RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Massachusetts Radio Discussion Forum


Massachusetts Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Massachusetts.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2013, 10:47 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Bedford,Ma
Posts: 609
Default New England regionwide interop network

I thought I saw a thread back in 2011 about a proposed region wide interoperable radio network? Has there been any updates? Or did the whole project go south?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2013, 10:57 AM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2011
Location: York county
Posts: 504
Default

I heard thers a vfh freq for interops in the York-Strafford-Rockingham counties.Thats Maine an N.H..Mass? I been wonderring abot a 3 region net, between Me, thru N.H to Boston out to Manchester N.H, back to Portland Me. The only entity that does that now is--emergency management.Thats still a small area. They should make a system, it would save alot of phone time when calling state to state.

Last edited by mainetrunk; 01-12-2013 at 11:04 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2013, 12:46 PM
cg cg is offline
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,647
Default

If it happens, it will be years away.

With all that money that was spread around since 9/11, if it isn't done by now, it will be difficult to make it happen in a poor economy.

chris
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2013, 2:14 PM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Bedford,Ma
Posts: 609
Default

Doesn't everyone have to leave 470-512 in about 10 years or so? Wouldn't it be wise to invest in a regional network? Or at least a statewide system such as Rhode island for instance???
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2013, 4:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2011
Location: York county
Posts: 504
Default

Every state has its dilema. You seen the Maine radio plan? Wow, what a cluster. Imagine Rhode Island to Bangor Me. Long story short-when I began scanning-2006 ish, Most of the towns around me were simplex-except for Berwick,Me--Portsmouth N.H, York....Well, I watched all systems grow these past years. South Berwick is 1 of the last entities to go from scratch, up to repeater (able?).. When it took off-it had 5,001 problems. months later, it seems to be ok,except for 1 or 2 radios.. And constant walkovers durring emergencies-what an analog squeal
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2013, 12:28 AM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Forums Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 6,191
Default

There was a proposed "New England Wireless Interoperability Network" that was drawn up 3-4 years ago by Motorola. The idea was to have all of New England on one interoperabilty trunking radio system, but Maine and Vermont went with Harris Radio, Inc. So the plans for this network now mostly involve Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. However, it really needs a funding mechanism to make it a reality.

73's

Ron
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2013, 4:47 AM
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Bedford,Ma
Posts: 609
Default

If this system were to take shape (which I doubut) would we be able to hear all cities and towns that do decide to join? Or does that depend on how the system parameters are setup? For instance if I was in Boston would I be able to hear Worcester or Springfield?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2013, 6:12 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KB1UAM View Post
If this system were to take shape (which I doubut) would we be able to hear all cities and towns that do decide to join? Or does that depend on how the system parameters are setup? For instance if I was in Boston would I be able to hear Worcester or Springfield?

The problem with anything designed by Motorola is that they have a huge ego that just can't seem to be satisfied with huge sums of money. If they are doing the design, it will never come to be with most public safety agencies today.

The best that can be had with what is available today is to use the standard "National Interoperability Radio Channels" and live with it. There is no need to be able to talk from the tip of Maine all the way down to the bottom of RI. of CT. If someone thinks that is needed, please explain why you think it is.

Most emergency communications in just about all the incidents I have seen only require a distance of a few miles at most. If you follow normal procedures, you don't want the grunt out in the field talking directly with some state EOC. You want that person talking with the local operations center. That center will then consolidate the communications needs back to the state EOC. The state EOC will do the same and go to the next higher command center.

To be able to allow a field person to have direct access to the master operations center will just bog down the functionality and traffic flow. Like as some people put it, information overflow. Probably 98 percent of the local communications during any incident is of a local nature. That person out in the field might not even have the full picture of what is going on. The local command point will have a much better view of what may be relayed to the next higher command point.

I know that you like to listen to the radio and be able to hear all that goes on. However, there is no reason to bog down a state wide radio network with every single transmission made right from the incident. Don't think there is a radio system built today that could handle that kind of radio traffic and still have it function normally. There is just not enough capacity built into a normal design.

A good example of this was the bridge collapse that took place several years back. Everyone in the state there was trying to listen to the traffic by getting on the common talkgroup that was being used on scene. This brought the trunking system to a halt as the system tried to pass the traffic all around the state. The state radio manager had to cut the links and only allow the local traffic to be carried and shut off the ability to be able to hear it any place else around the state.

There are limits as to just how much traffic any trunking system can carry. Used in a normal manor, most trunking systems function well. Try to have too many users scattered all over the state on a common talkgroup and the system will come down to it's knees.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2013, 4:42 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2011
Location: York county
Posts: 504
Default

You got a point Jim. From top of Maine to Ct, would be a little extreme. However, I personally think that there should be some sort of alert system. I am refferring to the coastal parts of Me.N.H/Mass, At the fore most east of these states, you got Maine that is analog-N.H has a 15ish mile stretch from Maine to Mass. N.H state police is p25-Mass, 800 mhz trunk. Any crazed fool would/has mad a mad dash to state lines-a system from York Maine to Amesbury would be sufficeient. You have to admit; crime is not getting any easier to conrol on roads. With all 3 states being so close, and 95 being easy to get to, They should do something. My opinion.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2013, 8:06 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,042
Default

They did. It's called the telephone. And the computer, which can send email. They used to use teletypes, but I think that's passe. There is a certain risk:benefit ratio when you only have X amount of dollars to spend on public safety communications. Build a robust local system with a region wide component (ala BAPERN and the NH interop channels) or spend gobs of money on an expensive wide area trunk system that will rarely be used. Between UTAC, VTAC, and 8TAC there is certainly enough nationwide interop capability in the rare instances where units have to travel between states.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mainetrunk View Post
You got a point Jim. From top of Maine to Ct, would be a little extreme. However, I personally think that there should be some sort of alert system. I am refferring to the coastal parts of Me.N.H/Mass, At the fore most east of these states, you got Maine that is analog-N.H has a 15ish mile stretch from Maine to Mass. N.H state police is p25-Mass, 800 mhz trunk. Any crazed fool would/has mad a mad dash to state lines-a system from York Maine to Amesbury would be sufficeient. You have to admit; crime is not getting any easier to conrol on roads. With all 3 states being so close, and 95 being easy to get to, They should do something. My opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 6:59 AM
ecps92's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Quincy, Mass
Posts: 4,693
Default

Teletype - yup, still used for much of the inter/intra-state traffic.



Quote:
Originally Posted by garys View Post
They did. It's called the telephone. And the computer, which can send email. They used to use teletypes, but I think that's passe. There is a certain risk:benefit ratio when you only have X amount of dollars to spend on public safety communications. Build a robust local system with a region wide component (ala BAPERN and the NH interop channels) or spend gobs of money on an expensive wide area trunk system that will rarely be used. Between UTAC, VTAC, and 8TAC there is certainly enough nationwide interop capability in the rare instances where units have to travel between states.
__________________
Bill N1KUG
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://www.scanmaritime.com
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 5:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2011
Location: York county
Posts: 504
Default

""South Berwick is 1 of the last entities to go from scratch, up to repeater (able?).. When it took off-it had 5,001 problems. months later, it seems to be ok,except for 1 or 2 radios.. And constant walkovers durring emergencies-what an analog squeal""

I wish to rephrase that statement, slight exaduration. My appologies to anyone who thinks our new system is not as good as it gets. It is in the best local, perfect structure.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions