Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Michigan Radio Discussion Forum


Michigan Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Michigan.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 10:47 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rose City Michigan
Posts: 5
Question What is with the Acronyms lately on my scanners?

Have you guy's been noticing this? What is with the acryonyms on my scanner lately my goodness it seems like all the sudden we have an acronym for everything on the face of the earth? Most of them i just laugh because they are simple to figure out.

Although they have had a couple of codes lately that have baffled me and i can't find them anywhere on the net???

They will say you have a PDA at such and such.

OR

Your driver matt kinslith has a Prior 904 and 625, his license is nill and null and valid until mar of 2010.


What the heck is a PDA? It's not a public display of affection? They make it sound like an accident, or as if they are looking for somebody?

What is a prior 904 or 625? It's obviously some kind of criminal record? Perhaps DUI? Who knows..? Driving without a license thats pretty common around here. Just curious.

Also i've heard alot of Bond stuff "Cash Assurity?" They sure are making sure they are getting their money man lol. That "Cash is ASSURED!"

LOL

Thanks in advance all

I've been listening to scanners for a long time and never heard of these acronym's sometimes they will use 3500 too and ones like that. That is drugs i know that much it's narcotics. An ex cop told me that but he didn't know about these two they where even new to him! Talk about mixing it up! What next?


AlPiNe~
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 10:50 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

PDA = Property Damage Accident (nobody hurt) vs PI (Personal Injury).

Many of the rest sound like standard MSP codes, have you looked at the code database here?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 10:54 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kimball, Michigan
Posts: 1,625
Default

Departments are starting to become NIMS compliant meaning scrapping 10 Codes.

PDA = Property Damage Accident, although they are now referred to as CRASHES in Michigan.

Cash Assurity means they can post a roadside bond with cash so they dont' have to go to jail right there on the spot.

625 Violations are 257.625 in the state statute
Operating motor vehicle while intoxicated; operating motor vehicle when visibly impaired; penalties for causing death or serious impairment of a body function; operation of motor vehicle by person less than 21 years of age; requirements; controlled substances; costs; enhanced sentence; guilty plea or nolo contendere; establishment of prior conviction; special verdict; public record; burden of proving religious service or ceremony; ignition interlock device; “prior conviction” defined; violations arising out of same transaction.


904's are license suspensions.
__________________
NEWT GINGRICH FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 11:05 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rose City Michigan
Posts: 5
Smile HUH.. SO i even figured out the difficult ones :) I'm proud

HUH so i even figured out the difficult ones I'm proud of myself. thankyou is there some kind of guide on here for future reference on these codes? Since they seem to be switching over like the gentlemen said. It would be nice to have a list avail to print off .


Thank you in advance "yet again."

Also thanks for explaining the cash assurity thing it was appriciated .

Ya thats the Statatory Law i thought they where quoting. I figured that's what they where doing is using Statory law instead of just code. Darn and all i have is a motorcarrier handbook lol, i wish i had the state handbook now .

AlPiNe~
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 12:50 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kimball, Michigan
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinestars_2002795 View Post
HUH so i even figured out the difficult ones I'm proud of myself. thankyou is there some kind of guide on here for future reference on these codes? Since they seem to be switching over like the gentlemen said. It would be nice to have a list avail to print off .


Thank you in advance "yet again."

Also thanks for explaining the cash assurity thing it was appriciated .

Ya thats the Statatory Law i thought they where quoting. I figured that's what they where doing is using Statory law instead of just code. Darn and all i have is a motorcarrier handbook lol, i wish i had the state handbook now .

AlPiNe~
Send me a email darrell.bigbluemsp@gmail.com I have a copy of the complaint file classification numbers someplace on my external hard drive at home I can email you.
__________________
NEWT GINGRICH FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:38 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 63
Default

Your driver matt kinslith has a Prior 904 and 625, his license is nill and null and valid until mar of 2010.


What the heck is a PDA?



This kind of traffic has been used for years.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 10:21 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Default

"Your driver matt kinslith has a Prior 904 and 625, his license is nill and null and valid until mar of 2010."

625 refers to the OWI "Operating While Impaired" (MCLA 257.625)
904 refers to DWLS "Driving while License Suspended (MCLA 257.904)

Both are used by officers because additional offenses can lead to confiscation of the vehicle license plate on an arrest.

"nil" refers to there being no record in LEIN Law Enforcement Information Network - generally that there is no warrant for the persons arrest. The phase that is returned from the system is "Nil LEIN file".
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2009, 11:15 PM
Ronaldski's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bay City MI
Posts: 109
Default

From:
Mid-Michigan scanner frequency list
A.I. Accident Investigator
A.L.S. Advanced Life Support (ALPHA)
A.C.F.A. Attempt to Commit Felonious Assault
A.D.W. Assault with a Deadly Weapon
A.R.M. Alternate Report Method
(No written report)
A.R.T.C.C. Air Route Traffic Control Center
A.T.I.S. Automatic Terminal Information
Service (Airports)
A.T.L. Attempt To Locate
A.W.O.S. Automated Weather Observation
System
B.C.J. Bay County Jail
B.L.S. Basic Life Support (BRAVO)
B.M.C. Bay Regional Medical Center
B.O.L. Be On the Lookout
C.C.W. Carrying Concealed Weapon
C.H.F. Congestive Heart Failure
C.L.N.C. Clearance (Airports)
C.M.I.S. Criminal Management Information
System
C.S.C. Criminal Sexual Conduct
D.W.I. Driving While Intoxicated
D.W.L.S. Driving While License Suspended
E.T.O.H. Alcohol
F.A.C. Failed to Appear in Court
F.C.J. Failure to Comply with Judgment
F.T.A. Failure To Appear (in court)
F.T.C. Failure To Comply
(with court judgment)
G.O.A. Gone On Arrival
H & R Hit & Run
H.E.A.R.N Hospital Emergency Administrative
Radio Network
HEELO Helicopter
HIWAS Hazardous In-flight Weather
Advisory Service
HOOK Tow truck
ILS Instrument Landing System
K Killed
KEYHOLDER Has keys to get into the place
L.E.I.N. Law Enforcement Information Network
L.Z. Landing Zone (helicopters)
M.E. Medical Examiner
M.I.P. Minors In Possession of alcohol or
Tobacco
M.D.O.P. Malicious Destruction Of Property
M.D.T. Mobile Data Terminal
M.S.O. Marine Safety Officer (Coast Guard)
N.C.I.C. National Crime Information Center
O.D. Officer of the Day (Coast Guard)
O.T.L. Out To Lunch
O.U.I.L. Operating Under the Influence of
Liquor (or O.U.)
P & L Prostitution & Loitering
PAT.COMM. PATrol COMMander (Coast Guard)
P.B.T. Portable Breathalyzer Test
P.D.A. Property Damage Accident
P.I. Personal Injury accident
P.I.W. Person(s) In Water
P.O.B. Persons On Board
P.P.O. Personal Protection Order
R.A. Robbery Armed
R.T.D. Return To Department – Lunch/Dinner
RIG Ambulance
RUNNER Someone who is responsible at the
place
RVR Runway Visual Range
S.A.R. Search And Rescue
S.O.R. Sex Offender Registration
S.O.S. Secretary Of State
T.X. Telephone call
TRACON Air Traffic Control
U.C. Under Cover
U.D.A.A. Unlawfully Driving Away an
Automobile
U.T.L. Unable To Locate
V.C.S.A. Violation of Chemical Substance Act
V.F.R. Visual Flight Rules (Airplanes)
V.O.R. VHF Omni-directional Radio-range
(Airplanes)
V.P.H.C. Violation of Public Health Code
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 01:03 AM
philkoz's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Baltimore, MI.
Posts: 137
Default

The correct wording is "Cash OR Surety", not Cash Assurity, and basically breaks down as follows:

Cash bonds:
Some people choose to simply pay cash for their bail.

Surety bail bonds:
Surety bail bonds involve a number of contracts with a bail agent that contains stipulations for release, such as drug treatment programs. Bonds of this type usually require some form of collateral for the bail amount.

Most warrants usually require 10% CASH OR SURETY of the total amount to get released, pending a court date. Some are CASH ONLY, depending on the charge. None of this obviously applies to Felony Warrants.
__________________
-Phil

"73's & Happy Monitoring !!"

Last edited by philkoz; 03-08-2009 at 01:07 AM.. Reason: add'tl info
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 01:11 AM
mancow's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,533
Default

Strange how things differ by region. Here the cash / surety thing means that bond can be posted in the form of cash or through the use of a bail bond agent.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2009, 06:25 PM
gg750's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 361
Send a message via AIM to gg750 Send a message via Yahoo to gg750
Default

The codes/acronyms you listed are certainly nothing new, they've been using in GT county for years. Did your area use plain english before? It's funny that their now changing to codes/acronyms when I thought PS agencies were supposed to starting using plain english instead of codes.

G
__________________
Pro-96
Pro-2096
BC785D
BCT15

Last edited by gg750; 03-19-2009 at 02:34 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2009, 08:14 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kimball, Michigan
Posts: 1,625
Default

They are supposed to go to plain speak and if you listen to the feds anyone that doesn't isn't NIMS compliant and won't receive funding in the future for communications.

Hasn't happend yet but thats where it's heading.
__________________
NEWT GINGRICH FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2009, 09:47 PM
n5ims's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 346
Default

Nix the tla xlats. The PO may c it n QRZ or go 10-6. They may even run code to go secure!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2009, 10:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbluemsp View Post
They are supposed to go to plain speak and if you listen to the feds anyone that doesn't isn't NIMS compliant and won't receive funding in the future for communications.
That's not true... They came out saying "no codes" a few years ago, but the outcry was too strong. NIMS requires that if you communicate during an event, you don't use codes. That's pretty easy to do, so no real change.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2009, 11:21 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

FEMA:

"The FY 2006 NIMS Implementation requirement to use plain language does not abolish the use of 10-codes in everyday department communications. Accordingly, the use of 10-codes in daily operations will not result in the loss of federal preparedness funds."

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/plain_lang.pdf

ICS:

Q: Our 911 center, which receives and dispatches emergency and nonemergency calls, has told us that we may not use 10-codes at all. I gather we must use plain language when using NIMS ICS. Is that correct?

A: Yes. When engaged in a multiagency/multijurisdictional incident using ICS, plain language is required. The value of using 10-codes for simplicity and speed is lost when members of the response team are unaware of their meanings, as may occur in a multiagency/multijurisdiction response event. As 10-codes used in one jurisdiction or agency are not the same as those used in another, it is important that responders and incident managers use common terminology to prevent misunderstanding in an emergency situation. While plain language is not required for internal operations, it is encouraged over 10-codes to promote familiarity within operational procedures used in emergencies.

http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/I...andSystem.shtm

Last edited by rdale; 03-19-2009 at 10:51 AM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2009, 08:32 AM
detroit780's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 287
Default What is the problem

While plain language is not required for internal operations, it is encouraged over 10-codes to promote familiarity within operational procedures used in emergencies.

Seems like they really want you to get used to plain language. The more you use it the less likely you are to slip into code during a multi agency event. So what's this argument all about anyway? Mor elike I'm right you're wrong to me, just like well you know....




Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale View Post
Guess you're a little behind the times again. I'm leaving meteorology as my primary career, I now work in emergency management. I didn't quote you so that you might have time to fix your error and not look... well... you know...

If, however, you still think you are correct and I am wrong, I would love to see your proof. I'll stand corrected if so.

FEMA:

"The FY 2006 NIMS Implementation requirement to use plain language does not abolish the use of 10-codes in everyday department communications. Accordingly, the use of 10-codes in daily operations will not result in the loss of federal preparedness funds."

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/plain_lang.pdf

ICS:

Q: Our 911 center, which receives and dispatches emergency and nonemergency calls, has told us that we may not use 10-codes at all. I gather we must use plain language when using NIMS ICS. Is that correct?

A: Yes. When engaged in a multiagency/multijurisdictional incident using ICS, plain language is required. The value of using 10-codes for simplicity and speed is lost when members of the response team are unaware of their meanings, as may occur in a multiagency/multijurisdiction response event. As 10-codes used in one jurisdiction or agency are not the same as those used in another, it is important that responders and incident managers use common terminology to prevent misunderstanding in an emergency situation. While plain language is not required for internal operations, it is encouraged over 10-codes to promote familiarity within operational procedures used in emergencies.

FEMA | Federal Emergency Management Agency

Seems pretty clear and obvious to me, so I'm curious what information you have that refutes it...
__________________
Les W8MSP

http://W8MSP.com
http://Michigan-Radio.com

E-Mail W8MSP@W8MSP.com
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2009, 10:51 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by detroit780 View Post
Seems like they really want you to get used to plain language. The more you use it the less likely you are to slip into code during a multi agency event
Absolutely agree... Doesn't seem there's much of an argument from anyone on the information though...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radioshack vs GRE vs Uniden vs other Scanners khoelldobler Radio Shack Scanners 15 08-03-2009 11:01 AM
SAFE-T and analog scanners W9RXR Indiana Radio Discussion Forum 3 12-03-2008 04:36 PM
New vs Older Scanners lars128 General Scanning Forum 4 10-07-2008 08:25 PM
FS: Two antennas for base scanners scansomd Old Classifieds Archives 0 09-06-2008 11:44 AM
800 MHz Rebanding Impact on Uniden Scanners UPMan Uniden Scanners 35 03-23-2005 09:41 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions