Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > Harris / MA/COM / GE / Ericsson Forum


Harris / MA/COM / GE / Ericsson Forum For general discussion of MA/COM EDACS and ProVoice systems, including equipment.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 03:07 PM
ecommfan's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver,Canada
Posts: 21
Default EDACS freq re use

Listening to a large multisite EDACS system in Vancouver Canada . The largest site is adding 6 new freqs . Two of these are being used by adjoining sites . Wondering what kind of seperation is required ? These 6 freqs are still in test mode . Has anyone seen freqs being re used in such close proximity on an EDACS system ? There also reports of simplex freqs being used in analog with tone protection . These same freqs are part of trunk sites . Wondering how likely this is ? Have not been able to confirm this . Have confirmed simplex use on freqs that are not part of the various trunk sets . Thanks for any help . The freqs are all in the database . The only change is Vancouver lcn 16 its 867.3625 .
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:16 PM
ecommfan's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver,Canada
Posts: 21
Default

LCN 15-20 now active with normal use on the Vancouver site
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2009, 08:37 PM
HarrisRF's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Posts: 36
Default

If the transmission doesnt contain HSD and LSD to handshake and to keep the channel up then the transmission will be ignored by the EDACS site. You might get a lot of carrier detect warnings.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2009, 09:49 AM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 96
Default

A lot will depend upon the terrain. In Vancouver, there are a lot of ridges that block RF, with the sites located in the valleys between the ridges. The problems would only occur at the tops of the ridges, and only if both channels were lit simultaneously, and it were a mobile doing the transmitting on the ridge top and a portable a long way from the receiving site on the other system.

Even if they are both control channels, assuming that color coding is turned on both sites will operate just fine, except that ProScan will have a very hard time.....

My guess is that Ecomm is planning to shut down the frequencies on the older site....they are just moving them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scott EDACS fmon Kentucky Radio Discussion Forum 25 08-23-2007 04:23 PM
Sticky Thread for MilAir TinEar Maryland Radio Discussion Forum 2734 11-10-2006 06:51 AM
Eastern /Ne part of Nevada Freq for NSRS (EDACS) clisp Nevada Radio Discussion Forum 4 01-21-2006 06:43 PM
Need help- Pro-95 Washoe EDACS Win95 file. nevadasky Nevada Radio Discussion Forum 1 02-25-2005 03:45 AM
North Florida FHP 800 Edacs Freq Anchor Florida Radio Discussion Forum 1 09-07-2004 09:23 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions