Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Announcements and News > Community Announcements and News


Community Announcements and News Announcements and News of interest to the RadioReference.com Community. All new threads posted here will be moderated by the administrators. Members are encouraged to post news and information here for the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 05:43 AM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,994
Default Rio Grande, TX - Feds: Cartel turns to radio waves to avoid police detection

RIO GRANDE, Texas - The Gulf Cartel and the Zetas have established a sophisticated radio communications network that stretches hundreds of miles and has stymied recent law enforcement advances in monitoring cellular phones, according to court documents obtained Monday.

Feds: Cartel turns to radio waves to avoid police detection | cartel, radio, hundreds - Now - TheMonitor.com
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.

Last edited by Thunderbolt; 08-25-2009 at 05:46 AM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:09 AM
soncorn's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 345
Send a message via MSN to soncorn Send a message via Yahoo to soncorn
Default

Pretty neat actually. But I have a hard time believing the Feds cannot monitor it, even if it has sophisticated encryption.
__________________
Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state.
- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:24 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,110
Default

The article did not specifically mention encryption, but the feds could monitor the cartel's encrypted communications, as long as the cartel to provides them with the encryption key.

You have to admire their efficiency, building new towers where necessary and also using existing infrastructure.

So did they go with Motorola or MA/COM?

GTO_04

Last edited by GTO_04; 08-25-2009 at 09:33 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:48 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 45
Default

Is MRA providing the network?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 10:44 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 10,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cifd64 View Post
Is MRA providing the network?
Hmm, good question.
__________________
Lou Maag

Rules and Guidelines for Forum Post Content
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 03:49 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 210
Send a message via AIM to Lynch_Christopher
Default

Sounds impressive. I was surprised by the quote saying that the radio network exceed the capability of the federal law enforcement monitoring by several years.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 08:08 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynch_Christopher View Post
Sounds impressive. I was surprised by the quote saying that the radio network exceed the capability of the federal law enforcement monitoring by several years.
Yes, the cartels were most likely using 1 watt bubble pack radios. Exceeding the .5 watt dick tracy wrist watch radios the fed network has
I'd like to know what their network consisted of. Repeaters ain't new, so what makes it exceed the capability of the feds by several years?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 08:14 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 150
Send a message via AIM to i_galbreath Send a message via Yahoo to i_galbreath
Default

This explains why none of the M/A Com systems in the US aren't getting done...
__________________
Relm RP3600--Portable 4
Pro-96--Portable 6
Uniden BC148XLT--Base Station
Yaesu FT-60R (VHF/UHF)--Portable 2
VX-500 (VHF)--Car Radio
Kenwood TK-2107 (VHF)--For sale or trade
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2009, 11:14 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 45
Default how do you like it back?

I like that its getting flung right back in law enforcements faces.
__________________
Boycott Motorola!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2009, 04:59 PM
RADIOGUY2002's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,090
Send a message via AIM to RADIOGUY2002
Arrow This is kinda funny

This is kinda funny

Years and years of watching law enforcement using radios (nextel, etc) and this comes as a huge surprise. To be honest with everyone this does not surprise me and supports the highest bidder concept of business. The M/A Comm is a nice pun, but not that really of a stretch. They said patched network, on veering frequencies setup like repeaters or up / down links. A few study guides and utilizing ham guides and you got a structure setup pretty fast. Making it also very field deploy able, which is great for fast comms in a hurry, and since nextel's are pretty easy for disposable use you have the infrastructure already in play and short term costs.

Hmm, tuff call 2,000 g's for a repeater for about 25 miles up to 35 miles with limited height, that like candy money to the cartel, with a coms tech savvy guy on broad for 100k and you got some pretty skilled and clear based systems.
__________________
Thanks, Ryan. Seller of Icom & Kenwood Radios
GMRS=WQHR752
Icom and Vertex Equipment=F5061/F6061-5, F43/33-4, F3161/4161T-2, FR3000-1, VXR-7000(U)
Uniden=BC-396T & 996T
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2009, 05:43 PM
Careful, I CAN hear you!
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,548
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

Using already in place infrastructure.. Cells towers, TV Towers, and mexican government radio sites.. which are paid out of cash of course to have turned backs... A nice simple SS/FH with encryption.... With all the available technologies out there, not that hard to set up with the money. The only high tech to break it would be military or CIA/NSA, and they really dont play nice with FBI/DEA unless you prove to them its a matter of say terrorism.... We know they use sat phones also... Add in interconnect with that.... Sound like what most US public safety is trying to set up??? LOL Of course this adds fuel to the lets encrypt everything fires...
__________________
Admin for AR, LA, MS, and TN
*RS PRO-96, RS PRO-92B, BC855XLT*
"Did I say something funny meow?"
"If a tree falls, do the squirrels get FEMA trailers?"
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2009, 06:11 PM
RADIOGUY2002's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,090
Send a message via AIM to RADIOGUY2002
Default Yes it does

yes, it does.
__________________
Thanks, Ryan. Seller of Icom & Kenwood Radios
GMRS=WQHR752
Icom and Vertex Equipment=F5061/F6061-5, F43/33-4, F3161/4161T-2, FR3000-1, VXR-7000(U)
Uniden=BC-396T & 996T
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2009, 10:48 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Smile Mmmmmm

I Geuss I need to start listening to more freqs but I think I need to work on my spanish first. Good artical
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009, 09:10 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milf View Post
Using already in place infrastructure.. Cells towers, TV Towers, and mexican government radio sites.. which are paid out of cash of course to have turned backs... A nice simple SS/FH with encryption.... With all the available technologies out there, not that hard to set up with the money. The only high tech to break it would be military or CIA/NSA, and they really dont play nice with FBI/DEA unless you prove to them its a matter of say terrorism.... We know they use sat phones also... Add in interconnect with that.... Sound like what most US public safety is trying to set up??? LOL Of course this adds fuel to the lets encrypt everything fires...
Except that encryption didn't really help the feds much here. If anything it would help the drug cartel if they implemented it for their own system.

GTO_04
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009, 09:13 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 317
Default

That's crazy but I can understand it "exceeding" law enforcement's capabilities granted that most people tasked with monitoring radio traffic like that would be the FCC, military, NSA/CIA, ham radio operators (that are good at that fox hunting sort of thing), and a handful of other radio professionals. Law enforcement understands THEIR radios, the ones they use for work and they understand cellphones in that MOST people committing crimes are eventually going to use one in the commission of those crimes. Plus, when it comes to repeaters, if you do not know a repeater is in play (and granted encryption is not being used), a monitoring station may only hear one half of a conversation. It's hard to listen in on an inter-geographical radio network if you don't know how it is setup.
__________________
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn..."
~Gone With the Wind

Terrell

"Ham radio is one of the few slices of insanity that you actually have to test into..."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009, 03:52 PM
RADIOGUY2002's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,090
Send a message via AIM to RADIOGUY2002
Default

Interesting perspective, most of the time its stumbling upon the un-expected and finding the users or operators that exist on the bandwidth. This all depends on your interest in the hobby, or if you have a limited technical bases and have lots of free time to read up on things, making yourself educated. This is what happens when the economy is the way it is you start teaching yourself new things and looking for things to listen too.

Just like watching to much history channel... as oppose to bad television.
__________________
Thanks, Ryan. Seller of Icom & Kenwood Radios
GMRS=WQHR752
Icom and Vertex Equipment=F5061/F6061-5, F43/33-4, F3161/4161T-2, FR3000-1, VXR-7000(U)
Uniden=BC-396T & 996T
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:18 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 317
Default

Heh heh, I've learned a lot about the world thanks to Discovery and History (at least back before the reality shows started taking up most of the airtime).

I bet some of those minutemen down there on the border are ham radio operators or at least radio enthusiast and carry some gear with them and of course many others in the area I'm sure scan the frequencies like the rest of us and if they stumble on something obviously illegal, they'll do something about it (such as report it to the authorities). That is probably how a lot of major case breaks occur, stumbling.
__________________
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn..."
~Gone With the Wind

Terrell

"Ham radio is one of the few slices of insanity that you actually have to test into..."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:32 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tekshogun View Post
Law enforcement understands THEIR radios, the ones they use for work and they understand cellphones in that MOST people committing crimes are eventually going to use one in the commission of those crimes. Plus, when it comes to repeaters, if you do not know a repeater is in play (and granted encryption is not being used), a monitoring station may only hear one half of a conversation. It's hard to listen in on an inter-geographical radio network if you don't know how it is setup.
Not to start a bashing thread, but Law Enforcement understanding radios is a broad statement. I've known some who only know push to talk, release to listen, and then I've known some who actually have participated in the development of conventional and trunked systems. Anyways, I would think the Feds would have (or be able to contract with) persons with the knowledge to combat criminals with technology.
__________________
APTN
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2009, 11:35 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by APTN View Post
Not to start a bashing thread, but Law Enforcement understanding radios is a broad statement. I've known some who only know push to talk, release to listen, and then I've known some who actually have participated in the development of conventional and trunked systems. Anyways, I would think the Feds would have (or be able to contract with) persons with the knowledge to combat criminals with technology.
I was not bashing at all. I meant no disrespect to law enforcement in general at all. Not to try and save face with credentials but I know, very well, several police officers and other law enforcement personnel (and former) as well as those that work as support for LE, that are or were in the position to make great strides and progress when it came to radio, especially being that some are ham radio operators and have had their hands in wireless telecommunications longer than I've been alive so they've been a part of the development of trunked, digital, encrypted, and even interoperability systems. With that said, my intent was to establish that in most cases, criminals are not using radios being that cellphones and landlines are the first obvious means of communication to LE to find and monitor (and for criminals to use). When they do establish the fact that radios are in use, those investigative teams typically are not prepared to intercept and as you stated they typically need to turn to more specialized teams from their agencies or go to an outside source. That often takes time to get into position. If these investigators were given training and equipment (such as a scanner with a feature to stalk a signal they can "get on the ground running" instead of waiting for someone else to do it.
__________________
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn..."
~Gone With the Wind

Terrell

"Ham radio is one of the few slices of insanity that you actually have to test into..."
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-28-2009, 02:01 PM
Careful, I CAN hear you!
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,548
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

Not to mention that with some systems, the only way to crack in is to get help from the manufacturer of the type of system used. Once you determine the type, flavor, and "guts" of a network, then you start with serious working on it. That takes time itself, if its not a simple say Motorola Type I, II, IIi, EDACS, or LTR... SS.FH systems are very hard to break, as are systems using the newer encryptions, and digital formats other than the ones that are in everyday use here in the states. Lets say you set up a wide area TRS piggybacking on the areas AM/FM, Cellular, and Television towers, using say TETRA.... Or one of the military formats from say Cuba.... Heck your a drug cartel, you can afford anything out there..... It will take minimum a month for local LEA's to even begin to figure out what your doing, another month or so for them to finally go crawling to an higher level agency because even in this age of interop... Agencies don't like to ask for help unless its a top priority case. Then itll take about a month for them to get really working on it... So your safe if your using a good set up for at least 6 months. Thats a LONG time frame to do things, and set up a backup for that system. Not to mention, cartels don't have to worry about bidders, time frames, as cash buys you speedy work, legality of whose tower your on, again cash talks. Eventually yes, you'll get popped... on that net... But what about the other three nets you have established?? WEG
__________________
Admin for AR, LA, MS, and TN
*RS PRO-96, RS PRO-92B, BC855XLT*
"Did I say something funny meow?"
"If a tree falls, do the squirrels get FEMA trailers?"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2007/07/29 - VHF Low Band kkn50 Skip / Tropospheric Ducting Forum 2 07-31-2007 04:51 PM
FL MILAIR 1-28 May '07 BMT Florida Radio Discussion Forum 2 05-29-2007 07:59 PM
New and Updated list of Everything for sale!!! Radios,lights ROOFLIFECO Old Classifieds Archives 0 02-02-2005 05:21 PM
Queensland Inquiry into Police Radio communications begins grant Australia Radio Discussion Forums 0 07-27-2004 06:12 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions