Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Michigan Radio Discussion Forum


Michigan Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Michigan.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2005, 04:12 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 33
Default Monroe County

Is Monroe County still dispatching on 154.43 & 460.175? I have not heard anything lately.......

Thanks,
john
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2005, 04:15 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

1) Y (that will be in effect forever likely because the pagers are not trunking capable)
2) N
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2005, 09:30 PM
Gary69's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Thy are using 800 MHz digital you need a digital scanner like the Radio Shack PRO-96 Digital
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2005, 06:38 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

They are still dispatching fire on analog 154.430MHz and will likely be dispatching there for a LONG time, so you don't need a digital scanner if all you are worried about is dispatch as he posted.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2005, 08:12 AM
johnvassel's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Near Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
They are still dispatching fire on analog 154.430MHz and will likely be dispatching there for a LONG time, so you don't need a digital scanner if all you are worried about is dispatch as he posted.
Kind of the nice thing about us rural fire folks. There's no way someones going to give 22 members of my dept trunking radios in order to get toned out, so dispatch will be analog for most of my volunteer career.
Even Ingham co. snatched grand ledges old frequency, they'll be toning out any county depts via that frequency.

john
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2005, 10:41 PM
rjschall's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 46
Default

Yes the simulcasting will be done on 154.430 but it will not be done forever. The only thing you will hear once everything is hooked up and everyone is totally up and running on the 800, is that on 154.43 all you;ll hear is the tones and what the call is. everything then will be switched over to the 800 system once the call goes out. you will not hear any other radio traffic come through once this is all set and done.

460.175 sheriffs dept. has been online the new system completely since last month
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2005, 12:15 PM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjschall
Yes the simulcasting will be done on 154.430 but it will not be done forever. The only thing you will hear once everything is hooked up and everyone is totally up and running on the 800, is that on 154.43 all you;ll hear is the tones and what the call is. everything then will be switched over to the 800 system once the call goes out. you will not hear any other radio traffic come through once this is all set and done.

460.175 sheriffs dept. has been online the new system completely since last month

Dont look for that to happen anytime soon. There are major problems with 154.430. As of right now they are using a tone of 118.8. There is also talks about something else dealing with the VHF freqency, but I cannot mention yet, but will as soon as it is ok. The VHF will be around forever. Monroe County will always use their Fire VHF frequency. Fire will not be totally dependent on the MPSCS as the Sheriff is. Stay tuned!

Eric
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2005, 01:51 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default Fire Simulcast Dropped

From what I heard a few days ago, the fire simulcast will be turned off this coming week and the only thing on VHF will be pager tones and dispatches.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2005, 03:26 PM
rjschall's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 46
Default

According to my sources, Monday 3/7 is the day for the switchover for Fire.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2005, 07:39 PM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

Yep that is correct. It has been listed on my website for the last couple of days. Monday is the deadline for the patch. I know a lot of firefighters are pretty irritated about it, but it should be ok.

Eric
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 11:37 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holland, Ohio
Posts: 233
Send a message via AIM to Tophtoh
Default

Well, I was in Monroe County last night and I have to say I am upset with the quality. I've heard other MCPCS systems and they sound fine. What diff. about Monroe's? The only place I could hear them good is about 2nd and S Monroe. Any feed back? Thanks
__________________
Got P25?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 11:44 AM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

Well a couple of things. 1)Monroe is the FIRST Simulcast MPSCS System to go online 2)Are you refering to Fire or Police sounding bad?

I am in Ypsilanti, and I have to monitor that system off of the Flat Rock Tower, as the dundee tower does not do well up here. I often listen to the data channel and can hear it just fine, but none of my scanners will decode it. I think it is a Simulcast issue. I think maybe it is designed to only do well in Monroe County, but not outside the county. On that same note, I hear Monroe Couty just fine off of the flatrock tower.

It is really funny how these towers operate, as I cannot even hear the Ann Arbor Tower and it is even in my county!!!(well off my new discone with "N" connectors I cannot hear it, but on my 3 element beam I can a bit)

Eric
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 11:45 AM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tophtoh
Well, I was in Monroe County last night and I have to say I am upset with the quality. I've heard other MCPCS systems and they sound fine. What diff. about Monroe's? The only place I could hear them good is about 2nd and S Monroe. Any feed back? Thanks
What kind of reception problems are you having? Are you receiving a lot of static or digital "bonking"? Also, what kind of antenna, coax, and radio are you using?

73's

Ron
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 11:50 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holland, Ohio
Posts: 233
Send a message via AIM to Tophtoh
Default

I'm using a PRO-96 with a rubber ducky 800 antenna. I'm assuming there's a repeater in the city right? Thier system sucks compared to Ohio MARCS. I can hear MARCS better from Monroe County then I can Monroe County in Monroe County! Have you heard any reports of how the officers and dispatchers or what not like it? I am having static mostly, some bonking in the middle of transmissions.
__________________
Got P25?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 11:55 AM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

There are Four Towers in Monroe County.....Berlin, Dunbar, Dundee, and Whiteford. There are no repeaters in Monroe at all for the 800 MHz MPSCS System(except for Icall and Itac channels)

With the 800 Rubber Duck, I would expect that you would hear some bonking etc....and if you are in Ohio, you definatly will because the system is not designed to be heard in Ohio!

Eric
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:02 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holland, Ohio
Posts: 233
Send a message via AIM to Tophtoh
Default

No, I was stating. I can hear MARCS when I am in Monroe better than I can hear Monroe's system when I am in Monroe.
__________________
Got P25?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:20 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

As mentioned in the other threads this has been posted on - none of the scanners currently out were developed for CQPSK systems. Hopefully the 396T will be better suited.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:40 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holland, Ohio
Posts: 233
Send a message via AIM to Tophtoh
Default

What does CQPSK mean? Is that 9600 baud?
__________________
Got P25?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 12:44 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

No, it's a type of APCO25 that is used for simulcast towers (like Monroe Co.) Originally the Pro96 did not support it at all, and the Bearcat line did (but barely.) The Pro96 was upgraded about a year ago and the Bearcat also got an update, but my guess is you can only do so much when none of the scanners had a system to test with during development.

I've held my Pro96 next to one of Monroe Co's handhelds and the Motorola did a notably better job.

- Rob
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2005, 02:11 PM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,993
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEMTTP
There are Four Towers in Monroe County.....Berlin, Dunbar, Dundee, and Whiteford. There are no repeaters in Monroe at all for the 800 MHz MPSCS System(except for Icall and Itac channels)
Eric
The Dunbar Road Tower is technically in Monroe:

http://tiger.census.gov/cgi-bin/mapg....pl?cs=WQBM334

73's

Ron
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions