RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Announcements and News > Community Announcements and News


Community Announcements and News Announcements and News of interest to the RadioReference.com Community. All new threads posted here will be moderated by the administrators. Members are encouraged to post news and information here for the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2013, 8:37 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Baldwin County Alabama
Posts: 21
Default MOBILE, Ala. Mobile Police Radio Black Out

Special Report: Radio Black Out | Fox10tv.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2013, 11:21 PM
MTS2000des's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 1,380
Default

Probably one of the better reports I've seen.
It's clear that in law enforcement, there are two schools of thought- those who have no problem with citizens listening in, and those who do NOT want citizens to listen into their communications.

Once again, we see how scanner apps are cited as being a reason for encryption by those on the side of encrypting everything, though they were "unable to quantify specific cases" of such apps being used to aid offenders in specific cases. These are also the same who use the 9/11 Security Theater card like clockwork to justify their use of encryption, procurement of expensive trunked radio systems, et al.
__________________
All opinions, statements, posts, or information made public are those exclusively of the author, and not those of his employer, contractors or associates.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2013, 11:29 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: port richey
Posts: 98
Default mobile enc.

cable channel last night CRIME AN INVESTAGATION had a program about corrupt law enforcement officers there final thought was if no one is listening an watching law enforcement then there is a large properbality of corruption in that department. to me that says it all so what does MOBILE PD HAVE TO HIDE we will never know. i do know in florida corruption is rampant. latest NEW PORT RICHEY POLICE OFFICER DEALING DRUGS OUT OF HIS PATROL CAR . a decorated officer currently in jail
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 12:29 AM
szron's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 111
Send a message via MSN to szron Send a message via Skype™ to szron
Default

As MTS2000des said

Two kinds of police.

Ones that see public as an ally and those that see public as a threat.

I hope the public will consider that on next mayor/sheriff elections.
__________________
K7POL
Monitoring Snohomish County Emergency Radio System.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 6:57 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 103
Default

I was talking to a buddy of mine the other day about this encryption BS. He said in 26 years of being in Law Enforcement, he only ever encountered 1 person who had a scanner during the course of a crime, and that was really pushing to say it was used during a crime. ( being it wasn't even programmed to the proper jurisdiction , and it was in the kitchen where his grandmother probably left it)

But he HAD said on numerous occasions prior to their system being encrypted, they would get phone calls after a BOLO went out , giving them information about possible suspects and or vehicles being spotted because people HEARD IT.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 7:08 AM
szron's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 111
Send a message via MSN to szron Send a message via Skype™ to szron
Default

Quote:
they would get phone calls after a BOLO went out , giving them information about possible suspects and or vehicles being spotted because people HEARD IT.
I probably almost caught/spotted (of course I wouldn't approach him but report to the pd) a thief from a mall because I was driving right pass it and a BOLO went out. Stupid me turned to the wrong mall entry.

But before this turns into your yet another RR encryption busting thread I want to make a positive point about the report itself. First time I've seen journalists taking this so seriously and in more or less technically accurate manner. Even though sometimes we cringe when they butcher technicalities of radio communications I think that they are our most powerful allies if we want to keep things in the open.
__________________
K7POL
Monitoring Snohomish County Emergency Radio System.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 7:23 AM
KE5TLF's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MS Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,311
Default

Already posted where it belongs:
Mobile City on Cnty Radio system.

Such a great story that they completely omit that what they are doing is switching to ProVoice, which is a pretty effective move in and of itself for shutting out scanners. Encryption on top of that is more of a waste of money than anything else. A point they should have brought up but didn't. Now when they switch again to P25IP then encryption will be the main issue.

Last edited by KE5TLF; 02-18-2013 at 7:27 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 8:29 AM
dcr_inc's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delta, Pa
Posts: 274
Default

As for the scanner apps on the phones... If the perp can out run a cop who has a 20-30 lead (due to internet delay) then the perp deserves to win..
The scanner apps are delayed by nature..

So where will encryption add any advantage to the cops?.
__________________
PSR800 2 , PSR600, PSR500, PRO2096, PRO106, BCD 296D P25 card, Commercial FCC license, Ham General, FAA Private Pilot, Business Owner, APCO Certified Tech.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 9:08 AM
rapidcharger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bringing you happy thoughts and crunching the numbers daily since 2012
Posts: 659
Send a message via ICQ to rapidcharger
Default

That was the best media coverage of encryption I've ever seen. Very thorough and for a change they talk about it before the fact rather than after. They spent a lot of time explaining it. The interviews probably could have been a little more balanced but the fire chief said it best... "We just don't have anything to hide."
I'm a little surprised that there aren't more comments on the web site from non scanner owners. I guess they probably should have talked about how much going incognito has cost and will cost the taxpayers. Personally, bad cops are going to hide no matter what. Before DTRS, they'd just switch to their nextel for the stuff they didn't want over the air. It's the cost of going digital "due to 9/11" that bothers me the most. Especially when the agencies that repsonded to 9/11 on 9/11 didn't even go digital.

I love that shot where they cut to one of the facebook pages for the police department that will be telling the public everything they need to know on facebook and twitter and it showed a big "LOL cat" picture. . That just says it all right there.
I can haz encryption.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 10:16 AM
chanman13's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Portsmouth,Virginia
Posts: 340
Default

Fox news knows their stuff, very well put together story.
__________________
RS pro-163 GRE PSR-800 x2,
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 10:41 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Hey Y'all,
This is very bad thing.
I thought the public was the eyes and ears of the police department.
How many time has PD said over the radio looking for someone or something.
And the public called in to say hey. The car or person your looking for is over here.
I understand why sometime certain information should be encrypted.
I like to listen what is going on in town.
I work for the EMS / Sheriff department side.
I do believe one day this will come back and bite the departments who use encryption full time.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 12:55 PM
sc8 sc8 is offline
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 409
Default

What's easier to do:

Encrypt police radio transmissions

or

Teach officers not to act like pubescent 13 year olds on the radio (ie. no pointing out women, or how ugly kids involved in traffic stops look, etc)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 4:38 PM
KE5TLF's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MS Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rapidcharger View Post
The interviews probably could have been a little more balanced but the fire chief said it best... "We just don't have anything to hide."
Again, it's irrelavent since they too have already made the switch to the MC EDACS and are also using ProVoice. THIS is the REAL fact that will shut out all but the most saavy monitoring enthusiast. The very, very few with the skills, dedication and resources to run a DSD setup.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 6:03 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Default Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Take a look at the interesting article published last year in the Spec.com... All we can say is "Who will watch the watchers?" Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Interesting... | Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 7:50 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Iberia
Posts: 60
Default

What type of encryption will they be using? Where is the hacker this country desperately needs who will post on an overseas website how to break this crap. Hey how about using some drones to give the public real time info. on where the marked units are.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 8:37 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 34
Default

A detective friend of mine (and MTS2000des as well) pointed out that, and I quote, "we don't say anything over the radio that we care if it's overheard or not". That's what a "signal 59" (meet me/meet with) is for.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 8:43 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTS2000des View Post
Probably one of the better reports I've seen.
It's clear that in law enforcement, there are two schools of thought- those who have no problem with citizens listening in, and those who do NOT want citizens to listen into their communications.

Once again, we see how scanner apps are cited as being a reason for encryption by those on the side of encrypting everything, though they were "unable to quantify specific cases" of such apps being used to aid offenders in specific cases. These are also the same who use the 9/11 Security Theater card like clockwork to justify their use of encryption, procurement of expensive trunked radio systems, et al.
Hey MTS2000des, are you referring to anyone we both know who might have used that 9-11 Security Theater card in certain "kickoffs" of certain brand-new trunking systems ????? They all love to play "terrorist under every rock" to the naive public, but for those, like us, who THINK about this thing, we know it's all.....well, as you said.....theater.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2013, 9:53 PM
rjk_165's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 126
Default

Personally, I think that taxpayers should be able to listen to their government agencies. Them encrypting a system makes you wonder if there is something they don't want the taxpayers hearing.
__________________
Owner - CT Incidents (Incident Dispatching Service/Emergency communications service)

CTI is undergoing a re-evaluation and overhaul of the system and operations. Stay tuned for more info.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2013, 9:21 AM
rapidcharger's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bringing you happy thoughts and crunching the numbers daily since 2012
Posts: 659
Send a message via ICQ to rapidcharger
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjk_165 View Post
Personally, I think that taxpayers should be able to listen to their government agencies. Them encrypting a system makes you wonder if there is something they don't want the taxpayers hearing.
I'm reminded of the customary phrase heard in every episode of every cop show ever created when the suspect flees on foot and the K9 unit comes out and a perimeter is set up and the air unit is flying overhead with the Nightsun and they finally track down the suspect hiding in a storage shed in someone's backyard. The suspect always proclaims they didn't do anything and the cops always say when they drag the suspect out "If you haven't done anything wrong, why are you hiding?"
It looks just as suspicious when the cops run and hide as it does when a suspect runs and hides especially when an increasing number of amateur video surfaces of cops abusing their power and violating laws themselves.

A little bit of good faith goes a long ways in most communities and encryption just leaves the mind to imagine all sorts of abuses. Unfortunately not enough people stand up and speak out against it. This TV news report hopefully raised some awareness.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2013, 3:06 PM
gtaman's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 340
Default

I hate encryption but its out there. What I wish is they only encrypt the records channels. Or any hazardous channel. That's what the military does.
__________________
Proud owner of a HARRIS FALCON III AN PRC-152 Multiband Radio.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions