Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > General Scanning Forum


General Scanning Forum General forum for the discussion of radio communications related information, including discussion regarding scanners and radio receivers. Location specific posts should be directed to the regional forums listed below.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2009, 08:22 PM
squeakfour's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: strathroy ontario
Posts: 138
Default Encription, is that really Legal

Encription, I wounder if that is legal, for the public paid services enventually to seperate them self from the public. I agree with some encription, but not general public safety radio traffic. Wounder if the Goverment was challenged on this. Contact the M.P., have some one really look into this.
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2009, 09:46 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 951
Default

Don't know about the law in Canada, but in the U.S., there are very specific laws which give private citizens access to certain government records, documents, meetings, etc. Public service communications are not among those things listed anywhere that I'm aware of. Certainly no such right federally nor in Wisconsin.

Dick
__________________
WD9GRI
Milwaukee, WI
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:19 AM
n1das's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 337
Exclamation

EncrYption
__________________
David Sterrett
Nashua, NH
Ham [HA] = N1DAS (2/1984)
GMRS [ZA] = KAE9013 (12/1992)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:38 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squeakfour View Post
Encription, I wounder if that is legal, for the public paid services enventually to seperate them self from the public. I agree with some encription, but not general public safety radio traffic. Wounder if the Goverment was challenged on this. Contact the M.P., have some one really look into this.
I wish they would get rid of encrypted. I can see it sometimes for security reasons my local PD has securenet and me and a few other guys have tried to crack it but it just changes the encryption code on every encrypted transmission it would take us years to figure it out. I heard that the officers get on there though and abuse it and talk about non law enforcement related stuff which could get them in trouble since every bit of traffic is recorded.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 05:05 AM
squeakfour's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: strathroy ontario
Posts: 138
Default

I think that some one should start looking into this,a pro that has goverment experence and the time and money, to do the research or any M.P. that is pro scanning, I think that most will think its just eves dropping, lets say if every one had scanners with the public ears and eyes ,criminals will have a hard time getting away for still most of us are still honest. The London police chiefs argument was that the public was at the accident scene before they were, there are 300,000 cars in london and some are bound to be at the scence before they are, more by chance. But as for the goverment, give them [the public]something to listen to or they will get it another way, this aready shows with trying to crack securenet, that as time goes on , home computors are becoming more powerful each year, the U.S. satilite receiver, that signal has just been changed, but before that people were down loading files off the internet and got it up and running, the same will happen with scanning unless some channels are kept open to the public.
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 06:57 AM
W4KRR's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 2,140
Default

I think what you're saying is that someone should challenge the use of encryption by public safety agencies. In other words, you believe encryption use by public safety should be outlawed. That's not gonna happen. Public Safety users have every right to encrypt their channels if they wish. On the other hand, you have no "right" to monitor any of their transmissions in the first place.
__________________
Ken
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:26 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squeakfour View Post
. . have some one really look into this.
Good idea. YOU should do that.
Write back when you finish.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:32 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scannerboy65301 View Post
I wish they would get rid of encrypted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scannerboy65301 View Post
I can see it sometimes for security reasons my local PD has securenet
Make up your mind!
Quote:
Originally Posted by scannerboy65301 View Post
I heard that the officers get on there though and abuse it and talk about non law enforcement related stuff which could get them in trouble since every bit of traffic is recorded.
Just where did you hear that?
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:49 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 10,300
Default Thread Closed

Based on the OP's question and position on the matter, this is not a General Scanning topic. It would be better re-posted in the Eastern Canada forum.
__________________
Lou Maag

Rules and Guidelines for Forum Post Content
Sponsored links
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aspectos legales y aduanales (legal and customs issues) rwildcat Mexico Radio Discussion Forum 2 Yesterday 02:45 AM
FT: XP Professional for XP SP3 (both legal) WouffHong Old Classifieds Archives 3 01-18-2009 12:43 PM
Is It Legal To Rebroadcast ronmicha Tennessee Radio Discussion Forum 15 12-08-2005 10:15 AM
LEGAL INFO NEEDED STROKINV8 Texas Radio Discussion Forum 13 11-09-2004 07:23 AM
legal info STROKINV8 General Scanning Forum 2 10-27-2004 10:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions