Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > LTR Trunking


LTR Trunking General discussion of LTR, LTR Multi-Net, and Passport Systems

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 03:29 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft. Collins, CO.
Posts: 472
Default Some LTR mapping observations

The Wiki and its content is excellent. But there are alternative ways to do mapping. This is puzzle-solving so creativity can be helpful. Here are some things I've learned.

Observations from using a Pro-97 in Colorado. Tedious, but doable.

0. LTR is business radio. Hence the traffic is predominantly during business hours. Trying to map a system during nights and weekends will be less effective.

1. Pro-97 TGID and home LCN reading is useful but is susceptible to noise. Readings taken from a long, strong transmission are valid. Other readings might not be. Noise can cause false TGID display. I've seen brief inaudible blits of LCN 26 or LCN 32 and other nonsense. Logging these TGIDs over many different transmissions will give the picture of what the valid LCN really is. (By logging I mean I'm using a spreadsheet and typing everything I hear so as to be able to correlate things later.)

2. The systems I am finding seem to have the idle strobe enabled. Suspecting this I did a very slow Tune-step search thru the band of interest logging all strobing signals. Band plans have standard channel spacing so stepping to the next valid frequency isn't too hard.
Tune (Funct-Tune - up/down arrow) will find the channel. Using the programmed Search function won't (it seems to be deaf and we're trying to confirm presence of a periodic short burst). Sit on the channel for 5 minutes or so to catch any slow-rate strobes.
Log the frequencies where strobes are found. If possible, listen awhile and log TGIDs and most revealing of all - the CWID (that's the morse code station identifier) if it is sent. The systems I've seen have the CWID on its own TGID which for the Pro-97 reveals the LCN of the channel by its home channel number as well as the LCN reading in the Pro-97's field.

3. With CWID you can look up the FCC license info for the system. (Or not. I found one channel identifying itself with an invalid, not on record, callsign. Confirmed the ID several times. No record. ) Using the FRN license info, you can then get additional frequencies that might be part of the system. Listen to them to detect activity and LCNs you might have missed the first time thru.

3.5 Without CWID you can use the FCC lookup by frequency to get some candidate companies and their alleged transmitter locations.

4. With the spreadsheet you have a frequency, maybe some TGIDs and words, and a possible owner name for the system and an LCN for that channel.

5. After collecting the freq and probable LCN and owner you can sort the spreadsheet by owner and then by LCN to create a trial map of the system.

6. Then test the trial map by listening on each channel (manual) for awhile logging TGIDs. You should expect to see TGIDs that are homed on that channel. What you are really looking for are the other TGIDs that pop up there due to their home channel being busy. These TGIDs will tell you that there are other LCNs in the system. For example, I have a trial map showing LCN 01, 17 and 18 for a system. If TGID 0-04-004 pops up on channel 01 this tells me that I am missing a frequency that belongs to channel 04.

7. In some cases, there may be frequencies that fit into the LCN map but aren't actually part of the system. It is possible to have a single-channel system that IDs itself as having a certain LCN. It seems to me that the only way to sort this out is to listen to that channel and watch for other non-homed TGIDs showing that this channel is indeed part of a system. (It could take awhile to reach a conclusion)

8. Not all channels of a system will have the same callsign. But they will probably have the same owner.

9. Not all freqencies listed on a license are on the same system. Not all frequencies listed are in use. Sometimes frequencies list to different owners and the active/expired info isn't sufficient to resolve the ambiguity.

10. TGID number is not sufficient to prove that it is the same user on the same system. Chances are pretty good, for instance, that every system has a 0-01-001 TGID. You have to listen to the users and perhaps learn voices, names and background noise or signal characteristics (ping-on-transmit, digital data racket, hum, etc) to be sure it's the same users showing up on the different channels.

11. It's likely that certain "styles" help you sort a system. For instance, CWID being on 0x-255 on each channel vs 0x-253. Or that the even LCNs are used but the odd ones aren't.

12. Figuring out who has what TGID is straightforward enough to a certain level. For instance recognizing a car towing service is simple. Identifying WHICH company it is could be impossible just by listening. It might take field work so as to be at a location that's aired in order to put eyes on the radio user to get the company name.

13. Foreign language skills might be required. Many truck drivers hereabouts only speak Spanish. I can track a little of this. One TGID on a particular system has been entirely in Russian. I can recognise their voices and pickup a name here and there but I can't tell what business they are in. (taxi most likely?)


That's all for now. I hope this proves helpful to someone else.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 03:31 AM
DanHenry's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 137
Default Try zeromatic OFF on PRO-97 for idle burst searching

Quote:
Originally Posted by NW0U
2. The systems I am finding seem to have the idle strobe enabled. Suspecting this I did a very slow Tune-step search thru the band of interest logging all strobing signals. Band plans have standard channel spacing so stepping to the next valid frequency isn't too hard.
Tune (Funct-Tune - up/down arrow) will find the channel. Using the programmed Search function won't (it seems to be deaf and we're trying to confirm presence of a periodic short burst)...
NW0U,

I also use a PRO-97 when tinkering with LTR systems. Have you tried turning off the zeromatic feature when searching for LTR idle bursts? Here's a short thread that describes how to use zeromatic and how using it delays the squelch opening.

http://www.radioreference.com/forums...ad.php?t=68671

"Just be aware that having ZM on creates a 1-2 second delay before the squelch opens. You'll see the search stop on the "incorrect" freq, pause for 1 to 2 seconds, and then step up to the correct freq. Only then does the squelch open. The only time I keep ZM off is if I'm searching for unknown LTR freqs. The short LTR "data bursts" can be totally missed using ZM."

-Dan
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 02:56 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft. Collins, CO.
Posts: 472
Default Zeromatic

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHenry
NW0U,

I also use a PRO-97 when tinkering with LTR systems. Have you tried turning off the zeromatic feature when searching for LTR idle bursts? Here's a short thread that describes how to use zeromatic and how using it delays the squelch opening.

http://www.radioreference.com/forums...ad.php?t=68671

"Just be aware that having ZM on creates a 1-2 second delay before the squelch opens. You'll see the search stop on the "incorrect" freq, pause for 1 to 2 seconds, and then step up to the correct freq. Only then does the squelch open. The only time I keep ZM off is if I'm searching for unknown LTR freqs. The short LTR "data bursts" can be totally missed using ZM."

-Dan
Good info. I was unaware of any effects that ZM might have. It still seems to me that having a high-speed sweep thru the band is more likely than not to miss the strobe.
Once I figured out the band plan I could even type the expected frequencies into the spreadsheet before I stepped to them.

When using sweep with ZM off, how do you know when you've covered the band? (i.e. how do you know you can stop searching?)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2008, 06:09 PM
DanHenry's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NW0U
When using sweep with ZM off, how do you know when you've covered the band? (i.e. how do you know you can stop searching?)
There's no exact answer to that one. A quick test here doing a program search from 856.0 - 856.1 with zeromatic off would conistently pick up every idle burst. When you increase the search range to a few hundred Khz you start to miss a few so I would let it run for a couple of minutes.

-Dan
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 11:29 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 123
Default

NWOU, pm sent based on my observations .
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 12:06 AM
Airdorn's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC_Scan
NWOU, pm sent based on my observations .
Hey, could you share those observations with us all? I'm just now getting into piecing-together a couple of very chaotic LTR systems around here and need all the info I can get.

I've resorted to loitering around job sites and vehicles of 'suspect' companies, hoping to snag a juicy freq. or three with this little Radio Shack PRO-84 and its SignalStalker function.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 09:58 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft. Collins, CO.
Posts: 472
Default Tips

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airdorn
Hey, could you share those observations with us all? I'm just now getting into piecing-together a couple of very chaotic LTR systems around here and need all the info I can get.

I've resorted to loitering around job sites and vehicles of 'suspect' companies, hoping to snag a juicy freq. or three with this little Radio Shack PRO-84 and its SignalStalker function.
I asked BCscan the same thing but he hasn't chosen to post.

Since LTR systems are input/output repeater based, hanging around jobsites might not get what you want unless you can figure out the offsets between input and outputs. of course at the jobsite you can get the company name as opposed to the generic "concrete truck" that I can submit.

Since I started this particular thread I've submitted 2 simple systems and one complex one. The complex systems here seem to have at least 3 different licenses involved though the same company owns them all.
My best hint has been to wait patiently to hear the morse code (cw) identifier and then look up the licensee and then see what else they own in the same frequency range.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yet another LTR mapping system post NW0U LTR Trunking 7 03-07-2008 09:44 AM
Mapping LTR System SKiPDoG California Radio Discussion Forum 5 12-13-2007 12:13 AM
PSR-500 LTR Mapping feature... b52hbuff GRE Scanners 21 10-25-2007 01:19 PM
Pro-97 / LTR Mapping... b52hbuff Radio Shack Scanners 1 01-31-2007 11:44 PM
Mapping LTR systems in Tucson Astrak Arizona Radio Discussion Forum 3 06-04-2006 10:08 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions