RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Site Administration Forums > Database Discussion Forum

Database Discussion Forum This forum is for questions about the database such as how to use it, layout or usability issues or suggestions for improvement. It is not for pointing out wrong information or getting help with programming.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2012, 9:05 AM
gr8rcall's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Alamance County, NC
Posts: 705
Exclamation Attn! Admins! P25 Phase II Database Issue!

Sirs,
I noticed that in the database, on Trunking system pages that use Phase II TDMA modulation, it still indicates that that type of modulation Is not monitorable by ANY SCANNER!

Can you change that to indicate that the PSR-800 can monitor those systems, please?

Note: This is not significant to any one system. EVERY Phase II capable system has that false indication!

I quote from the DB: "Some TGs on this system are using Phase II TDMA modulation, which cannot be monitored by any scanner."

Hope we can get this corrected soon!

Sorry if I'm a bearer of sorta bad news...
__________________
Supporter of Broadcastify!
Play "Travel Scrabble" here: Travel Scrabble (Word Game)
Pick your favorite soda!
Don't be fooled, I'm not a LEO!

Last edited by gr8rcall; 11-15-2012 at 9:08 AM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2012, 7:33 PM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 4,393
Default

We are aware that the message needs to be updated.

Functionally, it doesn't really affect anything, it's just a text note.

Let's also keep in mind that the Phase II capability for the PSR-800 is via beta (test) firmware, it hasn't been made final just yet. Yes, it works, but it is still in the testing phase as far as GRE is concerned.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 9:58 AM
gr8rcall's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Alamance County, NC
Posts: 705
Default

Okay! Gotcha'!

Just wanted to be sure you guys knew...

Sorry,
gr8rcall
__________________
Supporter of Broadcastify!
Play "Travel Scrabble" here: Travel Scrabble (Word Game)
Pick your favorite soda!
Don't be fooled, I'm not a LEO!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 10:31 AM
troymail's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Anne Arundel County, MD.
Posts: 2,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chauffeur6 View Post
We are aware that the message needs to be updated.

Functionally, it doesn't really affect anything, it's just a text note.

Let's also keep in mind that the Phase II capability for the PSR-800 is via beta (test) firmware, it hasn't been made final just yet. Yes, it works, but it is still in the testing phase as far as GRE is concerned.
May be BETA..... But I can tell you it works..... I listen every day.
__________________
Future PSR-900 user...(still hoping!)
PSR-800 x 2 | PSR-500
BCD-396T | BC-296D (voice) | BC-245XLT (mTrunker) | BC-600XLT | BC-IV | VX-8R
Not a Radio Shack fan.....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 10:42 AM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 4,393
Default

Yes, I already acknowledged that it works. The point is that the PSR-800 does not ship with that firmware, it must be installed by the end-user. Let's not forget that the first version of the firmware broke X2-TDMA decoding. Anyway, there is no urgency to change the message in the database until GRE releases the firmware as non-beta and officially supports Phase II decoding.

Quote:
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The software included in this archive is experimental beta
software. While some testing has been done to ensure that there are no major issues
with this software, there is always a chance that something may have been missed in
testing that could cause a loss of your current scanner programming. We recommend
that you make a backup of your scanner’s current programming before performing these
upgrades. There will be no official support for these beta versions of firmware and
software.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 11:47 AM
KWs's Avatar
KWs KWs is offline
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kent (Akron) Ohio
Posts: 341
Default

The message could be changed to ..The PSR-800 with beta (test) firmware is currently the only scanner capable of monitoring Phase II TDMA modulation ... I'm pretty sure this message change in the database would only take a minute and keep readers up to date on the technology evolution.
__________________
KWs
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 6:05 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 403
Default

Man, so just because its beta people keep saying its not the truth?. So silly. If it works, it works. Its not a figment of anyone's imagination.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 6:36 PM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 4,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tilt404 View Post
Man, so just because its beta people keep saying its not the truth?. So silly. If it works, it works. Its not a figment of anyone's imagination.
No one ever said it wasn't true. Where on earth are you getting that from? Please, read the entire thread before commenting.

Let me state once and for all: The staff is aware that the message needs to be updated, we know what to update the message with, and we will do so in good time. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 7:17 PM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jefferson County, Ohio
Posts: 3,975
Send a message via MSN to mtindor
Default

I could keep quiet, but I won't. I happen to agree with everyone here except for Chauffer6 If one scanner on the market supports it [even if the support only exists in publically available beta firmware], then the message should indicate that it can be monitored using a particular scanner.

Mike
__________________
Mike / AA8IA
PSR800/PRO197

If you'd like to help me map out the First Energy P25 TRS, PM me
If I PM you about a submission, please reply promptly or your submission may be rejected.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 7:29 PM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 4,393
Default

Except that I never said the message shouldn't be changed, so I'm not quite sure what you are disagreeing with.

I said there was no real urgency to change it.

Anyway, for the last time, Lindsay is aware the message needs updating, he just hasn't gotten around to it yet. And on that note, I'm done with this thread. You guys can continue to argue the moot point if you wish.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 7:41 PM
KD2DLL's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rotterdam, New York
Posts: 456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chauffeur6 View Post
Except that I never said the message shouldn't be changed, so I'm not quite sure what you are disagreeing with.

I said there was no real urgency to change it.

Anyway, for the last time, Lindsay is aware the message needs updating, he just hasn't gotten around to it yet. And on that note, I'm done with this thread. You guys can continue to argue the moot point if you wish.
Like chauffur6 said, there's no urgency. There are plenty more things that admins and Lindsay are working on that are a much higher priority than this. Such as getting broadcasify fully functional, This is a very minor detail.
__________________
Alex Kaczor--- feed@kaczortech.com
Check out my new ham website kd2dll.com
With a scanning forum as well! forums.kd2dll.com
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 7:45 PM
Highpockets's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, New Jersey
Posts: 3,709
Send a message via AIM to Highpockets
Default

gr8rcall,

See what you started.
__________________
Steve
BC785D ~ BCD396XT ~ BCD996XT ~ PSR600
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 7:53 PM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 4,393
Default

I'm going to apologize if I came across as being dismissive towards the issue.

I agree that the message should be changed, regardless of the beta status of the firmware. We actually have discussed changing the message already, over a month ago. Maybe my "attitude" was just my frustration that the message hasn't been changed yet.

Thanks to gr8rcall for keeping us on our toes (you have nothing to be sorry about), and for everyone else's suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2012, 8:18 PM
gr8rcall's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Alamance County, NC
Posts: 705
Default

Yeah,
Just wanted to avoid the average person who is looking to buy a scanner, going to that page and saying, "Oh no, I can't monitor them!"
When in fact they can!

Chauffer6,
No you didn't come across as being dismissive at all! You stated in your first post that the team was aware if the problem!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highpockets View Post
gr8rcall,

See what you started.
HaHa! I'm always the troublemaker! (I'm kidding okay!!!???)
__________________
Supporter of Broadcastify!
Play "Travel Scrabble" here: Travel Scrabble (Word Game)
Pick your favorite soda!
Don't be fooled, I'm not a LEO!

Last edited by gr8rcall; 11-16-2012 at 8:20 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2012, 2:09 AM
MaxTracker's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bonham, Texas
Posts: 2,173
Default

A similar problem with P25 is that P25 conventional can use individual talk groups on the same channel. Where TG-0001 is Dispatch and TG-0003 is Secure .... The scanner itself wont distinguish the Talk groups but just decode the modulation in use on that frequency. One of the option relayed to me was to put that info regarding a specific radio system or conventional channel in the Radio Reference Wiki. Might be something you might consider ...
__________________
MaxTracker
RR Feed: Texoma Regional Public Safety
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2012, 8:28 AM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 4,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxTracker View Post
A similar problem with P25 is that P25 conventional can use individual talk groups on the same channel. Where TG-0001 is Dispatch and TG-0003 is Secure .... The scanner itself wont distinguish the Talk groups but just decode the modulation in use on that frequency. One of the option relayed to me was to put that info regarding a specific radio system or conventional channel in the Radio Reference Wiki. Might be something you might consider ...
That's not a similar problem at all. In fact, it's completely unrelated. Are you sure you posted in the right thread?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2012, 5:40 PM
MaxTracker's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bonham, Texas
Posts: 2,173
Default

You completely missed the point - feel free to delete the post
__________________
MaxTracker
RR Feed: Texoma Regional Public Safety
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions