RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > GRE Scanners


GRE Scanners A forum for the discussion of all GRE branded scanning radios and receivers.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2013, 9:02 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Preble County Ohio
Posts: 60
Default Advanced DSP Settings in PSR-800 EZ Scan

Greetings,

That I know of, little is written about these settings and since the manual suggests not changing them unless directed by Support I'm inquiring here on the forum rather than tinkering.

Most of my trunk scanning is within Ohio Marcs where I pick-and-choose between two neighboring sites. Whether using my rubber duck or a mag-mount in my car there are times when transmissions get a little garbled. The signal strength meter shows 3-to-4 bars on these sites. I've come to accept it but recently began scanning a Montgomery Co system whose site is in a relatively similar distance as one of my Ohio MARCS sites, yet the Montgomery Co system sounds flawless. So I am asking if changing those DSP settings could positively impact the reception or audio on the MARCS system. Can you share your experiences and knowledge? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
        
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2013, 7:38 AM
TedRHayes's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bfletcher View Post
Greetings,

That I know of, little is written about these settings and since the manual suggests not changing them unless directed by Support I'm inquiring here on the forum rather than tinkering.

Most of my trunk scanning is within Ohio Marcs where I pick-and-choose between two neighboring sites. Whether using my rubber duck or a mag-mount in my car there are times when transmissions get a little garbled. The signal strength meter shows 3-to-4 bars on these sites. I've come to accept it but recently began scanning a Montgomery Co system whose site is in a relatively similar distance as one of my Ohio MARCS sites, yet the Montgomery Co system sounds flawless. So I am asking if changing those DSP settings could positively impact the reception or audio on the MARCS system. Can you share your experiences and knowledge? Thanks.
There is one big difference between the Montgomery Co system and the Ohio MARCS system. The broadcast on the Montgomery Co system are Analog, the broadcast on the Ohio MARCS are P25 digital. As such I'm sure the DSP processes the signal very differently. If you don't have a strong enough signal, the DSP will have trouble decoding the P25.

I don't know what effect changing the DSP settings would have.

I would suggest that you consider adjusting the "Data Decode Thresholds" settings under the Trunked Radio Systems tab/Site Details for the Ohio MARCS system. This can impact which "site" is used when signals are detected. I typically use Low: 88, High: 95. That may assure you get the strongest signal.

Hope that helps.

Ted
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions