Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Colorado Radio Discussion Forum


Colorado Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Colorado.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 02:14 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 90
Default Denver Intl Airport TGs

I was monitoring the DIA trunk system this week and noticed some odd TGs ranging from 412 to 426. Sound like alert "listen-up" tones or "page-out" something like Aurora Fire uses. Any clues?
Also, there are around 10 or so new TGs used for snow removal ranging from 1665 to 1679 very active.
I guess the equipment that DIA used in the past to remove snow could not keep up, so they now
have a staging area for AERO, a contract to help. These plows are made for the job, big.
Thanks,
Amos
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 03:58 PM
jimmnn's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,595
Send a message via ICQ to jimmnn Send a message via AIM to jimmnn Send a message via MSN to jimmnn Send a message via Yahoo to jimmnn
Default

They may be big but snow removal did not receive very good press during this current storm.

Airlines Blame DIA For Poor Response To Storm - Denver News Story - KMGH Denver

Jim<
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2009, 08:34 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 421
Default

The story did not say the same thing as the headline. The one comment from an airline:
" "On some days, DIA really knocks it out of the park. Yesterday, we ran a phenomenal operation considering the snow we had, so I think it's all just situational ... It hasn't been going as well today," Frontier Airlines spokeswoman Lindsey Purves said Thursday."
In what universe is that saying the response was poor???
It was a rough couple of days, but maintenance and ops kept up with it. I got to see what was going on up close, and all the "problems" were landside, with accidents and the usual not-taking-conditions-into-consideration stuff.
As for canceled flights: normal in a region-wide storm. We have a ton of flights to lesser airports who don't have sophisticated instrument landing systems or a snow response that can handle a major storm, or are simply too hazardous to fly into in a snowstorm (like Aspen.)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions