Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Announcements and News > Community Announcements and News


Community Announcements and News Announcements and News of interest to the RadioReference.com Community. All new threads posted here will be moderated by the administrators. Members are encouraged to post news and information here for the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2007, 08:28 PM
Moderator
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,610
Default Sprint Nextel Rejects AT&T Claims Over Spectrum Program

More rebanding news:


Quote:
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Sprint Nextel, Thursday strongly rejected a series of accusations made against it by AT&T over substantial delays in a complicated radio spectrum reallocation program it is engaged in.

Last month, AT&T filed a letter to the Federal Communications Commission pointing out its concerns over the program.

It alleged that Sprint Nextel is willfully dragging its feet and suggested the regulator should consider taking enforcement activity, including the possibility of levying fines, against its rival.

The program sees Sprint Nextel footing the bill in a costly transition in which the cellular company and emergency services are exchanging the spectrum they currently use to underpin their cellular networks to different frequencies.

It is hoped that in doing so, the increasing instances of interference between the legacy Nextel cellular signals and the radio frequencies used by virtually all public safety entities would be greatly reduced or stop altogether.

While on the surface an arcane issue, increasing interference between Sprint Nextel's cellular-phone signals and emergency services' radio signals has the potential to cause mayhem if it causes dropped calls or interference on the emergency network in times of crisis.

As part of a deal reached between Sprint Nextel, the public safety community and the FCC in 2004, the cellular company would pay for the transition and in exchange would receive an additional chunk of national spectrum to support future growth.

But the program is widely seen to be falling significantly behind schedule, with frustrations growing on all sides over the negotiating tactics employed by Sprint Nextel when determining the costs of repositioning individual public safety licensees.

AT&T argued in its filing to the FCC in April that Sprint Nextel's access to the additional spectrum should be restricted until further progress in the rebanding was accomplished and that the FCC should consider further sanctions against the company.

In its own filing to the regulator Thursday, Sprint Nextel said that AT&T's remarks would do nothing to move along the bogged down process.

Sprint Nextel acknowledged that the program has "proven to be more time consuming than anticipated" and that "the process can be frustrating to all stakeholders."

"The Commission should similarly reject AT&T's unjustified attack on Sprint Nextel... and the Commission - and by implication, hundreds of public safety licensees," the statement from Sprint Nextel said.

The FCC estimated the value of the spectrum Sprint Nextel would receive in exchange for funding the transition at $4.86 billion. According to the terms of the original deal, if the transition ultimately cost less, the company would still be on the hook for the full amount with the difference going to the U.S. Treasury.

If, however, the program cost more, Sprint Nextel would have to pay whatever it cost.

So far, Sprint Nextel estimates it will have spent $1.5 billion by the end of the year, but has not publicly disclosed how much it expects the final price tag will be.

Nor can it, nor anyone in the public safety community, estimate how long the transition will take.

Last week, the FCC waded into the matter, clarifying its interpretation of the original rules and admonishing Sprint Nextel for the hardline position it has taken in the negotiations.

It said the company should not have as its primary focus spending as little as possible to maximize the savings to the U.S. Treasury, but completing the program as expeditiously as possible.

Sprint Nextel has been arguing that it has been obliged to adopt its tough negotiating position due to the wording of the original 2004 FCC order.

Also Thursday, the Transition Administrator, the body set up to oversee the process and to deal with the many individual negotiations between Sprint Nextel and various public safety licensees, issued its latest quarterly progress report.

It concludes that "progress continues to be made but has proven to be much more challenging and time-consuming than the reconfiguration of commercial 800 megahertz users."

It urged all the parties involved to "sustain their efforts" and to "continue to work in good faith" if the program is eventually to be successful.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2007, 08:43 PM
stateboy's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,270
Default

Quote:
It is hoped that in doing so, the increasing instances of interference between the legacy Nextel cellular signals and the radio frequencies used by virtually all public safety entities would be greatly reduced or stop altogether.
Virtually all? This crappile just keeps getting deeper and deeper
__________________
South Dakota: The most scanner-phobic gestapo state in the union
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2007, 09:00 PM
bezking's Avatar
Moderator and DB Admin
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,588
Send a message via AIM to bezking
Default

Yeah, really. Enough counterproductive name calling already.

As for 'VIRTUALLY all', whoever wrote that can't add. Last time I checked, 480mHz is nowhere CLOSE to the 860s.
__________________
--bezking
Moderator, NY-NJ DBA, Wiki Admin
bezking @ radioreference.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2007, 10:04 PM
KG4LJF's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Irvine, KY
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via AIM to KG4LJF Send a message via MSN to KG4LJF Send a message via Yahoo to KG4LJF
Default

Man it's something everyday with this mess!
__________________
Realistic Pro-57 (10 channel workhorse)
GRE PSR-500
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2007, 11:10 PM
unitcharlie's Avatar
Kentucky DB Admin...
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: on the road to nonesuch, ky...
Posts: 2,408
Default

At this rate my grandchildren might be the ones who will need rebanded scanners!
__________________
Co-Founder/Active Member of the Central Kentucky Monitoring Team
Opinions based on MY experiences, real AND delusional...
WX4LEX
unitcharlie@radioreference.com

Twitter: CollierLEX18
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2007, 05:44 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 45
Default

Interesting that the position of the writer is that Nextel is dragging their feet to save money to give to the US Treasury. How altruistic. I rather believe that Nextel thinks that if it can come in significantly under the budget set forth by the FCC that they can somehow convince the 'powers' to not force them to contribute the remainder to the Treasury.

So all the dragging their collective arses, obfuscating the issues, claiming to be 'moving along' , is doing, is saving Nextel money?

Someone needs to set some realistic guidelines and enforce them.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 12:27 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 42
Default

It;s interesting that Sprint, who hates Motorola, is doing all this for Nextel and yet Motorola opted to not renew the IDEN system patents they held. Now either IDEN is going away, and taking Nextel with it . Or there is a mutany afoot and someone else id going to be building IDEN phones for Nextel.
Either way, this thing has gotten so big and so out of proportion that I am suprized its' not been scrapped. The only other reasonable option is the 902 to 928 MHz ham band and the issue with that is the last time the FCC took band from the ham's it never got reused. (220 Mhz band) which left a bad taste in everyone's mouth especially the hams. But this is band without a radio. At this point, there are no off the self ham radio's for this band.
__________________
KB8VUL,
Rat Shack
Pro-92 Pro-95, Pro-96 HTX-202 HTX-212
Kenwood
TK-880,840 TS-120 TM-331A TK-3180
Yeasu
FT-726r,767GX,757
Icom
IC-706 MkIIG, 2200
Ranger
RCI-2950, 5054
Uniden
SMU-3031
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 04:28 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 753
Default

902-928 is not a 'Ham Band'. Amateurs are secondary, there. It's an ISM band, standing for 'Industrial, Scientific, and Medical'. It's used for RF heaters (using kilowatt power levels), and many other things. It's also used by quite a few part 15 low power devices, such as wireless phones, a series of Motorola handy-talkies, the new eXRS Handy talkies from TriSquare, and, oh yes, by nextel phones for their 'Direct Talk' function. These HT's are all digital, 1 watt (actually .95 watt, usually, the rule is less than 1 watt).
__________________
N6IMN - GMRS WQGJ903
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2007, 09:46 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 1,583
Default

I have to wonder about Motorola, being "in the biz" and using their product every day. They have stopped all switch R&D in favor of a new, untried, "Universal Base Station" and recently announced they will discontinue the 4812 line of BTS. We have over 700 of them and I know Sprint must have thousands. If they are not going to support switch development vis-a-vis their base stations, why should anybody but them.

Not to mention their dismal performance so far this year in the world handset market (see RCR). I'm glad I didn't buy Moto stock years ago when it was way up there.
__________________
20 wpm Extra
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
San Bernardino County Nextel project on hold kd6ecz California Radio Discussion Forum 3 06-29-2006 12:46 PM
FCC REBANDING Discussion Thread petrol88 General Scanning Forum 499 01-27-2006 12:50 PM
Sprint Near Deal to Buy Nextel for $34 Billion ShawnCowden General Scanning Forum 26 12-17-2004 02:35 AM
Will be watching for 800 MHZ rebanding milf Mississippi Radio Discussion Forum 6 10-27-2004 09:17 PM
FCC Releases 800 MHz Rebanding Order scannerfreak Trunking Forum 14 08-10-2004 12:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions