RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Service Specific Monitoring > Federal Monitoring Forum


Federal Monitoring Forum - The place to discuss monitoring federal government communications and related topics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2011, 8:44 PM
Hooligan's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clark County, Nevada
Posts: 1,126
Cool NatGeo program: Secret Service Files -- Frontline New York City

Sunday & Monday evenings, the National Geographic Channel aired some new documentaries called "SECRET SERVICE FILES,"obviously about the US Secret Service. Actually, they were mostly new -- I've watched the first two episodes & they shared some footage, plus used some canned footage from other recent NatGeo specials about the USSS, AF1, etc.


Anyway, the second episode Sunday night was titled Secret Service Files -- Frontline New York City
Secret Service Files | Frontline New York City | National Geographic Channel

It focused on the NY/NJ Electronic Crimes Task Force, particularly the USSS NY Field Office's involvement, as well as the Counterfeit Squad. In addition to the usual stuff, it was very nice to see the Technical Operations Squad & some of their specialized equipment & techniques covered. At times, and certainly upon the request of the USSS, certain things were blurred out for security reasons. That's to be expected when an operation employing sensitive techniques, equipment & personnel provides good access to the media, & I appreciate that.

The final segment of this particular episode involved the controlled delivery of a baby photo album that'd been intercepted (apparently via DHL) & found to contain counterfeit US currency. The SS NY Counterfeit Squad re-packaged the evidence & was going to make a controlled delivery with the assistance of the Technical Ops Squad, in order to build a good case against the addressee of the package.

TOS dressed-up the undercover agent as a USPS employee. Actually, to be specific, they put a USPS shirt on the UC agent -- not exactly a complete letter-carrier uniform, and this is all despite the original package apparently being shipped via DHL. TOS wired the UC up with an RF body-wire for audio, and he was also wearing a separate video device, though I'm not sure if the video was fed live via RF or just recorded on the UC's person. Most video bugs capable of live feeds can transmit audio on that same 900MHz spread-spectrum or microwave link, so it's possible they used a separate, audio-only body-bug so that all agents involved in the op could monitor the bug freq & hear the arrest or duress signal directly from the UC.

TOS set up their surveillance van across the street from the door of the commercial business the package was addressed to, and had an arrest team in the vicinity.

The UC banged on the door, the package addressee opened the door & was thankfully too stupid to notice the letter-carrier wasn't in full uniform & had his shirt hanging out (perhaps that's normal for NYC?), didn't have a satchel with any other mail in it, nor had a marked USPS vehicle parked anywhere in view. Upon signing for the package, the UC gave a code-phrase for the arrest which TOS in the surveillance van heard over the body-wire, and the arrest-team moved in, placing the surprised guy in custody.

Every USSS agent is cross-trained in protective ops no matter what their normal job function is, and one of the primary tenets of protective ops is attention to detail -- noticing everything of potential significance no matter how small. Protective intelligence & operational security are also matters that the USSS prides itself as being very cognizant of & good at, so it's a reasonable assumption that the USSS had experts review at least the finished NatGeo product, if not all raw footage, and had the program producers censor or at least disguise (blur-out) certain individuals, locations and other things sensitive to the USSS missions.

So therefore, I guess we can assume that USSS did NOT make a clumsy mistake by not having the radio frequency 165.7875MHz ("Baker" channel") tuned-in on what looked like an Icom R-8500 receiver in the TOS surveillance van blurred-out & easily visible to anyone watching the show in high definition! Best (or worst) of all, you can even see the freq visible in the short promo segment that NatGeo has on their web page:

Secret Service Files | Frontline New York City | National Geographic Channel

An easy assumption is that the Baker channel is what was used by the UC's body-wire, thus monitored by the receiver in the surveillance van. I'm sure USSS has the ability to run RF wires on other frequencies as well, but it's beyond my comprehension why the USSS would not want that freq blurred-out, so that technically-savvy addressees of contraband material investigated by the USSS wouldn't use a scanner to monitor that frequency to thwart USSS controlled-delivery operations as well as general surveillance. In this scenario, it doesn't matter if they're using encryption or not for a savvy bad-guy to burn the operation (the R-8500 can't decode encryption...) -- the RF body bug was probably unencrypted, analog or P-25 audio, & agent surveillance comms would have been secure or non-secure P-25 on one of the usual, well-known USSS VHF radio channels they've been using for many decades.

I've noticed this same sort of thing occasionally happening with state or local PDs depicted doing surveillance with body-wires on 'Cops' & similar TV programs over the years, but I expected better attention to OPSEC detail from the United States Secret Service.
__________________
I am the King of All Monitoring.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2011, 8:52 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 974
Default

Wow. Just wow.... makes you wonder...
Expecially in a place like NYC, you'd think they would focus even more on these details...

Good post though, with some good information. I'm gunna go see if I can find it on demand tonight.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2011, 8:21 AM
MississippiPI's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: All over the Great State of Mississippi
Posts: 504
Default

I saw those shows, my ole TVO records them--pretty dood show--what kind of radios do they use?


Be safe
__________________
MississippiPi
All over The Great State of Mississippi
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2011, 5:24 PM
daparker_nyc's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 43
Default

I remember a few years ago while I was scanning the USSS frequencies from my office in lower Manhattan, I came across an unencrypted transmission from someone obviously being wired for an upcoming operation. I think the guy was ticklish!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2011, 10:31 PM
Hooligan's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clark County, Nevada
Posts: 1,126
Default

Just FYI, a friend of mine with a "New York state of mind" informed me that:

1. USPS Letter carriers in NYC often dress sloppy.
2. DHL gave-up on trying to compete with UPS & FedEx in NYC, and apparently does rely on USPS as the final carrier to the destination. I doubt USPS re-packages the items, and the USSS program did show the bright yellow & red DHL box the counterfeit currency came in at the USSS FO, but the material was re-packaged in a plain box by the USSS for the controlled-delivery/bust.
__________________
I am the King of All Monitoring.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2011, 11:30 AM
xts3000r
Guest
   
Posts: n/a
Default

the radios where xts5000. vhf. back 5 years ago it would have been the astro saber.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2011, 9:41 PM
mike_s104's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Berkeley Co. WV/ Loudoun Co. VA
Posts: 4,663
Default

I read this post very quickly and didn't catch the frequency mentioned. We just watched it and I saw the same thing. Little after 43 mins.

Last edited by mike_s104; 07-22-2011 at 8:59 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2011, 9:59 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 559
Default

If you watch that scene closely you can also determine the GPS is showing a tracker in Miami that they're playing off as being from NY; so everything you see in that episode may not be exactly as it appears.
__________________
Amateur Extra Icom IC-7200, ID-5100, 92AD Yaesu FT-7800, FT-2900, FT-270, Tytera MD-380 (hacked) Kinetic SBS-1eR, RTLSDR, FlightAware SDR Uniden996T, RS Pro-668, Pro-652, Pro-106, Pro-164, Pro-95
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:36 PM
mike_s104's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Berkeley Co. WV/ Loudoun Co. VA
Posts: 4,663
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canav844 View Post
If you watch that scene closely you can also determine the GPS is showing a tracker in Miami that they're playing off as being from NY; so everything you see in that episode may not be exactly as it appears.
Same as other shows like that. Manhunters does the same thing. We just watched 3 of the 4 episodes and they reuse footage for all from all. Also, a few of those agents needs to work on their concealed carry. A lot have printing that is VERY obvious. I can help them find some better holsters.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2011, 6:02 PM
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,480
Default

If you watch closely on that controlled delivery footage, the production seems a little too clean for me. I can't say for sure but I wouldn't be surprised if that whole exercise was staged. Consider where the TV cameras have to be to get some of those shots. [Tin foil hat off.]
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2011, 11:44 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericcarlson View Post
If you watch closely on that controlled delivery footage, the production seems a little too clean for me. I can't say for sure but I wouldn't be surprised if that whole exercise was staged. Consider where the TV cameras have to be to get some of those shots. [Tin foil hat off.]
You may very well be correct.

When I was in the police academy, one of our instructors was very fond of occasionally showing clips from shows like COPS, etc. We would discuss what we saw as a class after each video. Many times, the instructor would point out that what we had just seen was staged for training, and then would explain what we could have looked/listened for in order to determine that. It became an interesting challenge to try to figure out which scenes were real and which were training videos. One of the easiest giveaways to spot was when a suspect who was a good distance from the officer had perfect audio on camera...because he/she was already wired with a mic or had one hidden in the vehicle, in clothing, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2018, 5:58 PM
Hooligan's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clark County, Nevada
Posts: 1,126
Default

Resurrecting the old thread to post this because we'll want to watch & study the new SS documentay for the same reasons the last ones were of interest.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/ho...nal-Geographic
__________________
I am the King of All Monitoring.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions