RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Announcements and News > Community Announcements and News


Community Announcements and News Announcements and News of interest to the RadioReference.com Community. All new threads posted here will be moderated by the administrators. Members are encouraged to post news and information here for the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2012, 4:31 PM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Forums Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 6,196
Default Vicksburg, MS - City calls for meeting with state over radio

VICKSBURG, Miss. — Vicksburg officials want to meet with the state to discuss replacing a local radio system it shares with Warren County.

Read more here: City calls for meeting with state over radio | News | The Sun Herald
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2012, 11:41 AM
rapidcharger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bringing you happy thoughts and crunching the numbers daily since 2012
Posts: 659
Send a message via ICQ to rapidcharger
Default

Doesn't look good for the people of MS who will end up footing the bill for this or the first responders who will inevitably have to go forgo resources to pay for this system that the Mississippi Wireless Communications Commission is forcing them to join. Their current system is supposedly "At the end of it's life" I guess that was determined by a motorola salesman and not radio techs or system engineers. This is government at its worst.

I'm guessing the public will not be allowed at the meeting. Dissenting viewpoints from the people that actually have to pay for it all could be a problem for motorola.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2012, 12:33 PM
kb2vxa's Avatar
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
Posts: 6,127
Default

I can't disagree, a 19 year old system is pretty much at the end of its life with replacement parts almost made of unobtanium. Re-banding tells me it's an 800MHz system and if my guess is right the statewide system is also 800MHz as they usually are so linking with it shouldn't be a problem. All in all Motorola beats Harris hands down and Chicken Little adopted a new phrase, Open Sky is falling!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2012, 9:23 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MS
Posts: 164
Default

The MSWIN system is 700mhz and from the sounds of the article they want to purchase their own system and not get on MSWIN. Currently any radio communication systems over 100K must be approved by the MSWIN commission. I am confused as the state doesn't require any linking, but instead mandates that new systems must be P25 for interoperability.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2012, 11:01 PM
milf's Avatar
Careful, I CAN hear you!
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

It doesn't matter what band your on, conventional, or trunking. If you get a P-25 system, it will work with very little hassle with another P-25 system. Vicksburg/Warren County is one of the oldest of the legacy Motorola Type II's in MS. The MSWIN is 700 MHz, Motorola ASTRO-25 P-25 Phase II. If V/WC upgrades thier system to an ASTRO-25 from big M, its an even simpler linking with the RSSI. Even if they went to say Harris for an P-25 system, it would still mesh with MSWIN. Heck LA, MS, TX, and AR are already linked with thier wide area P-25 systems vias RSSI, sharing interop TG's for emergencies such as hurricanes and the BP oil spill. Thats one of the reasons for the P-25 protocols. True interop! You will be hearing a lot more stories out of MS soon. There are at least 4 very old Motorola TRS's other than V/WC's that are at, or PAST thier "expiration date" and are barely kept functioning.
__________________
Admin & Mod for AR, LA, MS, and TN
Scanology, its the path to monitoring happiness!
Support your local Scanologists!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 8:47 AM
rapidcharger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bringing you happy thoughts and crunching the numbers daily since 2012
Posts: 659
Send a message via ICQ to rapidcharger
Default

I've lived through 3 direct hits from hurricanes in florida, and one unnamed storm that turned out to be of hurricane strength. If there's anything I've learned about communications infrastructure in a disaster situation is that it can't be relied upon. Any doomsday prepper knows that. The notion that there are going to be all these agencies that will want to talk to each other in a disaster situation and actually BE ABLE to do so is absolutely ludicrous. Not to mention Warren County is 150 miles away from the coast. Oil spills, hurricanes... gimme a break.

Even if there will be another oil spill or some storm that doesn't wipe out the infrastructure once every 50 years, why would tax payers stand for spending this kind of money on something that most likely isn't even going to ever happen again during the supposed shelf life of the proposed radio system?

That just doesn't make sense for the price tag. You can accomplish interoperability a number of ways even using that 1950's cold war era technology known as analog conventional.

And all this talk about radio systems making it past their expiration date... if it was anything else, that would be a testament to it's proven reliability.

I'm not against technological advancements. I am against wasting money on systems under the guise they will once day be needed for some once in 50 or 100 years event. Time to stand up and say no.

No word in the article about what any proposed system would cost but Warren county, including Vicksburg has a population of 43,000 and change. The median household income is $35k and change and the 911 center is funded by fees on people's phone bills. The overwhelming majority of the county is sparsely populated (or completely unpopulated) forest land. This is not a county that needs expensive infrastructure and more importantly it is not a county that can afford it.

I find it extremely disturbing that this forum of supposed scanner enthusiasts has such a vocal cheering squad for this kind of waste.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:16 AM
milf's Avatar
Careful, I CAN hear you!
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

OK you lived through hurricanes? Then you know its not a lil bitty one town storm? Hurricanes that come in from the Gulf of Mexico affect the ENTIRE state of MS. And also usually AL, and LA too. Then once they downgrade to TS and TD, they are affecting TN, AR, NC, KY, MO, and so on. Lets also examine that MS in the past few years has had Katrina, and at least one other pretty good hurricane, tornadoes all over, Yazoo County twice in like two months time, the massive MS River flooding that hit from the delta, all the way to Natchez.... The MSWIN was the go to system that WORKED for everyone post Katrina. Instead of everyone on five to ten differing systems and unable to talk to each other. Not to mention that if Warren County does go P-25, they WILL get USDHS Grants to cover biggest part of the bills.
__________________
Admin & Mod for AR, LA, MS, and TN
Scanology, its the path to monitoring happiness!
Support your local Scanologists!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 2:11 PM
kb2vxa's Avatar
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
Posts: 6,127
Default

"If there's anything I've learned about communications infrastructure in a disaster situation is that it can't be relied upon."

Florida is not New Jersey, ours held up just fine through Sandy even in the hardest hit coastal areas. Seaside Heights is a shining star, it was virtually wiped off the map but the PD was up and running. Those with Tinkertoy systems should come here and learn how we cope with disaster.

"Any doomsday prepper knows that."

Oh gawd, I'm at a loss for words.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 3:07 PM
zerg901's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington MA
Posts: 2,418
Default

Warren County population is 48,000. I bet that 1 police channel, 1 DPW channel, and 1 fire/ems channel would handle 99.99% of their needs. What would that cost? $250,000? (for all new mobiles, portables, and repeaters). Hopefully not $7 million.

AFAIK - 75% of Mississippi is still on VHF highband. So if the State is forcing everyone to go 700 mhz or 800 mhz - that would be very expensive.

Anyone know what they really mean by "compatible with the state system"? How could a 150 Mhz radio ever be really compatible with a 700/800 mhz radio (without a bunch of linking gear)?

I have not heard that P25 radios can resist disasters any better than non P25 radios. If you lose a tower - digital or analog - you are going to have a big hole in your system.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 4:33 PM
rapidcharger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bringing you happy thoughts and crunching the numbers daily since 2012
Posts: 659
Send a message via ICQ to rapidcharger
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milf View Post
f Warren County does go P-25, they WILL get USDHS Grants to cover biggest part of the bills.
M**f, you and I will never agree on this subject but can I just ask you where you think that money comes from?

This is why all taxpayers across the country should be concerned with these radio systems even when they are not in their own backyard.

Unnecessary radio communications infrastructure where it is not wanted and not needed is the same thing as building a bridge to nowhere.
I'm OK with bridges too! Just where they are wanted, needed and paid for.

Last edited by rapidcharger; 11-29-2012 at 4:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2012, 6:42 PM
milf's Avatar
Careful, I CAN hear you!
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

Anyone know what they really mean by "compatible with the state system"? How could a 150 Mhz radio ever be really compatible with a 700/800 mhz radio (without a bunch of linking gear)?

Yes, if the equipment they buy is P-25, it is easily linked through software, to any other P-25 system. Doesn't matter if its 150, 380, 400, 700, or 800 MHz. In TN the state will have a system comprised of VHF high, 700, and 800 MHz all linked via RSSI. Sharing TG's, which can also be patched to Fed/Non Fed interop etc.
__________________
Admin & Mod for AR, LA, MS, and TN
Scanology, its the path to monitoring happiness!
Support your local Scanologists!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2012, 10:26 AM
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 18
Default

Isn't the interfacing of P25 systems accomplished by the ISSI or Inter RF SubSystem Interface.

I don't understand how the Radio Signal Strength Indicator could be used to connect systems.

Regards,

JD
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2012, 10:39 AM
milf's Avatar
Careful, I CAN hear you!
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

RF Sub System Interface RSSI. Forgot to add the Inter. IRSSI. I have heard it called RSSI so much that I forget the other part.
__________________
Admin & Mod for AR, LA, MS, and TN
Scanology, its the path to monitoring happiness!
Support your local Scanologists!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2012, 8:29 AM
zerg901's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington MA
Posts: 2,418
Default

OK - the radios can be "linked" WITH a BUNCH of linking gear
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2012, 10:35 PM
milf's Avatar
Careful, I CAN hear you!
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,694
Send a message via MSN to milf Send a message via Yahoo to milf
Default

Bunch? Umm no, its done with software. A few keypresses, thats it. Most of the things radio systems do now is done with software. The days of having to do all your "patching" with lots of hardware, and programming are over. Welcome to 2012, about to be 2013. The age of VoIP, IP25, OTAR, P-25 Phase II (TDMA digital where you can now have two slots per tg, and two slots per frequency in conventional). Welcome to the point where if you blink, SDR will be the new standard for communications. We have scanners that do things that were said to be impossible just a couple of years ago. We have radios that can do multiple frequency bands at the same time, as well as both analog and digital at the same time, and oh yeah, trunking and conventional at the same time. If you had told me this would be possible now just ten years ago, I would have wanted to sample the drugs you were on. Now, I ask you, what can we do wityh the next generation of communications?
__________________
Admin & Mod for AR, LA, MS, and TN
Scanology, its the path to monitoring happiness!
Support your local Scanologists!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2012, 8:00 AM
DickH's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kb2vxa View Post
I can't disagree, a 19 year old system is pretty much at the end of its life with replacement parts almost made of unobtanium. ...
Replacement parts are unavailable because the radio manufacturers have decided not to make them anymore so they can sell new systems. Todays electronics are so reliable they will last many years longer than the old tube type equipment that lasted for many years.
__________________
Dick H
http://dickh.zenfolio.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions