Worcester MA - PD app has scanner

Status
Not open for further replies.

zerg901

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
3,725
Location
yup
Worcester PD moves into app space - Worcester Telegram & Gazette - telegram.com

WORCESTER — Instead of craning your neck to look out the window to see why police cruisers are converging on your neighborhood, grab an iPhone or Android-based phone and listen to the Police Department's radio chatter directly from its newly developed application for digital devices.

Santa Cruz CA PD also has an app with scanner feed
 

rapidcharger

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
2,382
Location
The land of broken calculators.
thumbsup2.gif

Worcester and Santa Cruz... two police departments that obviously have nothing to hide.

Of course, he who provides the feed also controls when it goes down. Perhaps a better strategy though then encryption.
 

mlmummert

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
356
Interesting. Does anyone know how close to real time they are? In other words, is there a delay?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

gr8rcall

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
727
Location
Alamance County, NC
This is great! As the article says, maybe some other departments will follow in their footsteps!

Nice to see a department that WANTS to have us listen in!
 

gtaman

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
1,042
Location
GALAXY 19 91.0° W
I like this idea. I think that's the cleanest feed I've ever heard. The fact that they are probibly using a radio in dispatch for the feed.
 

JokeInsurance

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
58
Location
NOVA
Like everyone else has said, I hope other police departments take notice and follow these footsteps. And perhaps departments such as Washington DC Police Department and Allentown Police will take notice.
 

lazierfan

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Map Page AA-18
I would be completely ok with RR going with archive only with police and sheriff traffic.

A proposal for Mr. Blanton to try this configuration with test feeds or perhaps a willing feed provider.

Live police traffic is an obvious target for encryption. Membership to RR and access to archive only and no live traffic is a solution to be at least pondered.

IMHO Fire, aircraft, Railroad, Dog catcher traffic is not eligible for this proposal. The entities proposing encryption on any of those should seriously get professional help.
 

zerg901

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
3,725
Location
yup
lazierfan - there are a couple of problems with your proposal.

Your proposal will not stop bystanders from tweeting the action in real time.

Your proposal will prevent residents from hearing a real time threat that is in their neighborhood.

Perhaps the feeds can be set up for real time in the local area - and on a delay in other areas.
 

JoeyC

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,523
Location
San Diego, CA
Like everyone else has said, I hope other police departments take notice and follow these footsteps. And perhaps departments such as Washington DC Police Department and Allentown Police will take notice.

I would be concerned that any department that is now running encryption and puts up a live stream or a clear channel for dispatch is doing so only for appearance sake. These clear channels would simply be an announcement channel and nothing of any interest will be carried there. Didn't some other department recently reverse their decision to encrypt only to put up an announcement channel because the media griped loudly enough?

lazierfan - there are a couple of problems with your proposal.

First he would have to get Mr Blanton (and the streaming sheep) to acknowledge there is an actual problem. So far I haven't seen that they do.
 

lazierfan

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
381
Location
Map Page AA-18
I would be concerned that any department that is now running encryption and puts up a live stream or a clear channel for dispatch is doing so only for appearance sake. These clear channels would simply be an announcement channel and nothing of any interest will be carried there. Didn't some other department recently reverse their decision to encrypt only to put up an announcement channel because the media griped loudly enough?



First he would have to get Mr Blanton (and the streaming sheep) to acknowledge there is an actual problem. So far I haven't seen that they do.

Simply saw my idea as a stopgap to discourage the few of our feed providers from dropping their feed altogether- that's the only 'problem' I was focused on. Not really a RR problem, no.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top