|
|
|
|
| Iowa Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Iowa. |

09-15-2012, 8:32 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
VHF Marine Radios used by farmers
Unless there are some new narrow band agriculture radio service frequencies in the 156.000 MHz area I have been monitoring harvesting and farm ops on the VHF maritime band frequencies. They talk as if no one is listening using a bunch of profanity and personal chit chat in addition to working related conversations.
I recall seeing some really nice Marine radios mobiles and portable at the local Bass Pro Shop I guess folks are using these too like they do GMRS without a license too very common.
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-15-2012, 10:59 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Quincy, Mass
Posts: 4,769
|
|
Can you be more specific as the Freqs in use.
There are some VHF Marine channels allocated to Part 90 licenses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N7DJR
Unless there are some new narrow band agriculture radio service frequencies in the 156.000 MHz area I have been monitoring harvesting and farm ops on the VHF maritime band frequencies. They talk as if no one is listening using a bunch of profanity and personal chit chat in addition to working related conversations.
I recall seeing some really nice Marine radios mobiles and portable at the local Bass Pro Shop I guess folks are using these too like they do GMRS without a license too very common.
|
|

09-15-2012, 1:38 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
Ch-11 156.550, I was reading around on line and could not find anything with regards to Marine radio frequencies being doubled as part 90 business. If there is sharing going on what radios are available for this specific service/ It would be nice to have more VHF available than just MURS with more power too
Could someone post a link to these part 90 rules that state specifically you can use a VHF marine channel for land mobile use I would appreciate it
Dave
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-15-2012, 1:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 3,432
|
|
Some custom harvesters have been illegally using VHF marine radios for decades. It's nothing new.
__________________
Tom
|

09-15-2012, 3:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
Yeah after searching this subject I found other post similar to mine with the same results, there are no rules that allow land based non-maritime communications on the VHF Maritime Band in the US and hunters use there handhelds on land as well. Being from a big metro city I have never actually monitored this kind of use before, with all the folks scanning it wouldn't be long before getting caught. I have monitored FRS being used by look out in areas where illegal activity was taking place ie drug houses and drop houses in the Phoenix metro area and out on the real rural areas in the high country where growers use FRS for primary operations tending their hidden marijuana crops.
This has been fun scanning all these frequencies here just looking for anything then run it on the FCC web site see how far away some of these stations are and also finding so many unlisted and unlicensed users out here in rural Iowa.
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-16-2012, 5:56 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Quincy, Mass
Posts: 4,769
|
|
INTERNATIONAL VHF MARINE RADIO CHANNELS AND FREQEUENCIES
156.0750 is a very common Part 90 Local Government Allocation, also known as VHF Marine 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by N7DJR
Ch-11 156.550, I was reading around on line and could not find anything with regards to Marine radio frequencies being doubled as part 90 business. If there is sharing going on what radios are available for this specific service/ It would be nice to have more VHF available than just MURS with more power too
Could someone post a link to these part 90 rules that state specifically you can use a VHF marine channel for land mobile use I would appreciate it
Dave
|
|

09-16-2012, 6:10 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
This is a nice list, I found it surfing for more info too and still don't see anything about using these frequencies on land but I will keep searching for this "Part 90" thing you're talking about. I did email these guys and ask specifically about this subject I hope to hear back from them soon.
Transmission on frequencies or channels shown in blue are not allowed within U.S. territorial waters, but are allowed on the high seas and in most other countries
156.550 Maritime Ch-11 was not listed in the blue
More Later
Dave
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-16-2012, 6:46 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
This guy got lucky and was able talk his way out of $10,000 down to $1,000 I couldn't imagine paying $10K for talking on a maritime radio on land. Check out this link below.
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/...05-1597A1.html
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-16-2012, 6:47 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
Another interesting web site with some information on maritime radio use on land.
MARINE RADIO ON LAND
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-17-2012, 3:33 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Quincy, Mass
Posts: 4,769
|
|
Some Part 80 radios enable channels 3A, 61A, and 64A etc when configured for "USA mode" even though those channels are allocated exclusively for Public Safety [Part 90] use by the FCC. The frequencies 156.075, 156.150, and 156.225 MHz are used for communication by police fire and municipal departments in many areas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N7DJR
This is a nice list, I found it surfing for more info too and still don't see anything about using these frequencies on land but I will keep searching for this "Part 90" thing you're talking about. I did email these guys and ask specifically about this subject I hope to hear back from them soon.
Transmission on frequencies or channels shown in blue are not allowed within U.S. territorial waters, but are allowed on the high seas and in most other countries
156.550 Maritime Ch-11 was not listed in the blue
More Later
Dave
|
|

09-17-2012, 4:04 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Greene County New Yawk
Posts: 499
|
|
This line in that link posted makes me laugh.....theres at laeast half dozen of these in my parts...
"MURS stations are prohibited from operating as a repeater station or as a signal booster."
Last edited by Mtnrider; 09-17-2012 at 4:10 PM..
|

09-17-2012, 4:10 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
I have asked the FCC for clarification regarding the use of maritime radios on land for non-maritime communications and specifically asked about the frequency Ch-11 156.550 MHz the one I have been monitoring the profanity and vehicle mobile operation on.
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-17-2012, 4:15 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bloomington,Illinois
Posts: 5,505
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N7DJR
I have asked the FCC for clarification regarding the use of maritime radios on land for non-maritime communications and specifically asked about the frequency Ch-11 156.550 MHz the one I have been monitoring the profanity and vehicle mobile operation on.
|
It would be interesting to see what they tell you, but nope they're not supposed to be there.
I did a search just for giggles,
156.5500 Search Results[]=19&tone=&coid=1
73,
n9zas
__________________
"Whatever doesn't kill you...will make you stronger"!
|

09-17-2012, 5:17 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
It's worth $10K to them if they have a case and all they would have to do is send out local agents to spend a day or two and monitor this and start sending the notice of violation followed soon after by a notice of monetary forfeiture.
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-17-2012, 5:32 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Prairie City, Iowa
Posts: 115
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnrider
This line in that link posted makes me laugh.....theres at laeast half dozen of these in my parts...
"MURS stations are prohibited from operating as a repeater station or as a signal booster."
|
I have seen commercial radios being advertised for MURS with power options alot higher than the 1 or 2 watt limit for that service. Not with FRS I see the bubble packs for around $30 for a pair these are becoming more common than the old CB radio service and sound just like it in some metro areas. I have yet to see any enforcement of power limit violations just unauthorized use by business's for non-family commercial use (FRS) MURS seems to be the only service not being watched as much as the others. I guess folks like these guys talking on Maritime radios do not know about MURS and that fact you can operate on those frequencies with less of a chance of drawing unnecessary attention like they are on Maritime radio. Wal Mart and drive threw joints talk on these frequencies all day long using 5 watt commercial handhelds with a range as good as any other VHF radio.
__________________
Dave Bohmke N7DJR
Prairie City, IA
|

09-18-2012, 8:53 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brooklyn, Iowa
Posts: 94
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N7DJR
It's worth $10K to them if they have a case and all they would have to do is send out local agents to spend a day or two and monitor this and start sending the notice of violation followed soon after by a notice of monetary forfeiture.
|
You could try to educate the farmers rather than trying to play radio police.
|

09-19-2012, 12:45 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bloomington,Illinois
Posts: 5,505
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k0kjl
You could try to educate the farmers rather than trying to play radio police.
|
Good luck with that...
73,
n9zas
__________________
"Whatever doesn't kill you...will make you stronger"!
|

09-19-2012, 6:40 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brooklyn, Iowa
Posts: 94
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gewecke
Good luck with that...
73,
n9zas
|
Thanks, but I've actually helped some of the farmers in my area with issues like this. I've read your posts on other "Radio Police" topics, I know where you stand on the issue.
Last edited by k0kjl; 09-19-2012 at 6:46 AM..
|

09-19-2012, 6:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|

Amateur Radio
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lower Hudson Valley New York
Posts: 1,492
|
|
While it doesn't sound like this is the case, there are numerous variations of reuse for maritime channels on land, especially inland where there are no what the FCC calls large bodies of water. Our Public Correspondence channels in the NYC area are allowed to be used for land communications, including the splinters between them. Even the Virginia State Police are using Marine channels inland. All it takes is a petition to the FCC and meet their 3 prong rule.
|

09-19-2012, 8:20 AM
|
|
|
As a former owner of several Public Correspondence licenses, I'd like to know what the FCC's 3 prong rule is.
Thanks
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:47 AM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|