|
|
|
|
| Greater Los Angeles & Inland Areas Discussion Local area specific discussion for Los Angeles and its outlying areas such as Ventura and Orange Counties, and the Inland Empire area. |

10-21-2012, 7:23 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 793
|
|
Linking LAFD - LACoFD Dispatch Centers
Some recent LAFD delayed response incidents including a death have brought back the idea of linking LAFD and LACoFD dispatch centers to create a single regional automatic aid dispatching model regardless of boundaries.
As far back as 1979 the agencies had agreed to pursue the concept but due to politics and cost the matter never was fully developed.
Recently completed study found that in various areas of the city, county firehouses were closer and could have responded quicker. By adopting a seamless and borderless 911 response system by the fire agencies would benefit residents in the city of Los Angeles.
Story:
LAFD's delayed 911 response a matter of geography and jurisdictions - latimes.com
=
Last edited by LAflyer; 10-21-2012 at 9:12 PM..
|

10-22-2012, 1:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,634
|
|
If they wanted to do it, it would have gotten done. Same with AVL, etc.
|

10-22-2012, 11:16 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 793
|
|
I think if you can get the politics and personal egos out of the picture, the concept can definitely work from technology side.
As the article points out other California areas such as Orange County, San Diego and San Jose area have already adopted such seamless cross-border dispatching.
It seems to me LA basin is very extremely well suited for such a concept as our map is full of isolated geographic islands.
As the study showed areas such as those bordering West Hollywood, Eastern Los Angeles and the long thin strip of the city has from South L.A. to the Harbor consistently saw longer-than-average response times by the LAFD, while the County often had multiple stations nearby.
|

10-23-2012, 12:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North of Rock, South of Hard Place.
Posts: 158
|
|
Listen, its all well and good, but I can tell you from first hand experience, guys don't get out of the barn to run EMS calls in someone else's jurisdiction. I won't say who the departments are, but there's an automatic aid agreement that ANY call within a half mile of the district line gets units from *both* departments. But, Department A complains that Department B *NEVER* arrives first on EMS calls on *either* side of the line. Half the time, they're only getting toned out by the time Department A arrives on scene.
But if it's a fire, Department B blasts out the door and usually beats Department A.
|

10-23-2012, 7:32 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kern County, CA
Posts: 1,249
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Code20Photog
Listen, its all well and good, but I can tell you from first hand experience, guys don't get out of the barn to run EMS calls in someone else's jurisdiction. I won't say who the departments are, but there's an automatic aid agreement that ANY call within a half mile of the district line gets units from *both* departments. But, Department A complains that Department B *NEVER* arrives first on EMS calls on *either* side of the line. Half the time, they're only getting toned out by the time Department A arrives on scene.
But if it's a fire, Department B blasts out the door and usually beats Department A.
|
What they need is a JPA, Joint Powers Agreement. The closest unit gets the call in the JPA area Be it city or county. When you send both to see who gets there first to that could bring up the it's not my area. I have never seen anyone go slow because a call is not in their area. Try to beat someone into a call that is in their area, that happens all the time. It is always good to be able to say we beat you into your call. It is a matter of pride. I have been on a few of the we beat you in to your call runs.
|

10-23-2012, 8:41 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Soledad, CA
Posts: 1,176
|
|
It's to be they don't do it. Monterey and Santa Cruz counties have a consolidated dispatch centers they dispatch for all cities and the unincorporated areas of the county well beside SRA Cal fire contract areas.
__________________
still a noob in scanners
|

10-23-2012, 9:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North of Rock, South of Hard Place.
Posts: 158
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eng74
I have never seen anyone go slow because a call is not in their area. Try to beat someone into a call that is in their area, that happens all the time. It is always good to be able to say we beat you into your call. It is a matter of pride.
|
Spend some time in Los Angeles. I've seen and personally been a part of sandbagging on runs, not clearing on the radio from the hospital when a calls goes out, and even some things that may be borderline illegal, just to get another department to handle a EMS call.
Guys hate most EMS runs, plain and simple. Of course there are exceptions, but the majority of FDs I've spent thousands of hours with, as a private EMS EMT, Paramedic trainee, and now as a member of the media, don't set any land speed records on most EMS calls.
I understand pride, and I've seen some great firefighters that still have it. But I've seen exponentially more who are in the job for the paycheck, the boat, lifted 4x4 (with "bad boy" sticker) and the hot nurses.
A busy squad or RA in LA can run 20+ runs a day, some even more. Burnout is rampant, automatic aid, JPA agreement, whatever, isn't going to change that.
|

10-24-2012, 2:14 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: On the right side of California (geographical, not political)
Posts: 2,575
|
|
A joint city/county dispatch center would not include the departments of the 87 other cities in the county that haven't contracted with the county. El Segundo, Torrance, Pasadena, Glendale, the list goes on. It isn't entirely seamless, but in wildland firefighting outside of L.A. County and perhaps outside of urban areas in general, the closest resource available principle seems to work quite well.
I can't speak about more urban counties as I haven't lived or worked in one since my early years in L.A. I'm not sure if the wildland fire agencies and local fire departments work cooperatively or not.
I can't imagine how a county wide fire agency dispatch center could work given the number of entities involved.
__________________
Began as a donnowhatiwannabe, moved on to a wannabe, became abe, now I'm a wasabe.
"Using a drip torch is as much fun as you can have while standing up."
Last edited by Exsmokey; 10-24-2012 at 2:17 AM..
|

10-24-2012, 1:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 793
|
|
Well we do have some local models to look at -- both Verdugo and South Bay are JPA's that provide seamless and and as required borderless fire/ems dispatching to their member cities.
While I am sure the LA City and LA County agreement could be a political football, technology wise I don't see it being too difficult to develop a complete unified station database and activity monitor to be utilized in dispatching the closest unit regardless of geographic borders.
|

10-24-2012, 2:38 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: On the right side of California (geographical, not political)
Posts: 2,575
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAflyer
Well we do have some local models to look at -- both Verdugo and South Bay are JPA's that provide seamless and and as required borderless fire/ems dispatching to their member cities.
While I am sure the LA City and LA County agreement could be a political football, technology wise I don't see it being too difficult to develop a complete unified station database and activity monitor to be utilized in dispatching the closest unit regardless of geographic borders.
|
Verdugo and South Bay cover relatively small areas of L.A. County with some of the cities in those JPAs being much smaller than one LFD or LAC battalion. A county wide fire dispatch center could take up a room as large as the inside of a Home Depot or larger. Then the advantage of co-locating would be lost as dispatchers would be calling each other on the phone or looking at their computer screens to communicate. It would seem that having everyone retain their existing facilities and looking at integrating the computer systems of all might be more realistic. I think a lot is lost when you have large, interagency centers and have dispatchers handling different agencies during a shift depending on traffic volume. Dispatcher knowledge of local areas is lost and the outcome can be a lower quality performance by a department.
__________________
Began as a donnowhatiwannabe, moved on to a wannabe, became abe, now I'm a wasabe.
"Using a drip torch is as much fun as you can have while standing up."
|

10-24-2012, 7:23 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 793
|
|
No I agree, there is no need for physical relocation. Let LAFD stay at their new home, and LACo at theirs
Its more an IT project to get them to work 911 calls utilizing the closest available unit regardless of agency affiliation.
|

10-25-2012, 5:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Orange County,Ca
Posts: 93
|
|
It"ll be a cold day you know where before these two prominent fire agencies agree to dispatch under one roof.
Merger discussions would break down before it could be decided where the new center would be located.. Downtown or East L.A? In the city or a district suburb?
But seriously the most we will likely see will be some kind of CAD-to-CAD link between the two.
|

10-26-2012, 7:22 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington MA
Posts: 2,414
|
|
Exsmokey - this https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...fN1p0T2c#gid=0 might answer your question somewhat. If you look at the southern Georgia area, there are some county FDs that are the only FD in the county. Therefore, if they coordinate well with Georgia Forestry Commission, they have good integrated countywide fire dispatch (for both structural and wildfire).
Your comment might boil down to - "which countys in the USA have the fewest fire dispatch centers, and have dropped all boundaries"? Maybe Fresno County CA - maybe DeKalb County GA - maybe Fairfax County VA (just County FD and CIA FD :-) - maybe Prince Georges County MD (just County FD + Andrews AFB)
Lets make this even more interesting. "Which county in the USA has the fewest fire dispatch centers, boundary drops, a integrated radio system, standardized SOPs, and common training?"
|

10-26-2012, 12:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|

Premium Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North of Rock, South of Hard Place.
Posts: 158
|
|
If you look at Ventura County, just north of LA, the county dispatch center dispatches all the fire departments with the exception of Oxnard, and all of the ambulances in the county with an integrated radio system. Ironically, they dispatch Gold Coast Ambulance for Oxnard FD, even though Oxnard continues to hold out turning over their dispatch to Ventura County. They also tone out Federal Fire for off base responses, which doesn't actually go to their stations, it goes to their dispatch center, and they in turn tone out the response to the appropriate station.
Again, it's not going to be about the actually system, it's going to come down to the attitude of those responding.
|

10-26-2012, 8:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 508
|
|
That study was 40 years ago and the area has grown by 3x and the in fighting is still there.
|

10-26-2012, 8:20 PM
|
|
|
Careful, you'll get in trouble for spilling the beans. I'm on the other side of the country and the story isn't much different. Very, very, few people get into the fire service because they want to run EMS calls. In many systems, it's the new guys that get "stuck" on the ambulance and they bail as soon as they have enough seniority.
They do it because it's part of the job and if most FDs didn't do EMS runs, their call volume would drop by 70-80%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Code20Photog
Spend some time in Los Angeles. I've seen and personally been a part of sandbagging on runs, not clearing on the radio from the hospital when a calls goes out, and even some things that may be borderline illegal, just to get another department to handle a EMS call.
Guys hate most EMS runs, plain and simple. Of course there are exceptions, but the majority of FDs I've spent thousands of hours with, as a private EMS EMT, Paramedic trainee, and now as a member of the media, don't set any land speed records on most EMS calls.
I understand pride, and I've seen some great firefighters that still have it. But I've seen exponentially more who are in the job for the paycheck, the boat, lifted 4x4 (with "bad boy" sticker) and the hot nurses.
A busy squad or RA in LA can run 20+ runs a day, some even more. Burnout is rampant, automatic aid, JPA agreement, whatever, isn't going to change that.
|
|

10-26-2012, 8:22 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulNDaOC
But seriously the most we will likely see will be some kind of CAD-to-CAD link between the two.
|
A CAD to CAD link and a couple of interoperable radio channels would be all that they would need.
|

12-20-2012, 7:17 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
 Database Admin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 793
|
|
Little update on this.
LACo Fire chief submitted a report that they have held meetings with LA City and Glendale(wonder if they mean Verdugo) to establish a countywide seamless 911 dispatch concept regardless of jurisdictional boundaries.
The fire chief states they have gained input from experts within the communications and dispatch fields along with input from other cities that utilize multi-agency dispatching.
One of the identified issues is aging computer systems used by both LACo and LA City. The County apparently is in the process of seeking a new dispatch platform already, while LA City is expected to begining seeking bids for its own replacement system next year. Both are “a very, very expensive propositions” however.
Story:
L.A.-area fire departments consider linking 911 dispatch systems - latimes.com
=
|

12-21-2012, 12:36 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Right here.
Posts: 410
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAflyer
LACo Fire chief submitted a report that they have held meetings with LA City and Glendale(wonder if they mean Verdugo)..
|
AFAIK, all the "Verdugo" (i.e. fire communications) dispatchers, supervisors and manager are employees of the City of Glendale, but any major decisions would of course involve the fire department administrators of the individual cities served by Verdugo.
Somewhat akin to LAPD, where almost all dispatch-related policies, rules, procedures, and even terminology are decided upstairs and handed down to Communications Division as orders.
But back to the topic at hand, it is good to see that some of the historically insular attitudes that still remain in the SoCal area are being addressed, hopefully once and for all. The fire service is still eons ahead of LE in most of those respects, unfortunately.
Last edited by Radio_Lady; 12-21-2012 at 1:03 AM..
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|