• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Manufacturing Circuit Boards

Status
Not open for further replies.

N4GIX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
2,124
Location
Hot Springs, AR
I've been out of the loop as far as the most modern manufacturing is concerned, so I'd never seen one of the new-fangled "SMT" (surface mount technology) machines before.

It's fascinating! I remember well one of my first post-Army jobs was with ITT Mackay-Marine division testing boards that'd been hand assembled. Much of my work involved fixing things the "wave table soldering" had screwed up... :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RevHeQLCRhc
 

ElroyJetson

I AM NOT YOUR TECH SUPPPORT.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
3,698
Location
DO NOT ASK ME FOR HELP PROGRAMMING YOUR RADIO. NO.
It is pretty neat to see robotic machines moving almost too fast to see what they're doing, picking up and accurately placing components that require a human to use tweezers, and end up dropping half of them anyway.

To me the fascinating part is not so much the work they're doing, but the engineering thought processes that went into designing these machines.
 

N4GIX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
2,124
Location
Hot Springs, AR
I watched several videos of SMT machines at work. Most of them use pre-loaded strips containing several dozen parts (surface mount resistors, caps, etc.). The fingers pick up a strip from the bin in front and load them into their magazine. The fingers can then place batches of parts where needed and solder them in place without having to go back to the bin and reload.

I can only imagine the complexity of the programming involved, like yourself the engineering involved.
 

Gunnar_Guy

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
44
Location
West of the Rockies
I watched several videos of SMT machines at work. Most of them use pre-loaded strips containing several dozen parts (surface mount resistors, caps, etc.). The fingers pick up a strip from the bin in front and load them into their magazine. The fingers can then place batches of parts where needed and solder them in place without having to go back to the bin and reload.

I can only imagine the complexity of the programming involved, like yourself the engineering involved.
If you're familiar with the type of pick-and-place that used fingers you'll be astounded by the current state of technology that uses a tiny vacuum (it looks almost like a medical needle at the end) to hold the part. Fingers are simply much too clumsy for the very small chip-scale packages and 0201 and 01005 sized passives.

Small_Parts_Image1.jpg


I work at a PCBA fabricator (I'm in engineering rather than on the production side however), matter of fact. Our standard sized passive is 0402 (4 mil x 2 mil) and our machines are capable of high reliability with 0201 (2 mil x 1 mil). Our smallest IC capability is a flip chip with 0.50 mm pitch. Flip chip means the part is so small that there's no point to even putting it a plastic case, so the silicon die itself is literally built flipped with a metallized layer on top of the IC with terminals directly into the circuit. They then put "bumps" on the terminals, which are small balls of solder.

For example, this is a Freescale 32-bit 48MHz ARM Cortex M0 built in a 2mm x 1.5 mm chip-scale, and it even has a 12-bit ADC, 2 KB of RAM and 32 KB of flash on it. It's a fully featured MPU.

105351_fig1.jpg
 
Last edited:

N4GIX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
2,124
Location
Hot Springs, AR
Fascinating, Dave! Thanks for the additional information.

Actually, I used "fingers" mostly in the generic sense. Looking at my linked video, it seems clear that this machine is in fact using vacuum needles rather than actual mechanical fingers.

Nonetheless, I find the entire process quite interesting to watch.

I only wish that I'd live long enough to see the implementation of nanobot technology. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top