|
|
|
|
| Digital Signals Decoding Discussions regarding decoding digital signals on the HF bands, including HFDL, ALE, RTTY, CW, and others. |

02-18-2008, 12:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
|
|
Using a TNC to decode
How many of you gents use one in your shack? I thinking about getting on to tool around in HF. Looking on ebay it may just be cheaper to get a older TNC rather than a lvl4 FSK decoder. Any ideas?
__________________
"There is no shame in not knowing: the shame lies in not finding out" Master P
|

02-18-2008, 01:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 186
|
|
I've had my eye on the TNC-X, it's PIC-based and very affordable. Official site is tnc-x.com
|

02-18-2008, 01:51 PM
|
|
Wiki Admin
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Burnie, Md.
Posts: 8,959
|
|
The problem with these old TNCs is that many of them have not been updated for newer modes in years (The M7000 is a classic example). Even the venerable PK232 now has, in their newer versions, a soundcard input, probably in recognition of the many new modes that have come on the air of late.
You're far better off getting a soundcard driven software package than a dedicated TNC. However, for very specific apps such as FAX decoding, a TNC might do a better job due to the additional filtering some of them have.
It does depend on what you are trying to hear. For example, marine stuff can generally be copied with something along the lines of SeaTTY; for all the new ALE stuff that's out there, and coming out, PC-ALE (which is freeware) is a very inexpensive way to get your foot in the door without a lot of cost. You can later step up to software like SkySweeper (which in it's basic form, is still quite powerful, and not that expensive..).
Mike Chace-Ortiz's website has numerous links for just such software - the link for his site is in the Utility Monitoring wiki. Of course, this assumes you have a good desktop radio - you can get by with portables, but only to a point. Weaker stations, or those with interference, will quickly show the portable's limitations. Some of the better PC driven radios (like the RX320 from TenTec) are also quite good for digital decoding.
73s Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
Wiki Administrator, HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
|

02-18-2008, 02:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
|
|
I'm using PDW as on now off the PCR-1000 and have had success. I'll be checking out that site.
__________________
"There is no shame in not knowing: the shame lies in not finding out" Master P
|

02-18-2008, 04:05 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Belvidere IL
Posts: 175
|
|
I you want a nice multimode decoder, try Ham Radio Deluxe Plug your radio into the sound card, open the DM780 program that comes with HRD... It decodes several modes.
|

02-18-2008, 07:17 PM
|
|
Wiki Admin
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Burnie, Md.
Posts: 8,959
|
|
While I agree programs like DM780 and MixW are very good, they're generally oriented toward ham ops - stations outside the ham bands (not necessarily MARS related), don't use things like PSK31, Clover or other modes like that - and that's an issue, particularly for newcomers. They think that they can just tune in with any mode and expect it to work. Digital decoding simply doesn't work that way. All they get is gibberish, and quickly lose interest.
I highly recommend folks that are interested in Digital HF DXing join groups like the Utility DXers Forum (Yahoo) - there you can get a very good idea of what modes are being used, and the equipment or software used for decoding.
73s Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
Wiki Administrator, HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
|

02-22-2008, 02:29 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
Posts: 4,124
|
|
Why bother with hardware when everything is software driven? Digital radio is as easy as getting on the internet these days, your sound card is your modem.
__________________
73 de Warren
Amateur Radio KB2VXA
Station powered by atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.
|

02-24-2008, 05:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 705
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kb2vxa
Why bother with hardware when everything is software driven? Digital radio is as easy as getting on the internet these days, your sound card is your modem.
|
I agree...
Check out AGWPE.
|

02-25-2008, 06:16 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Old Monroe,MO
Posts: 254
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kb2vxa
Why bother with hardware when everything is software driven? Digital radio is as easy as getting on the internet these days, your sound card is your modem.
|
totally correct!!!!!!!! You are only limited by what software you use and how much your sound card can decode. Listen and listen and hopefully find lots to decode. most software tells you how to set it up--one mistake i was making, you can run too much volume into the programs---it will tell you that usually...
The reason you need the interfaces (since most people have computers these days) TNC, Rigblaster,etc, is if you want to send (broadcast) in a certain mode, and you must be licensed to legally do that.......
__________________
Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.
Thomas A. Edison
|

02-25-2008, 08:51 PM
|
|
Wiki Admin
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Glen Burnie, Md.
Posts: 8,959
|
|
What you all have written is right on the money, but it misses the point - all these neat packages are really geared for ham usage. There are many other modes that aren't common - or even used - by hams on HF, and some of these (like Link11) cannot be decoded.
The only software (within reach of the average listener, anyway) that addresses these modes is SkySweeper. There are several more expensive packages (Hoka Code 300 for example) that cover even more modes and have more technical capabilities. Something like that would undoubtedly overwhelm someone who is new to the hobby. This is why research, and more specifically learning about what is being heard and read on reflectors such as the Utility DXers Forum, is absolutely critical. It will at least slow down the frustration factor.
73s Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
Wiki Administrator, HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
|

02-26-2008, 04:02 PM
|
|
|
A TNC is pretty much useless on HF. If you want to do digital decoding you would be better off with one of the many sound card software packages. A TNC will give you 300baud packet and little more.
|

04-28-2009, 05:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego county
Posts: 127
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kb2vxa
Why bother with hardware when everything is software driven? Digital radio is as easy as getting on the internet these days, your sound card is your modem.
|
Awesome Geek Blog: File transfer over sound card
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|