RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Announcements and News > Community Announcements and News


Community Announcements and News Announcements and News of interest to the RadioReference.com Community. All new threads posted here will be moderated by the administrators. Members are encouraged to post news and information here for the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2008, 08:17 AM
blantonl's Avatar
Administrator
 
Database Admin

Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,366
Default Ohio Officials test aerostats for repeater communications

Program officials from Ohio's Multi-Agency Radio Communications System – a statewide 800-MHz digital trunked radio system -- sent a weather-proofed radio repeater up to 1,000 feet. At that altitude, the system locked onto a tower about 50 miles away, said Steve Garwood, a MARCS telecommunications system analyst.

http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/47583-1.html
__________________
Lindsay C. Blanton III
President - RadioReference.com LLC
Facebook: RadioReference | Twitter: @RadioReference
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2008, 08:58 AM
hoser147's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grand Lake St. Marys Ohio
Posts: 4,937
Default

Interesting concept, I think that Ohio weather would be somewhat of a draw back, compared to other states. I believe that one other state is doing research on the Blimp also from another article I though was posted on here, but couldn't find it. Growing up in a town that had a Big Goodyear plant, we had frequent visits from the Goodyear Blimp, many times it was docked in a field at the plant or alt the local airport. Hoser
__________________
Good Scanning Hser
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?feedId=165
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2008, 11:10 AM
comsec1's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Default License?

How would this be licensed, tower height? coverage? interference to other systems. if it is part of a system how would the microwave or T-1 work? the idea is great, the navy has been doing this with radars in the gulf of mexico. this would probably only be practible with conventional repeaters.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2008, 12:11 PM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 4,020
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

Another concern for northern states should be the Line A issue of interference with Canada.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2008, 05:36 PM
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego County, California
Posts: 429
Default

I like the tethered blimp idea better.
I saw the tethered blimp being used down in Florida Keys north of Key West used by the US Customs/DHS/other.

San Diego County RCS - 2004 Report. (Used a Airplane)
Airborne Repeater Proof-of-Concept Final Report

https://www.rcs800mhz.org/web/genera...inalreport.pdf
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2008, 09:18 AM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 4,020
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

Errrr.... Did I miss something? A tethered blimp is an aerostat.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2008, 09:45 AM
hoser147's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grand Lake St. Marys Ohio
Posts: 4,937
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNF2G View Post
Errrr.... Did I miss something? A tethered blimp is an aerostat.
Dave that is what it is, It would be great for emergency temporary replacement of downed towers.
__________________
Good Scanning Hser
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?feedId=165
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2008, 02:47 PM
SLWilson's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via MSN to SLWilson Send a message via Yahoo to SLWilson
Default Gov't....

Quote:
Originally Posted by comsec1 View Post
How would this be licensed, tower height? coverage? interference to other systems. if it is part of a system how would the microwave or T-1 work? the idea is great, the navy has been doing this with radars in the gulf of mexico. this would probably only be practible with conventional repeaters.
They ARE the government aren't they? Just "State" not Federal....So, as far as licensing, I'd say (for an emergency) the FCC wouldn't even care....

As far as at a tower site with a downed tower, (this is a guess on my part) they could use the blimp to temporarily replace antennas for use by the existing equipment at a tower site that lost its tower. Or, they could use it to get traffic into an area that has lost everything (relayed by a tower that it CAN reach) to link it to another working site.

Very interesting prospect. They DO have mobile tower sites to tow into an area for use in emergencies....

Steve/KB8FAR
__________________
[B][COLOR="Navy"]I have my time in. Gonna stick around to see what happens next though !
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2008, 03:29 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 10,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLWilson View Post
They ARE the government aren't they? Just "State" not Federal....So, as far as licensing, I'd say (for an emergency) the FCC wouldn't even care....
All depends, but they are in no way free from FCC requirements.

Maybe keep an STA ready to send.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2008, 03:37 PM
hoser147's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Grand Lake St. Marys Ohio
Posts: 4,937
Default

Need one for my Scanner antenna..............
__________________
Good Scanning Hser
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?feedId=165
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2008, 05:08 PM
crayon's Avatar
RF Cartography Ninja
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 95� 53 17.67
Posts: 3,139
Send a message via ICQ to crayon Send a message via MSN to crayon Send a message via Yahoo to crayon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoser147 View Post
Need one for my Scanner antenna..............
rgr that.

__________________
Maps tell stories.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2008, 09:22 PM
SLWilson's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via MSN to SLWilson Send a message via Yahoo to SLWilson
Default Well....

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
All depends, but they are in no way free from FCC requirements.
Maybe keep an STA ready to send.
I'm guessing that if something had happened where it was bad enough to get that out of the shed, the FCC wouldn't even be going to work or whatever it is they do! No one there to answer a complaint about the thing if it is actually "that bad"....

We'd probably (in Ohio) be on our own anyway. Kinda like another hurricane in New Orleans....

Steve
__________________
[B][COLOR="Navy"]I have my time in. Gonna stick around to see what happens next though !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC Licenses Codes bfalcetto General Scanning Forum 9 01-30-2010 11:20 AM
Officials push for new Comms system cellblock776 Louisiana Radio Discussion Forum 9 10-08-2005 08:33 PM
Please ThornyO5 General Scanning Forum 11 04-06-2005 12:43 PM
Any news on MMR? Air490 Australia Radio Discussion Forums 2 02-21-2005 06:35 PM
Question regarding FCC classification code milf General Scanning Forum 6 05-21-2004 12:22 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions