Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Michigan Radio Discussion Forum


Michigan Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Michigan.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:35 PM
MacombMonitor's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,939
Default Any new developments with Detroit's system?

Have there been any new developments with the problems associated with receiving Detroit's new digital system on a digital scanner? Has anyone been able to confirm what the problem actually is? Have any of the scanner manufactures responded with any possible solutions? Or is this a dead issue that we'll just have to live with?

Thanks!
__________________


MacombMonitor
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:53 PM
Alpha432's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Downriver Area, Michigan
Posts: 196
Unhappy

Still the same old choppy off and on reception with me. Even in the city.
__________________
Heres to us and those like us....DAMN FEW LEFT! HONOR GUARD. For those who have gone before their time.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:03 PM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

I talked with a tech that knows the system in and out. He said that there is nothing different regarding the "system" it is the same as the regular MPSCS

So with that, I dont know what to say other than it was well designed and is working wonderfully for the CITY OF DETROIT!

I sure do wish I could hear them I miss Detroit FIRE!!!!


Eric


BTW.....It is not a scanner issue at all, it is just the way the sub system was designed to work.
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2005, 10:50 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,313
Default

"He said that there is nothing different regarding the "system" it is the same as the regular MPSCS "

From their standpoint, that is true. However Detroit / Monroe / Genesee are the only simulcast systems on MPSCS. And the only ones scanners are having problems with.

"It is not a scanner issue at all, it is just the way the sub system was designed to work."

No, it really is a scanner issue. Other simulcast subsystems across the country, digital and/or analog, work fine.

- Rob
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 12:10 PM
n8chb's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 145
Default Detroit mpscs

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacombMonitor
Have there been any new developments with the problems associated with receiving Detroit's new digital system on a digital scanner? Has anyone been able to confirm what the problem actually is? Have any of the scanner manufactures responded with any possible solutions? Or is this a dead issue that we'll just have to live with?

Thanks!
You might be right about it being a dead issue because I've offered to help anyone interested in receiving the Detroit system and rather than listing tips and ideas most of the posts are explaining and complaining about why folks can't receive them.
Go figure.

Anywho I have been receiving them fine since they started up this summer and if anyone would like some help just ask.

Here are a couple of tips. Can you receive the data control frequency at least 2 S-units and have you checked to see if you can copy
any of the voice transmitting frequencys on simplex? I think that might be a good start.

I don't get on this group often so if you like please send me an email at
n8chb@wideopenwest.com

73,

Roger
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 02:15 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,313
Default

There really shouldn't be a "trick" to doing so... If you sit in the heart of the city with your handheld and 800MHz antenna, and watch the S go from full to zero without moving a thing, and comms drop out in some neighborhoods and are crystal clear in others - there is nothing you can do. I never have that problem with any non-simulcast MPSCS system.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 04:36 PM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
I never have that problem with any non-simulcast MPSCS system.
Neither do I. However, with Detroit's simulcast system its a real pain in the butt to listen to because of the wild signal strength shifts as mentioned above, in case from S0-S4 in some cases. I would love to be able to listen to DFD crystal clear again.

73's

Ron
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 07:02 PM
n8chb's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt
Neither do I. However, with Detroit's simulcast system its a real pain in the butt to listen to because of the wild signal strength shifts as mentioned above, in case from S0-S4 in some cases. I would love to be able to listen to DFD crystal clear again.

73's

Ron
I'm just replying this one time and then I'll shut up.

First of all what is being described has been a problem for years since folks started putting
radios in cars. Drill a hole through the roof or trunk deck and install a 1/4 wave antenna with some good coax cable next mount a mobile radio (not a hand held piece of junk) to a well grounded metal mount. Next hook the power directly to the battery.

You wont have anymore problems but most folks won't believe it so for them I say wait until the system has an antenna array in every square mile of the city or wait for some new technology to come along.

MERRY CHRISTMAS,


Roger
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 07:37 PM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

N8CHB,

I use a Larsen 7 element yagi at 35 feet with LMR 400 coax with "N" connectors. I can only get about 1-2 s units on the detroit simulcast. If I am in the truck I can not get it at all. SO, it is more than just drilling holes and mounting the antenna. Remember that more are just scanning and whether or not it is perminatly mounted should not matter one way or the other, although all of mine will be perminatly mounted here real soon.

I'll just echo what Rob said a couple of post ago, there definatly is an issue somewhere and Rob is proablay correct that it is in the scanners. However, from reports that I am getting the sub systems and the regular MPSCS are the same.

But the more I think about it Rob is correct, there is something going on that is not allowing the scanners to follow it correctly. If you do monitor Detroit with perfect copy, consider yourself lucky because you are in a great spot, but move around and you probably wont get any copy

If you ask me I think somebody knows something about the subsystems and just does not want to let the cat out of the bag.

Eric
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2005, 09:25 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,313
Default

"First of all what is being described has been a problem for years since folks started putting
radios in cars."

Using both the Pro96 and BCD396T in my car has been absolutely no problem for me when monitoring the Dimondale or Lansing tower - both stationary and moving. Without drilling a hole or adding an external antenna. So unless you can explain what makes monitoring different in Lansing vs Detroit / Monroe / Flint, and not use the phrase "simulcast subsystem" then I think it's not the problem we've had for years with needed a mounted antenna.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2005, 12:42 PM
n8chb's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEMTTP
N8CHB,

I use a Larsen 7 element yagi at 35 feet with LMR 400 coax with "N" connectors. I can only get about 1-2 s units on the detroit simulcast. If I am in the truck I can not get it at all. SO, it is more than just drilling holes and mounting the antenna. Remember that more are just scanning and whether or not it is perminatly mounted should not matter one way or the other, although all of mine will be perminatly mounted here real soon.

I'll just echo what Rob said a couple of post ago, there definatly is an issue somewhere and Rob is proablay correct that it is in the scanners. However, from reports that I am getting the sub systems and the regular MPSCS are the same.

But the more I think about it Rob is correct, there is something going on that is not allowing the scanners to follow it correctly. If you do monitor Detroit with perfect copy, consider yourself lucky because you are in a great spot, but move around and you probably wont get any copy

If you ask me I think somebody knows something about the subsystems and just does not want to let the cat out of the bag.

Eric

Eric my friend yes there is something different but it not a secret,

Things have changed and scanner folks can no longer be appliance operators. One needs to read and understand more
about wave propagation. Each band on the radio spectrum requires different radio and antenna designs to copy.

Then folks might stop comparing one system to an other and know why heavily dense areas are different than others.
Signals above 800MHz act much like a spot light or a lighthouse. They give out a foot print of radio energy in a fine pattern.
They are adjusted horizontally and vertically. Many of the Detroit arrays are tilted down a few degrees.
A great deal of the signal is absorbed, blocked, bounces off solid things and is scattered in unpredicted directions.
If you have lived in the area for a long time this problem was very apparent when channel 50 first went on the air.
Receiving UHF TV has the same characteristics except they radiate a million watts of power at 750 to 1000 feet with
full pattern in all directions using one antenna and in most cases you still need a Yagi to clearly receive the main signal
or you will get multiple ghost images. This is the reason for rapid fluctuations in signal strength seen on a scanner
that receives higher frequencys. A big problem to over come on digital systems that is the radios can not tell
multiple signals of equal strength from true signals.

Many are under the assumption that they don't have any problems receiving other stand alone sites. Well guess what
they are not even aware that in most cases they are missing 1/3 of the transmission because no matter where they
are located one side of the site is directed away from them to serve it's defined area. Real good antennas and preamp
are just one thing needed to overcome this.

A ship out at sea never sees the lighthouse until the light energy is turned his way and if it were tilted down 1 or 2 degrees
he might not see it at all plus the view from the crows nest would be no help. (higher antennas don't always help)
This is clearly why cell phone will not work in airplanes. It's not that they can't it because the ground station antennas don't direct RF up into the air.

I have installed and repaired communications system for many years and am not always very good at explaining how they work
as well as some others can so hopefully some of the things I have said will encourage folks to read some articles that
are written much and better explained than I can. I strongly suggest people read some of them because the hobby has changed.

A word about hand held scanners and portable radios. Most are sold to folks with identity problems with a need to
impress others much like the morons that take laptop computers on airplanes to show how insecure they are.

I apologize if I have offended anyone.

73,

Roger
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2005, 01:37 PM
toydriver_det's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n8chb
.......

A word about hand held scanners and portable radios. Most are sold to folks with identity problems with a need to
impress others much like the morons that take laptop computers on airplanes to show how insecure they are.

I apologize if I have offended anyone.

73,

Roger
A most excellent post until you got to that last part. When I fly I take a laptop. I don't use it in the air but a lot of people that fly all the time have to take a laptop and do a lot of work instead of staring out the window or other nonproductive things. Of course there is always the few that watch movies but even then they are not bothering anyone and watching something they want to see.
And along with radios like my R-7000 at home I have various mobile/portable/handheld radios. Between company trucks, personal cars, a motorscooter, and a motorhome I tend to use portable equipment a lot. GPS, scanner, cellphone, etc. Do most people see this stuff, Nope. For the most part the only time people know I have a scanner is when I want them to know like when I am trading information or talking to someone interested in radio.
I also apologize if I have offended anyone.
__________________
Toydriver
Peace through superior firepower.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2005, 03:09 PM
SEMTTP's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South East Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,172
Send a message via AIM to SEMTTP Send a message via MSN to SEMTTP
Default

Roger,

Excellent Post. perhaps we really need more of that. I know I would be more interested in talking to you more about this. I had a pre-amp once before, perhaps I need to buy another yagi and a pre-amp and point it toward detroit and use my pro96 to see if I can copy it any better. This gives me somthing to do!


Thanks

Eric
__________________
Eric-KB8UYC
Dispatcher for FNNM(fnnm.net)

http://flickr.com/photos/erchambers
http://kb8uyc.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2005, 03:31 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,313
Default

"One needs to read and understand more about wave propagation."

Don't insult others. If you need to do more than slap an 800MHz antenna onto the radio, there's a problem. I've even used the exact same antenna off my W7 and no change in reception for simulcasts.

"Then folks might stop comparing one system to an other and know why heavily dense areas are different than others."

Trust me - Monroe Co is not even close to "heavily" dense. Downtown Lansing would be a location I would expect to get bad MPSCS reception from if your point was valid - but I don't.

"Many are under the assumption that they don't have any problems receiving other stand alone sites."

It's not an assumption, it is true.

"Well guess what they are not even aware that in most cases they are missing 1/3 of the transmission because no matter where they are located one side of the site is directed away from them to serve it's defined area."

Are you serious? That would mean that the users are also missing 1/3rd of their transmissions?

I have my 396 sitting next to my W7, and they both pick up the exact same hits.

In SW Monroe Co I had my 396 sitting next to a handheld Motorola (unsure of the model number) and mine was losing the CC and dropping out audio repeatedly while the Mot was completely fine.

In NW Monroe Co my radio worked fine. My guess is that I'm only getting a good carrier from the Dundee tower, so any slight interference from the others is not impacting like I am thinking it would in other parts of the county.

If you can explain the difference without saying simulcast vs non-simul I will be amazed.

"A word about hand held scanners and portable radios. Most are sold to folks with identity problems with a need to impress others much like the morons that take laptop computers on airplanes to show how insecure they are."

What is that all about? If you think the general public looks at people with handheld scanners and holds them in awe - you haven't been around the general public! And plenty of people do work on laptops - calling them insecure has no basis in fact.

However people that insult other scanner listeners, many who've been doing it for decades, some who probably were even part of the testing for scanner manufacturers is not the way to get "status."

- Rob

Last edited by rdale; 12-23-2005 at 03:33 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:07 PM
n8chb's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 145
Default Detroit and the mpscs system

WOW,

Thanks for the response folks,

Sorry about the sarcastic insulting way I am but most of it was said in anger of being questioned
every time I post something by a small group of people that no one pays any attention to anyway.

I am only suggesting some alternative things to improve scanning rather than harp about and blame
the system and the radios.

My hope is that this group can share some light on finding better ways to deal with receiving some
of the new communications systems out there and better enjoy listening to them.

As far as being annoyed at those who have questioned me in the past I'm going to have to just get over it.
Life is to short to worry about it.

73,

Roger
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:41 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,313
Default

One way of keeping things calm is to never post when angry ;>

You have good points in general, but they do not apply to the simulcast problem in Detroit, Genesee County and Monroe County.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-24-2005, 02:19 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wilmington, OH
Posts: 13
Default

I dispute N8CHB's claim that the problem is simply "poor reception" or "poor antenna installation". My friend from the Detroit EMS service has a portable Motorola radio used by the Detroit Fire Dept and he and I sat in a car at Maple Road and Woodward on Tuesday evening about 8:30 PM. His radio received everything absolutely perfectly with its built-in antenna, while my PRO-96 received the hash garbage and dropouts.

Fred E.
N8UC -- Oak Park
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-24-2005, 02:59 PM
Old4rd's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Genesee Co. Michigan
Posts: 43
Default

TO: N8CHB, I have read all of these (and other) first hand reports and ensuing discussion regarding problems encountered by folks monitoring the simulcast systems of Detroit, Monroe Co. & Genesee County. I'm curious what your results have been in monitoring any of these three digital systems, and which digital scanner you are using?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-2005, 04:05 PM
bear105's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Howard Co, MD
Posts: 358
Send a message via ICQ to bear105 Send a message via AIM to bear105 Send a message via Yahoo to bear105 Send a message via Skype™ to bear105
Default

Hmmm....I am currently in town for the Holidays and have been listening to this system and several Western Wayne MPSCS towers. I am hearing all quite well here in Livonia, including the Detroit simulcast system. I usually only have about 1 bar of SNR but the system seems to be scanning quite well with my BCD396T and the provided rubber ducky. There are some transmission cut-outs but this must be due to the SNR. I haven't tried it mobile though...

Happy Holidays and Good listening!
__________________
Denis Trapp
Elektra Bearcat III/PRO-2006 w/OS456/PRO-96/BCD396T/BCD396XT/BCD996XT
Hosting Online Feed for Howard County, Maryland Police and Fire
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-2005, 05:09 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,290
Default

Interesting discussion. It seems like multipath or phasing distortion has something to do with the problem. Detroit has a double whammy with buildings reflecting signals and simulcast sites present. The text below is from a reference in my archives.

Simulcast: uses multiple sites to extend coverage of the system. Up to 10 sites can be accommodated in a simulcast system. Each remote site has a remote controller and a bank of repeaters with identical frequencies to those at the prime site. A dedicated intersite communications path is needed to carry system information to each site. Typical intersite communications is achieved by using microwave links. Simulcast specifically refers to the simultaneous transmission of identical carrier signals from multiple sites. In a simulcast system the carrier frequency, phase, and transmitter key up times must be tightly controlled.

Sites are synchronized by GPS or wired clock sync. Evidently Motorola radios are more tolerant of phasing distortion than scanners are. Anyone know how many simulcast towers Detroit has?

It might be interesting to map the towers and select a receiving location where one tower is sure to dominate. I don't mean right on top of the tower, but at enough distance so the scanner front end is not swamped by the signal. Add a highly directional Yagi antenna to the test so that signal reflections are reduced. Would reception be solid under those most ideal conditions?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions