Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Idaho Radio Discussion Forum


Idaho Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Idaho.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2007, 02:51 AM
firemedic7526's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NW USA
Posts: 41
Default Digital Intelligibility Failure Boise Fire

The City of Boise Fire Department has reportedly stopped any transition to 700Mhz after a several million dollar investment by Ada County & the city.

Due to intelligibility issues during pass alarm activation and low air warning (scba) the fire department has said that a significant safety issue exists for their employees using "digital" technology over "analog."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2007, 01:33 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 45
Default

Can you describe the 'pass alarm activation' and 'low air warning (scba)' in detail?
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2007, 02:08 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,266
Default

They're both very loud and very annoying alarms. The problem is that when they are going off, it drowns out the FF's voice. On analog, at least you can understand what the FF is saying over the noise. However, on digital for whatever reason, it all but eliminates their voice and it's very difficult if not impossible to understand what they are saying.

Thus proving the point again that digital has no place in this particular application. I'm not anti-digital, infact I love the technology and wish everyone were using it...but the fact of the matter is, digital has no place on the fireground.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2007, 02:10 PM
firemedic7526's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NW USA
Posts: 41
Default

It has to do with intelligibility on the receiving end. If a firefighter is attempting to communicate while their low air alarm is activated or there is a pass alarm activated (firefighter down) the person/s on the receiving end will not be able to undrstand the message. The "digital" processing of voice and competing noise (pass alarm, low air alarm, etc.) is apparently the issue. The "vocoder" is unable to process (separate) voice vs noise and thus produces garbage as output.

This apparently occures during simplex or duplex operation.

Scary is that fire departments keep purchasing this technology! It will only be a matter of time before an "event" and the fire service will say wtf! How did this happen? We should have been warned!

Boise is not the only agency. Littleton CO., Plainfield IN., Phoenix AZ.. Many more. Some 700 some 800.

Last edited by firemedic7526; 11-11-2007 at 02:20 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2007, 11:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Libby, Montana
Posts: 149
Default

Question: Why couldn't they use a low-pass filter somwhere in the comm chain to get rid of the noise ? One that would allow voice to get through but get rid of the alarms. Depending on the frequency of the alarms.
__________________
cjrjr507
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2007, 01:00 AM
stateboy's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjrjr507
Question: Why couldn't they use a low-pass filter somwhere in the comm chain to get rid of the noise ? One that would allow voice to get through but get rid of the alarms. Depending on the frequency of the alarms.
That is all but impossible in this instance. The FF keys up his XTS5000 on a digital fireground channel and tries to talk while either or both alarms are going off in the immediate background. The radio turns all of this "noise" into digital garbage. It's a function of the digital vocoder in the P25 radio, so how are you going to filter the noise? Write special firmware for the vocoder?

Digital radios should not be used in critical fireground applications. Dispatch? Sure, but not for interior crews.
__________________
South Dakota: The most scanner-phobic gestapo state in the union
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2007, 01:29 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Libby, Montana
Posts: 149
Default

Oh yeah, that's right. duh! lol
__________________
cjrjr507
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
York County now LIVE on "800" rmquinn3419 South Carolina Radio Discussion Forum 178 08-02-2009 08:16 PM
SO MKE FD's ctadam12 Wisconsin Radio Discussion Forum 6 01-29-2007 09:22 PM
Official Uniden BC246T Scanner Thread blantonl Uniden Scanners 1140 09-28-2005 08:01 PM
Penobscot County tazman3851 Maine Radio Discussion Forum 1 08-12-2005 09:08 PM
NEB. State Wide-Communications got the green light need2speed Nebraska Radio Discussion Forum 1 06-14-2004 11:59 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions