ICOM ICR-7000 receiver power transformer replacement

Status
Not open for further replies.

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
About 28 years ago I bought new an ICOM R-7000 receiver. A few years later when I upgraded my shack, I sold it to a freind of mine who has used it daily all these years.

Suddenly it is blowing the primary 1 amp fuse and with the bridge rectifier disconnected it still blows.

So with some certainty it appears the power transformer has failed.

Can anyone suggest :

1) a source for an OEM transformer ? Used or NOS?

2) the parameters of this transformer such as turns ratio, secondary voltage, VA etc so we can locate a suitable replacement.

The original appears to be a Core type arrangement and has multiple primary taps for regional voltage changes.

I am thinking a toroidial transformer might work, but am hesitant to recommend a selection without the electrical specs.

The service manual is not helpful beyond the part number.

I was going to suggest a new ICOM receiver, but this radio is repair worthy.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
Thanks! I have sent him a note.

From time to time I see these radios broken up and sold as parts on ebay. but none currently.
 

majoco

Stirrer
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
4,282
Location
New Zealand
Run it on a good linear external 13.8volt power supply. You could even remove all the power supply components. Gets rid of all those heat-generating bits.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
Run it on a good linear external 13.8volt power supply. You could even remove all the power supply components. Gets rid of all those heat-generating bits.
Yeah, I have an R-9000. It has a similar, but higher amp power supply. I have a fan fitted to the rear heatsink which helps a lot. I think it has same but larger, Core type transformer. Those apparently are less efficient. I will have to monitor the temp of that transformer. Mine has low operating hours and I re-capped the PS years ago proactively. My only failure was the VFO shaft encoder after a period I was using it a lot.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
Run it on a good linear external 13.8volt power supply. You could even remove all the power supply components. Gets rid of all those heat-generating bits.

Good advice! That was being recommended when they were first introduced by Icom new! They run very hot with Icom's internal power supply. You could almost cook a TV dinner on top of them!

I used to own both an IC-R7000, and the IC-R71. Both acquired a lot of problems as they aged.
 

majoco

Stirrer
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
4,282
Location
New Zealand
Alright, now that you have some other opinions, I just measured the current draw of my ancient R7000 from my homebrewed 13.8v well regulated power supply and it takes about 1.2Amps on the front panel meter. This means that you don't have to spend a fortune buying a huge PS to run it - unless of course you want to do what a lot of us do and that is run every nominally 12v device from the one power supply. So survey all the power supplies you can and deduce what is best for you. The only thing you have to check is that you can find the plug to fit the strange Icom socket - initially I made one by filing down an old hard drive connector and refitting the Molex pins into the required positions.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
Alright, now that you have some other opinions, I just measured the current draw of my ancient R7000 from my homebrewed 13.8v well regulated power supply and it takes about 1.2Amps on the front panel meter. This means that you don't have to spend a fortune buying a huge PS to run it - unless of course you want to do what a lot of us do and that is run every nominally 12v device from the one power supply. So survey all the power supplies you can and deduce what is best for you. The only thing you have to check is that you can find the plug to fit the strange Icom socket - initially I made one by filing down an old hard drive connector and refitting the Molex pins into the required positions.

Thanks for the information on the current draw. If this weren't a receiver I would suggest installing a small switcher PS inside of it. My freind wants to fix the AC supply, it provides portability if you take it somewhere on a whim.

Now looking at ways to restore the unit and reduce the heat. These have a Core type transformer in them. I thought it was a toroidial but it isn't. I have no idea why they chose that type of transformer. The R9000 has same type. From what I read they are less efficient and that equals more heat. A toroidial might be a better choice if the inrush current isn't a problem
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,033
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
If a transformer is less efficient, the magnetism is saturated and convert much of the energi to heat, it also will swallows spikes from the power line very efficient. It is a way to protect the semiconductors in the power supply but the heat will also dry out the capacitors and age them prematurely.

/Ubbe
 

majoco

Stirrer
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
4,282
Location
New Zealand
I haven't done any investigation around the power supply but it does seem a rather over-complicated circuit for just a couple of amps. Somebody said that a lot of heat comes from the bridge rectifier but I did notice that the series pass transistor has a very poor heatsink arrangement - both mounted close together on the back panel. I'm not overly sure about the function of that 56ohms across the regulator either - perhaps it may reduce the dissipation of the series pass transistor but the heat developed in total will be the same. In theory according to the schematic there should only be about 4watts generated from the regulator but it feels a darn sight more than that.
Just to be stupid (!) has any of you guys in the US tried setting the transformer taps for 200volts then trimming the voltage set potentiometer for 13.8v volts or an near as you can? It might not be physically possible with the voltage selector plugs - I'll investigate....
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
I haven't done any investigation around the power supply but it does seem a rather over-complicated circuit for just a couple of amps. Somebody said that a lot of heat comes from the bridge rectifier but I did notice that the series pass transistor has a very poor heatsink arrangement - both mounted close together on the back panel. I'm not overly sure about the function of that 56ohms across the regulator either - perhaps it may reduce the dissipation of the series pass transistor but the heat developed in total will be the same. In theory according to the schematic there should only be about 4watts generated from the regulator but it feels a darn sight more than that.
Just to be stupid (!) has any of you guys in the US tried setting the transformer taps for 200volts then trimming the voltage set potentiometer for 13.8v volts or an near as you can? It might not be physically possible with the voltage selector plugs - I'll investigate....
A simple, no mod voltage reduction could consist of an outlet box with a cord, inside a center tapped filament transformer with its secondary tapped to buck 3 or 6 volts from the line voltage. Being that most US service is close to 120V and not the designed 117 VAC, you could feed the radio its nominal 117V or even 114 V and reduce the power and heat somewhat.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,333
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I believe a toroidal transformer will be larger than a more conventional laminated core transformer of the same wattage rating and the toroidal will have worse voltage regulation. The only real benefit a toroidal has is low EMI.

What I would do in the same situation is power the receiver from a variable power supply connected to the bridge rectifier in the 7000 and find what input voltage to the regulator is needed for it to finally regulate at its rated output voltage. Then calculate what AC secondary voltage would be needed with the stock capacitor input power supply to provide maybe 2 or 3 volts more than that.

The end result should be a much cooler running power supply as I suspect the original had far too high of an input voltage to the regulator creating lots of extra heat in the pass transistor. It should be easy to find a suitable transformer on Epay that fits the space, has slightly higher wattage rating and maybe the same mounting arrangement.

It would be nice if someone with a working R-7000 could measure the voltage at the large filter cap in the power supply and also measure the regulated voltage powering the radio as a baseline for a repair like this.
prcguy



Thanks for the information on the current draw. If this weren't a receiver I would suggest installing a small switcher PS inside of it. My freind wants to fix the AC supply, it provides portability if you take it somewhere on a whim.

Now looking at ways to restore the unit and reduce the heat. These have a Core type transformer in them. I thought it was a toroidial but it isn't. I have no idea why they chose that type of transformer. The R9000 has same type. From what I read they are less efficient and that equals more heat. A toroidial might be a better choice if the inrush current isn't a problem
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
I believe a toroidal transformer will be larger than a more conventional laminated core transformer of the same wattage rating and the toroidal will have worse voltage regulation. The only real benefit a toroidal has is low EMI.

What I would do in the same situation is power the receiver from a variable power supply connected to the bridge rectifier in the 7000 and find what input voltage to the regulator is needed for it to finally regulate at its rated output voltage. Then calculate what AC secondary voltage would be needed with the stock capacitor input power supply to provide maybe 2 or 3 volts more than that.

The end result should be a much cooler running power supply as I suspect the original had far too high of an input voltage to the regulator creating lots of extra heat in the pass transistor. It should be easy to find a suitable transformer on Epay that fits the space, has slightly higher wattage rating and maybe the same mounting arrangement.

It would be nice if someone with a working R-7000 could measure the voltage at the large filter cap in the power supply and also measure the regulated voltage powering the radio as a baseline for a repair like this.
prcguy
Those are good suggestions. Especially the variable voltage experiment.

The existing transformer is an odd "core type" that at first glance looks like a toroid, but is not, it is an oval core (picture Indy 500 race track) with split primaries and secondaries wound around the long portions. It is not an EI type lamination like the R71 receiver has. I am at a loss why they chose that style, what performance advantage it would have. My R9000 has same type, but much larger.

The R7000 schematic says 15V at the secondary which I assume is RMS and about 17.X volts DC at the first filter cap.

Manuals for the R71 and R9000 peg the transformer at 14.5 and 16.5 V respectively for a similar topology.

My friend is still troubleshooting. I have him double checking the 117V wiring, the bypass caps and switch to make sure no fault on the primary side. He has measured 350 milli ohms on the secondary. But I am not sure that reflects a short. All we know at this point is that switching it on blows a fuse. There has been no smoke, no smell, no sparks, no toasty parts. I am hoping it's the switch, but those are rare as well.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,333
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
It sounds like its a toroidal type and with a layered sheet metal toroid core it would have good primary to secondary isolation for RF-EMI rejection, etc. If it were mine I would not hesitate to replace the transformer and regulator with a low voltage drop 3 terminal regulator IC.
prcguy

Those are good suggestions. Especially the variable voltage experiment.

The existing transformer is an odd "core type" that at first glance looks like a toroid, but is not, it is an oval core (picture Indy 500 race track) with split primaries and secondaries wound around the long portions. It is not an EI type lamination like the R71 receiver has. I am at a loss why they chose that style, what performance advantage it would have. My R9000 has same type, but much larger.

The R7000 schematic says 15V at the secondary which I assume is RMS and about 17.X volts DC at the first filter cap.

Manuals for the R71 and R9000 peg the transformer at 14.5 and 16.5 V respectively for a similar topology.

My friend is still troubleshooting. I have him double checking the 117V wiring, the bypass caps and switch to make sure no fault on the primary side. He has measured 350 milli ohms on the secondary. But I am not sure that reflects a short. All we know at this point is that switching it on blows a fuse. There has been no smoke, no smell, no sparks, no toasty parts. I am hoping it's the switch, but those are rare as well.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
It sounds like its a toroidal type and with a layered sheet metal toroid core it would have good primary to secondary isolation for RF-EMI rejection, etc. If it were mine I would not hesitate to replace the transformer and regulator with a low voltage drop 3 terminal regulator IC.
prcguy
Would you replace the transformer with a ferrite toroidial?

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
I don't see a reason why unless there are very low level audio stages nearby that would be subject to induced hum from transformer fields.
prcguy


The proximity to low level stages is a good question. There is a lot going on in that chassis. Which is why I wonder why they use that oval Core style transformer rather than a traditional E I laminated core.
 

cmdrwill

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
3,984
Location
So Cali
The proximity to low level stages is a good question. There is a lot going on in that chassis. Which is why I wonder why they use that oval Core style transformer rather than a traditional E I laminated core.

Probably due to much less magnetic field from the transformer. We used that type of transformer in test equipment.

I would set the receiver up for external 12 volt input. And use a remote power supply. All tho I have not seen the ICOM ICR-7000 receiver schematic.
 

ratboy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
970
Location
Toledo,Ohio
I think the PS in a R7000 is the same as the one in the R71a, but I haven't looked at a r7000's insides for a long time.. They pop up on Ebay once in a while, and saved my really nice "fix or repair" 71a that came with a failing supply. For some reason, it would not fire up on 12v before I replaced the supply with the Ebay one.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,868
My friend has a Hammond toroidial transformer with 15V secondary on order. Hopefully this will drop in and work properly. Not an inexpensive part.

The R71 has a laminated transformer with slightly lower voltage and If I recall the VA rating is lower. A lot more going on in an R7000 logic wise.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top