Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Michigan Radio Discussion Forum


Michigan Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Michigan.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:41 AM
HobbyTalk's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southwest MI
Posts: 17
Default Cell interference forces police-radio upgrade

Kalamazoo, MI - Cell-phone interference is wreaking havoc with Kalamazoo's new police radios and has prompted the city to spend nearly a half-million dollars on tower upgrades.

Just four months after the Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety flipped the switch on a new, $1.8 million radio system, the City Commission on Monday reluctantly approved spending an additional $458,777 on tower equipment.

Portable radios that officers carry outside their cars are failing at alarming rates to get their signals through, with officers encountering numerous "dead spots," particularly inside buildings, Public Safety Chief Dan Weston told commissioners.

"On several occasions, officers have been in foot pursuit, and no one has been able to hear their radio traffic," the chief said in a memo. "At other times, officers have attempted to call out for help while wrestling with a dangerous offender, and we have not heard their attempts to communicate with our radio system."

The city in November activated the new, 800-megahertz digital radio system and signed onto the Michigan Public Safety Communications System, a network of Michigan State Police towers that allows different public-safety agencies to communicate with one another.

The portable Motorola radios were tested at more than 300 sites in Kalamazoo in December 2002 and produced what Weston said was "very acceptable" coverage.

But big problems became evident immediately after the new radios went into use last November. State and Motorola engineers attribute the difficulties to the rapid proliferation of cell-phone towers and usage, Weston said. Cell-phone signals, also on the 800 MHz band, sometimes drown out signals from the 3-watt, portable radios that officers use, he said.

The fix involves adding a signal repeater and other equipment to an existing KDPS tower at station No. 6 at Howard Street and Oakland Drive, as well as upgrading state towers near Plainwell and Vicksburg that serve Kalamazoo's radio system.

"Instead of us being overwhelmed by the cell phones, it is going to allow us to overwhelm the cell phones," Weston told commissioners.

The tower work is expected to take about three months to complete.

Weston said that once the towers are upgraded, Motorola will guarantee radio coverage from inside buildings through 95 percent of the city. "There is not 100 percent coverage with any radio system ... there will still be some dead spots, (but) it is going to greatly enhance our ability to communicate," he said.

The project will cost $555,744, with the local share reduced by state contributions of $96,967 in equipment and labor. Local funding will come primarily from federal grants.

City commissioners expressed frustration with the added expense but unanimously approved the contract-change order.

"We have to do this. We can't leave our people vulnerable," Commissioner Don Cooney said.

Other communities have had similar problems with 800 MHz radios. Ionia and Monroe are among other Michigan cities that have encountered serious difficulties with interference since going on the state radio system, Weston said.

The federal government is working on a plan to move cell-phone frequencies farther away from frequencies used by police, fire and other public-safety agencies, Weston said.

City Manager Pat DiGiovanni cautioned, though, that the tower upgrades aren't necessarily a last fix for radio interference. "We may need another tower someday," he said. "We can expect more and more interference within the airwaves."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2005, 11:32 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

Interesting excuse...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2005, 05:48 PM
OmensEdge's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 175
Send a message via AIM to OmensEdge
Default

This is definately great news. I live near the west side of Kalamazoo where several officers have encountered the dead spots. I also live in a high rise building and there are only two optimal locations in my home where I can monitor the digital transmissions. Even when I can pick up the reception, it's pretty sketchy and I have to have my attenuator locked on to all of my control channels to pick up anything. This also makes me believe that it is due to some sort of interference, and like Weston reported, possibly cell-signal related.

Whatever the case may be, I look forward to being able to hear all of the digital traffic in my area once the upgrades are finalized.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2005, 06:18 PM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,990
Default

Any idea as to how long it will take to implement the new tower, and upgrade the others?

73's

Ron
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2005, 01:06 AM
HobbyTalk's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southwest MI
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
The tower work is expected to take about three months to complete.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007, 03:24 AM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1
Default EDACS system in Texas

Irving Tx to be precise has problems and dead spots on handhelds BUT, if its cell phones I dont know, it seems like more of a hill or building ubstruction dead spot, the reason i say that is they got too many cell phones here and the dead spots would be more, mabye the terrain in Kalamazoo is upstructing the handhelds and thats why they are upgrading the antenna
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 09:50 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, MI-Barry County(Near G.R. & Ionia)
Posts: 686
Send a message via ICQ to Skud
Default

will be intersting as if I stand in certain places in my house I can get the plainwell tower and will love to see if after the upgrade if I get better reception.
__________________
PSR-500 | Pro-96 | BCD996T | PSR-600
Webmaster http://westmichiganscan.com
ID Tracker Website
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 10:23 AM
mikey60's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oakland County Michigan
Posts: 2,173
Default

You all realize this thread is over 2 years old, and the work has long since been completed right?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 01:02 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, MI-Barry County(Near G.R. & Ionia)
Posts: 686
Send a message via ICQ to Skud
Default

darn Back to standing in one spot
__________________
PSR-500 | Pro-96 | BCD996T | PSR-600
Webmaster http://westmichiganscan.com
ID Tracker Website
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007, 10:01 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,107
Default

Welcome to the wonderful world of 800 MHz!

GTO_04
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007, 10:55 AM
SLWilson's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via MSN to SLWilson Send a message via Yahoo to SLWilson
Default 800MHz...

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO_04
Welcome to the wonderful world of 800 MHz!
GTO_04
We live in the hills of Southern Ohio....800MHz sucks big time in hill country.

It seems like almost everyone in the whole country jumped to 800MHz equipment without understandiung the limitations. LINE OF SIGHT means just what it says.

Low band penetrated buildings, hills etc. Straight radio. No repeater...VHF Hi was a "little worse" at penetrating buildings, mobile homes and places officers had to go. Move to UHF and add a repeater to the mix, but, it was worse than VHF....

These agencies switching to higher and higher frequecies apparently just don't get it.

The higher in freq you go, the LOWER power they will allow you to operate at. The lower the power, the MORE towers you need to cover your area. The more $$$$ you have to spend to cover your area.

The state of Ohio went to a statewide trunked radio system. In our county, they had to install six towers to make it go. The sites are connect to a main computer (switching/relay) system in Columbus by T1 curcuits. (That up from their ONE tower they'd used on low band for similar coverage)

The 800MHz trunked system works great for them. But, they've got millions of dollars invested in the infrastructure AND a monthly fee they pay to Ma Bell for their T1 hookups to make it all go...As long as Ma Balkl doesn't fail, it will continue to be OK.

We are still operating with VHF Hi band equipment. Countywide. Until they buy us something new or run us off, this is most likely where we will stay.

Steve/KB8FAR
__________________
[B][COLOR="Navy"]I have my time in. Gonna stick around to see what happens next though !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions