|
|
|
|
| Colorado Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Colorado. |

01-23-2013, 8:44 PM
|
 |
Colorado DB Administrator
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,636
|
|
Westminster & Arvada P25 Systems?
Lots of chatter in radio-land that Westminster may be choosing to sole source Cassidian for their P25 system, and not bringing Arvada along? There is also word of an RFP on the street for a P25 system for Arvada too. Interesting...
|

01-24-2013, 8:50 AM
|
|
|
I would think it would make more sense for both of these departments to join the DTRS system. I don't see a lot of advantages for departments this size to maintain their own radio system anymore when there is a system that covers their cities and allows them to roam out of their cities and stay in contact. I understand the wanting to control their own radio system, but the state system's advantages far out way that. At least I think so.
__________________
David Dean
K0PWO
Monitoring Denver, Aurora and Arapahoe County
|

01-26-2013, 1:00 PM
|
 |
Colorado DB Administrator
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,636
|
|
It seems that Westminster is looking to do their own thing, but Arvada wants to share a system with someone else. DTRS is one idea, but it is too capacity-limited to be able to handle these cities as it sits today, and coverage limited on the west end of these cities. With no sites in Westminster or Arvada, they lose a lot of in building coverage. They would probably end up having their own site(s) on DTRS and then not be allowed on any neighboring site(s) like the simulcast, Thorodin, Lookout, etc. until they add channels - which adds more cost to them on top of what they're needing in their cities. The other issue is the sustainability of DTRS these days - being so big without any funding - which I would imagine these cities view as a problem and risk unto itself.
Last edited by greenthumb; 01-26-2013 at 1:02 PM..
|

01-26-2013, 5:49 PM
|
|
|
Agree completely DTRS is out of money and is not a substainable business model.
Jim<
|

01-26-2013, 7:36 PM
|
|
|
I would love to see the Rocky Mountain EDACS users group (including Lakewood) create a metro wide P25 system somewhat like what El Paso County has. Sure, Death Valley might get 10 feet of snow before this happens, yet, I think the benefits of this type of system would have wonderful advantages for the users of it.
|

01-26-2013, 9:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 56
|
|
Its around the corner. Want to find out more? We are looking for a few good men with RF back grounds.
|

01-27-2013, 10:42 AM
|
|
|
Thanks greenthumb for the above info. I read the first part of adobe reader part where there looking at min of 7 to max of 14 freqs. Sounds like well be putting our scanners in search mode down the line.. Take about 9 months. To be completed by the years end.
__________________
Tom/MNN 140
|

01-27-2013, 11:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 126
|
|
Kind of surprising they are parting ways after all these years.
|

01-27-2013, 11:58 AM
|
|
|
The RFP states the desired use of an existing P25 system while adding a primary site (68th and Estes). Has the City already established inter-governmental agreements with neighboring P25 systems? If yes, can the City indicate the specific neighboring system(s) with which an IGA has been established?
No inter-governmental agreement has been established for the system requested in this RFP.
Also says 800MHz only, no 700MHz will be used.
Jim<
|

02-07-2013, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
This was just posted on the local hub on Denver Post, article on the Westminster PD radio system, saying that there current radio is outdated and hard to get parts for it. 20 years of EDACS..Wondering who also going digital beside Arvada?
Westminster police, fire radio to go all-digital - Your Hub
__________________
Tom/MNN 140
|

02-16-2013, 12:50 PM
|
|
|
|

02-16-2013, 1:57 PM
|
|
|
I'm curious what this radio system will do to the current interoperability solution of using Network First with Westy's neighbors. Will NWF still work?
__________________
Eric
5280Fire Photographer
MNN 199
|

02-16-2013, 5:57 PM
|
 |
Colorado DB Administrator
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,636
|
|
Theoretically, there are a lot of ways to get that system to work with Network First. It will be interesting to see if it happens though.
|

05-15-2013, 12:09 PM
|
 |
Colorado DB Administrator
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,636
|
|
Westminster just applied for a 10 GHz microwave link from the public safety center on Yates out to the fire station near 100th & Wadsworth. We'll have to see if this ends up being one of their P25 sites - no tower there that I can see right now and the microwave is supposed to be mounted on the fire station.
Last edited by greenthumb; 05-15-2013 at 12:11 PM..
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:13 AM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|