Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Colorado Radio Discussion Forum


Colorado Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Colorado.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2006, 12:23 PM
chris_a_rodgers's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 373
Send a message via AIM to chris_a_rodgers Send a message via MSN to chris_a_rodgers Send a message via Yahoo to chris_a_rodgers
Default Boulder County Dispatchers may be facing layoffs

Dispatch may be facing layoffs
Fire department pullout upsets county’s plans
By Brad Turner
The Daily Times-Call

BOULDER — County safety officials said they may be forced to lay off dispatchers after Boulder Fire Chief Larry Donner announced plans this week for the city to pull out of the county’s unfinished $7.7 million communications center. Smaller cities around the county, most of which support police dispatch costs but not fire communications, may be asked to help offset the lost revenue from Boulder Fire’s pullout. That department would have contributed about 9 percent of the facility’s $2.5 million annual operating costs, Sheriff Joe Pelle said.
If the towns and cities refuse or cannot afford to chip in more money, layoffs or spending cuts will be necessary, he said.
“We’re trying to find a solution that doesn’t affect public safety,” Pelle said Thursday after huddling with county commissioners to discuss the problem.

Pelle’s office manages dispatch calls for the county’s police and fire departments and fire districts, with a few exceptions.
Longmont runs its own emergency dispatch center. And Boulder police handles their own communications, though they currently share a dispatch facility with the county.
Boulder Fire initially planned to participate in the new dispatch facility, which is set for completion in late 2007. The 22,500-square-foot building is being built east of the Boulder County Jail off Airport Road in Boulder.
But the department backed off after calculating that for the same annual fee — about $225,000 — it could afford more dispatchers by staying at the city’s current dispatch center on 33rd Street in Boulder, Donner said.
Heavy traffic on the primary dispatch channel for county fire calls has frustrated Boulder firefighters in recent years and played a role in the decision, Donner said.
“The call load was increasing, but the number of dispatchers wasn’t,” he said. “It gets to be an issue of firefighter safety. There are days when firefighters showing up on scene can’t get through to dispatch.”
County dispatchers handled 10,209 calls for Boulder Fire in 2005. In the same year, the other cities in the county generated 4,128 calls altogether, while rural fire districts generated 10,793, according to county documents.
The pullout could be a blessing in disguise if officials can find funds to replace Boulder Fire’s funding contribution, Pelle said.
The shift should give the county’s fire frequency some badly needed breathing room, he said.
“For a while, we’ve had sort of an overworked system on the fire side,” Pelle said. “In the long run, if I don’t suffer personnel and operating costs, it’s a better deal for us.”
But finding a way to maintain the current number of county dispatchers may be tricky.
Boulder County government kicks in about $1.1 million for county dispatch operations annually, with fire and police departments from local cities shelling out the remaining $1.4 million, Pelle said.
To offset the money lost by Boulder Fire’s withdrawal, commissioners may ask cities around the county that now support police dispatch services to also support the fire dispatch budget, based on the number of fire calls generated by each town.
Louisville, which saw 1,437 fire calls in 2005, would pay about $38,000 annually under a scenario formulated Thursday by Pelle. Smaller towns such as Lyons, which had just 151 fire calls last year, would be asked to pay about $4,000.
Because of an agreement between the county government and nearly two dozen local fire districts, few of those districts pay more than a nominal dispatch fee.
The fire districts agreed in the mid-1970s to help battle blazes on county open space in exchange for fire dispatch services, Pelle said.
The deal between fire districts and open space officials doesn’t exist for municipal fire departments, so Boulder Fire pays about $225,000 in dispatch fees to the county, while the Lafayette Fire Department pays about $48,000.
At Thursday’s meeting, Lafayette Fire Chief Gerry Morrell urged Pelle and the commissioners to reform the system while finding new funds for the dispatch center.
“We really need to come up with a solution that’s going to be fair and equitable,” he said.
Donner acknowledged the unusual deal between the county and numerous fire districts was a factor in Boulder Fire’s decision to withdraw.
“The county sources didn’t match the money coming in from the city,” he said. “If the contributions were equal on both sides, there would be adequate dispatching for the county.”
County commissioners fired off a notice about the $225,000 shortfall to cities around the county Friday, saying they hope to schedule a meeting with municipal councils and boards in the coming weeks.
__________________
Chris Rodgers (NREMT-B)
My Jobs:
-Longmont Emergency Unit
-Pridemark Paramedics
-BRFD
My Website for Boulder County
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2006, 03:52 PM
scanlist's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greeley, CO
Posts: 1,450
Default

The first question will be when does BFD disappear from BRCC RED-1? Plus the licensing situation with the city and county how will that end up being sorted out?

I did notice that BRCC stopped the two tone paging for BFD late last week.

Hopefully this does not turn into an asinine situation like they have in Cheyenne where everybody is VHF (Heading to digital VHF) but the Fire chief likes and has the department on 800 MHz.

Hopefully BFD is not looking at DTRS. CCNC plans to have two DTRS sites on the air in Boulder County later this year that would provided city grade coverage.

This could get (unfortunately) interesting.

Phil.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2006, 05:41 PM
DTRS_Master's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Posts: 92
Default

Quote:
Hopefully BFD is not looking at DTRS. CCNC plans to have two DTRS sites on the air in Boulder County later this year that would provided city grade coverage.

This could get (unfortunately) interesting.
Once the coverage is there, they could do drive tests and accept the coverage for their use (MOST IMPORTANT STEP). Then, they can set up talk groups to achieve the level of interoperability that they have now and have the added capabilities to be able to roam through all of the coverage DTRS can provide and interoperate with the rest of the fire agencies on DTRS that surround Boulder county.

I think that it would be great.

I also think that they should find different ways to deal with revenue loss than removing the people who directly interface with the public. Cut salaries or positions of those "back office" people!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 05:35 AM
Halfpint's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: High atop the redwoods on Venus!
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scanlist
The first question will be when does BFD disappear from BRCC RED-1? Plus the licensing situation with the city and county how will that end up being sorted out?

I did notice that BRCC stopped the two tone paging for BFD late last week.

Hopefully this does not turn into an asinine situation like they have in Cheyenne where everybody is VHF (Heading to digital VHF) but the Fire chief likes and has the department on 800 MHz.

Hopefully BFD is not looking at DTRS. CCNC plans to have two DTRS sites on the air in Boulder County later this year that would provided city grade coverage.

This could get (unfortunately) interesting.

Phil.
Agreed. Things could get *very* `interesting' *if* BFD (Just gotta `love' those initials! {VB GRIN!}) decides that they are going to `go it on their own'. Oh, well... I guess it's just typical `People's Republic of Boulder' out of step with even their own county. {FROWN!}
__________________
Doleo ergo sum,
Halfpint
All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegtops awound?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 05:51 AM
Halfpint's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: High atop the redwoods on Venus!
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTRS_Master
Once the coverage is there, they could do drive tests and accept the coverage for their use (MOST IMPORTANT STEP). Then, they can set up talk groups to achieve the level of interoperability that they have now and have the added capabilities to be able to roam through all of the coverage DTRS can provide and interoperate with the rest of the fire agencies on DTRS that surround Boulder county.

I think that it would be great.

I also think that they should find different ways to deal with revenue loss than removing the people who directly interface with the public. Cut salaries or positions of those "back office" people!
The only `fly in the ointment' is that BFD is the Boulder *City* Fire Department and they really don't `interact' all that much with the `surrounding' county FDs all that much. (Heck! They really don't `play all that well' with any of the other municipalities around them either. Hint: It's `The People's Republic of Boulder'. {FROWN!})

As for the ways of dealing with revenue loss... Hmmmmm... When have you ever heard of any `Gummit', or otherwise, `operation' ever cutting back on the *real* `dead wood'? On top of that this is `Poly-tic-ians' we are dealing with even though they may try to claim otherwise. (It would be interesting to find out just what the *real* `power play' is that is going on here. Though I suspect that we'll probably never really find out.)

Just a *grouchy* `Olde Fart's' 2¢ worth. {WAN GRIN!}
__________________
Doleo ergo sum,
Halfpint
All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegtops awound?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does anyone have the proper frequencies for the GSMR ? SD70MAC Railroad/Railfan Monitoring Forum 7 10-09-2008 08:04 PM
Sac Area CHP AirOps mkewman Sacramento Valley Area Discussion 96 09-20-2007 02:26 AM
Need Info & Your Favorites 151-160 mHz TinEar Maryland Radio Discussion Forum 109 09-29-2006 07:53 PM
Boulder County Sheriff? wYtEbOyFoLyPh Colorado Radio Discussion Forum 3 03-30-2006 11:46 PM
800 Mhz heard in Washoe Valley Pro-95 Nevada Radio Discussion Forum 0 07-23-2004 12:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions