________________
_/\_"Smart" is understanding how ignorant you really are_/\_

Psalm 23:4 "Even though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me...."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009, 01:05 AM
ColoradoRedlands's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 281
Send a message via AIM to ColoradoRedlands
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by datainmotion View Post
According to the Montrose PD radio tech - the Drug Task Force was tired of finding P25 capable scanners in houses they raided. So the logical step for them, was to encrypt everything.
Im not sure what that has to do with it, the DTF has an encrypted TG of their own since they have been on DTRS. Having the PD and the SO patrol operation being encrypted would have very little affect on what the DTF does.

But worse; why-oh-why does any Fire Dept need to be encrypted at all, as in Garfield Co.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009, 07:38 AM
poltergeisty's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: From RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
Posts: 2,327
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoRedlands View Post
But worse; why-oh-why does any Fire Dept need to be encrypted at all, as in Garfield Co.

The, literal 50,000.00 dollar question! If not more $$$$.

Mind blowing!

Unless they go with ADP of course...
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009, 08:45 AM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,450
Default

One way to look at it ADP costs way less than DES or an EDACS Pro-voice system.

ADP does go against the general P25 concept as in not being an open encryption standard (proprietary).

Someone posted awhile back that Greenwood Village intends to go full ADP in the future.

Also more motoTRBO conventional is showing up in this area for business radio. The only public safety agency using TRBO so far is the Weld County Jail.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2009, 09:47 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Buena Vista, Colorado
Posts: 5
Default

Motorola made a brilliant sales move..

Sell everyone on ADP.. Charge $10 so they can't refuse..

Then they are forever locked into buying Motorola radios... No Tait/EFJ/Harris radios ever. ADP is Motorola''s property.

Add on to it that most state agencies DON'T have ADP capable radios, DOW/CSP/CDOT so no state agencies can talk directly to an ADP agency easily..

Forget about scanners, for those reasons alone ADP should be banned.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2009, 09:33 AM
poltergeisty's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: From RLG, Fly heading 053, intercept 315 DVV
Posts: 2,327
Default

So the way it looks the next interoperability issue will be with encryption.

APCO?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2009, 03:19 PM
dracer777's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lafayette, CO.
Posts: 425
Default

Wirelessly posted (MOT-QA30/00.72 UP.Browser/7.2.7.5.610 (GUI) MMP/2.0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by poltergeisty
So the way it looks the next interoperability issue will be with encryption.

APCO?
Hahaha! Never thought about that, hopefully, we will have a large fire and mutual aid is requested from a fully encrypted FD. Either that would result in the state making encryption mandatory for every DTRS radio or getting rid of unneeded encryption, hopefully the latter.
__________________
_/\_"Smart" is understanding how ignorant you really are_/\_

Psalm 23:4 "Even though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me...."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2009, 03:37 PM
jimmnn's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,592
Send a message via ICQ to jimmnn Send a message via AIM to jimmnn Send a message via MSN to jimmnn Send a message via Yahoo to jimmnn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dracer777 View Post
Wirelessly posted (MOT-QA30/00.72 UP.Browser/7.2.7.5.610 (GUI) MMP/2.0)



Hahaha! Never thought about that, hopefully, we will have a large fire and mutual aid is requested from a fully encrypted FD. Either that would result in the state making encryption mandatory for every DTRS radio or getting rid of unneeded encryption, hopefully the latter.
At least Garco has addressed that with one un encrypted mac channel and all the units have access to other mac's for out of county mutual aid.

Jim<
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2009, 06:03 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 42
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces

Last edited by Kevin_N; 09-21-2009 at 06:08 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2009, 06:17 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

I haven't check for myself, but this post makes sense;
-------------------------------------------
Folks... this audio is edited for the purposes of further propagandizing the wild theories of vast secret conspiracies. Do your homework by listening to the entire unedited speech at the JFK Library (online) and you will learn that unscrupulous people with an agenda have deceived you with this post. Kennedy is referring to the spread of communism... there is no other conspiracy implied.

Shame on the deceivers.
---------------------------------------------
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions