|
|
|
|
| Connecticut Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Connecticut. |

06-10-2010, 11:46 AM
|
|
|
Eastern CT Hams. Should we do background checks?
OK - it's all public news but I thought I would consolidate things today.
Unfortunately, these are two examples of how the Amateur Radio world is starting to be perceived. Both made front page of Norwich Bulletin
There are plenty of seasoned,. experienced, reliable, and WORTHY ham's out here - let's just remember to check who they are and their intent(s) before joining any our groups. Make sure before you start letting them into your departments, EOC, command posts, and special events, we know they are of sound, moral character.
KB1RBH
Former firefighter charged with Norwich arson - Norwich, CT - Norwich Bulletin
KB1RBI
Norwich man due in court over Walmart gunman prank - Norwich, CT - Norwich Bulletin
73's Kevin
__________________
Kmacinct....
|

06-10-2010, 7:11 PM
|
|
|
RE: Hams
I agree with Kevin and would like to state that there are many hard working good hams and radio enthusiasts
who are great people. Please don't judge the masses by a few bad apples. This happens in all groups and hopefully we are able to weed them out.
I agree that we need to check our people out before allowing them access to sensitive information and positions.
That is enough for now.
Harrison
|

06-10-2010, 7:42 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The 2nd village Anson Phelps founded in CT.
Posts: 563
|
|
Background checks would be good, however how can you tell how a person is going to turn out in the long run. Just because a person has a clean record doesn't mean their law-abiding Joe-Q Public.
I think yes it would be a deterrent but you are still going to get those who may appear fine on paper and slip through the checks and balances.
__________________
Joe "Izzy" Navin
K1JJN
Rigs: BCD396T, BCD996T x 2, BC780XLT x 2, PRO 2006, PRO 2046, BC560XLT, BC350A, Yaesu FT-7800R & VX-6R, TRS-452 & TRS-453.
|

06-10-2010, 9:24 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by izzyj4
Background checks would be good, however how can you tell how a person is going to turn out in the long run. Just because a person has a clean record doesn't mean their law-abiding Joe-Q Public.
I think yes it would be a deterrent but you are still going to get those who may appear fine on paper and slip through the checks and balances.
|
True - but a good background - some good solid references - place to start.
I see TOO MANY agencies these days let 'anyone in' under the theory "we can use any help we get".
These two are a sore for not only our Ham Community, but the other groups they have 'tried' to become members of.
KM
__________________
Kmacinct....
|

06-11-2010, 2:51 PM
|
|
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
|
|
Shack photos
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 191
|
|
Morons
Kevin,
I see these two assclowns have consecutive callsigns and are from similar areas which means they might have tested together. Are they buddies? I wonder if they worked together during these incidents? In anycase they are a serious threat to public safety.
|

06-11-2010, 4:47 PM
|
|
|
IIRC, Keith and Kevin did test together.
|

06-11-2010, 4:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Niagara Region - Canada
Posts: 469
|
|
Welcome to the same kind of dismal prejudices that gun owners have been subject to for decades.
__________________
Gator596
The world is run by those who show up
|

06-11-2010, 7:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 282
|
|
Didn't the eastern area have that kid that was making bombs in his garage?
I thought I saw somewhere they found radios or scanners on him.
Not sure if he was a ham.
I would be fine with the same rules to buy a gun be used for radios and scanners
|

06-11-2010, 8:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Niagara Region - Canada
Posts: 469
|
|
>I would be fine with the same rules to buy a gun be used for radios and scanners
Some folks really don't like the idea. They are not bad people, they just don't like other people presuming they are.
__________________
Gator596
The world is run by those who show up
|

06-11-2010, 8:52 PM
|
|
|
They're not the first hams to go bad, and they certainly won't be the last. It takes all kinds!
__________________
Sic vis pacem, para bellum...
|

06-11-2010, 9:23 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cskib32087
Didn't the eastern area have that kid that was making bombs in his garage?
I thought I saw somewhere they found radios or scanners on him.
Not sure if he was a ham.
I would be fine with the same rules to buy a gun be used for radios and scanners
|
KB1RBH is the one that has been arrested for making the bombs. Yes, eastern Connecticut.
KB1RBI is the one arrested for making the false report.
The first from Colchester, the second from Norwich, CT.
|

06-12-2010, 1:46 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
|
|
background Checks
First, I know Keith and I'm not saying that I am defending him or the other guy that did these stupid things.
Background checks need to be done because we are called upon by many agencies for their help. E.O.C's for every town use Ham radio operators all the time for communications. Homeland Security may not trust us anymore if something is not done. I had to have a background check done for my CDL, Gun Permit and Gaming License. Why not a FEDERAL Communications Commission ( Ham Radio License)?
Anyone that uses a two way radio in a crime, should have the radio's taken away. If you have a Ham License and commit a Felony, they should have all their licenses revoked. I know that this would be after the fact, but I think it is a start.
|

06-12-2010, 10:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Niagara Region - Canada
Posts: 469
|
|
Those creeps should be nailed to the wall. Hard.
The people who have not done anything should not be subject to any increased checks or attention.
To change the rules based on those two idiots would mean the rules were, in effect - written by idiots.
__________________
Gator596
The world is run by those who show up
Last edited by Gator596; 06-12-2010 at 10:24 AM..
|

06-12-2010, 2:32 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cskib32087
Didn't the eastern area have that kid that was making bombs in his garage?
I thought I saw somewhere they found radios or scanners on him.
Not sure if he was a ham.
I would be fine with the same rules to buy a gun be used for radios and scanners
|
Yup they found and took the scanner from him because after lighting the fire he listened to the response on the scanner according to ch. 3 news.
And his buddy the other ham listened to the response of the PD after reporting the man with the gun over Walmarts operation freq.
Here is his orrig. post when they took his scanner away!
Maybe it will turn up on one of those PD auctions someday or one of the officers got a nice gift for his trouble.
CSP Siezed my scanner!!
|

06-12-2010, 10:42 PM
|
|
|
How was the scanner used to perpetrate the crime?
If it wasn't, how was it not stolen by the police.
|

06-13-2010, 2:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 282
|
|
Corrigan45Unit
Didn't know he was the ham on the first post. I remember doing some snooping when he posted the info about his scanner being taken because it didn't sound right. According to the news paper he was in corrigan correctional facility and according to the guards Unit 45 is the Psych ward, So 2+2 = well you can figure it out from the news now.
Im wondering if his web page streaming live CSP is to get back at them for catching him?
|

06-13-2010, 7:15 PM
|
|
|
Oh my I remember him. He started sending me instant messages on like aol I tried to ignore him. Wondered why I hadn't seen him around in a while. Now we know why. Jeesh
|

06-13-2010, 7:17 PM
|
|
|
He told me they gave it back to him. in a instant message. He had sent it away also to Uniden to be repaired.
|

06-15-2010, 1:24 PM
|
 |
Thread Killer
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,039
|
|
There are so many different levels of background checks available, and none are fool proof.
Unless your applying for a law enforcement position or a clearence level with the USGvt, plan on it being a criminal background or wanted check only.
Fingerprints will only verify if they have a criminal history (typically felony level as mis level crimes are not always fingerprinted - especially if done by summons) or if there are unknown prints connected to a crime and in the database to be searched.
Then you have financial backgrounds, personal interviews, employment interviews - some going back YEARS, neighbor and former neighbor interviews, etc etc.
Even with all that, you can still be a closet assclown that just slides under the radar.
__________________
If you have received a PM from me about a submission, kindly reply within 5 days with requested information or your submission may be rejected. Thanks!
|

06-16-2010, 11:40 AM
|
|
|
__________________
Kmacinct....
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|