Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Topic Specific Forums > Federal Monitoring Forum


Federal Monitoring Forum The place to discuss monitoring federal government communications and related topics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2009, 09:56 PM
signal500's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 103
Question 162.350

About ten months ago I monitored a surveillance on a major interstate here in NW Florida. The frequency was 162.350 analog simplex with a PL 167.9 "in the clear" of course. These guys were using profanity with every transmission. I have heard many things over the past 27 years but never with this much profanity. Have any of you monitored agents constantly using profanity during a federal surveillance? Maybe they thought they were encrypted.
__________________
Signal 500
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2009, 10:12 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 263
Default

For the 35+ years I've monitored federal, I have not heard much profanity from federal law enforcement Special Agents. State, county and local task force members that use federal radio systems are more inclined to do so.

What was the nature of the surveillance? Interstate theft, drugs, bank robbery, organized crime?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2009, 10:40 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,226
Default

167. 9 is /was FBI
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2009, 12:38 AM
signal500's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squad10 View Post
What was the nature of the surveillance? Interstate theft, drugs, bank robbery, organized crime?
I have no idea.
__________________
Signal 500
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2009, 05:51 AM
MOTOROLANUT's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CKB, WV
Posts: 432
Wink Foul Talk

We are all Human.....Even the FBI....In any Academy setting profanity = pushups...LOL
But when you hit the streets; you become a product of your environment.
You should at least get a laugh from it...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2009, 07:11 AM
SOFA_KING's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 625
Default

Over the years I have heard some real bad language at times. Disgusting stuff too. Stress relief? Maybe...But it wasn't just the profanity. The actual attitude displayed was shocking. Some of these guys had a god complex. It is not always that bad, and most have some minor profanity. It's a look into their world when they are so candid about what they are doing and think no one is listening. Sometimes the sense of humor is very funny.

Not long ago I heard a guy ask another guy if he would lend him his portable. He replied with, "Not if you're going to spread your germs on it.". A few minutes later you heard coughing and hacking into the portable radio at the end of a transmission. The other guy said, "You can keep that radio". Tension breakers I would guess. Best scanner listening ever when they are so open about everything. I never hear that on local or state PD unless they are on a "Private Call". Even then it is not as casual.

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2009, 05:21 PM
W4KRR's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 2,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by signal500 View Post
About ten months ago I monitored a surveillance on a major interstate here in NW Florida. The frequency was 162.350 analog simplex with a PL 167.9 "in the clear" of course. These guys were using profanity with every transmission. I have heard many things over the past 27 years but never with this much profanity. Have any of you monitored agents constantly using profanity during a federal surveillance? Maybe they thought they were encrypted.
Just the other night, there were some agents following a vehicle a few miles from where I live (in south Florida). The frequency was 164.9625, PL 100.0. They followed the vehicle into a residential neighborhood, and shortly after, became lost. They were sure using lots of profanity as they tried to figure out how to get out of that neighborhood and back onto the main road. That was the only time I have ever heard anything like that on a Federal channel.

Not positive who the users were, the frequency was either simplex or possibly a repeater input.
__________________
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2009, 05:52 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 195
Default

I monitored a DEA surveillance where there seemed to be some kind on animosity between one guy and his fellow agents. He seemed to be upset about the other's comment and went into a long string of four letter words and went into a rampage until the "boss" told them to "quiet up". I was suprised to hear that much friction, especially at that time.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2009, 07:24 PM
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W4KRR View Post
Just the other night, there were some agents following a vehicle a few miles from where I live (in south Florida). The frequency was 164.9625, PL 100.0. They followed the vehicle into a residential neighborhood, and shortly after, became lost. They were sure using lots of profanity as they tried to figure out how to get out of that neighborhood and back onto the main road. That was the only time I have ever heard anything like that on a Federal channel.

Not positive who the users were, the frequency was either simplex or possibly a repeater input.
MT Fed Files: Search results for 164.9625 air marine Probably US Customs, especially w/ that PL tone.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2009, 08:38 AM
SOFA_KING's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligan View Post
MT Fed Files: Search results for 164.9625 air marine Probably US Customs, especially w/ that PL tone.
This is a well known, been used for decades, Customs simplex freq in S. FL known as TAC 21.

Phil
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions