jimmnn said:
(CBS4) DENVER According to the Federal Communications Commission, one-third of all 911 emergency calls are made from cell phones. Technology exists for a dispatcher to immediately know the exact location such a call is coming from, but some areas in Colorado have not been successful in locating callers.
http://cbs4denver.com/topstories/local_story_138204547.html
Jim<
I have 3 thoughts on this.
1)When I'm in the mountains, I'm lucky to get any kind of signal. While cell phones are a nice luxury, people tend to think they are a cure-all. In my experience it's a bit of a miracle he got a 911 center of any kind.
2)When you're on top of a 14er (or near the top), what is the amount of time it would take for emergency help to get there and what is the survival rate once he stopped breathing?
3)Reading the federal deadline, is it the cell phone companies responsbility to have phones that transmit or the dispatch centers to have equipment to locate? It sounds likes it is both, but it says the phone companies missed the deadline. Was it that they need to replace all phones currently in use with new ones that transmit, or only have all new phones with that capability? What about people using old cell phones - is it the company's responsibility? Who is giving money to the dispatch centers for this capability?
While this is an unfortunate incident, it seems like the media using an extreme example to make a story. How about the phenomena of calling 911 and getting put on hold for 5 - 10 minutes? That makes the news, but what do you do in an emergency? I know it doesn't happen all of the time, but either does the problem getting described in the story.