Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Michigan Radio Discussion Forum


Michigan Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Michigan.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 08:47 AM
mandlair's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: delaware
Posts: 434
Send a message via Yahoo to mandlair
Default Radio System A Paper Weight?

Hi,all some info for guys and girls. http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/a...WS01/705180320 Mike
__________________
RADIO SHACK PRO-96/RADIO SHACK PRO-2036/RADIO SHACK PRO-197/GRE PSR500/UNIDEN 200XLT/YAESU VX-7R/KENWOOD TM-V7. callsign KB3LZZ
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 09:12 AM
phoneman604's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Central ,IL.
Posts: 30
Default

you would think that the money these towns are spending on this system that it would work,look at kalamazoo they are haveing the same problems,an you also would think that the engineers would find these problems an fix them before fireing up the system an turning it over to the citys
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 01:11 PM
kasparek's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 38
Default

Battle Creek - Encrypted, Kzoo - Encrypted. See a pattern.....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 02:56 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, MI-Barry County(Near G.R. & Ionia)
Posts: 686
Send a message via ICQ to Skud
Default

I listen to Barry County Sheriff and they have almost no trouble except for the MDC's botting them off alot. But not very much going digital. And they are not ENC
__________________
PSR-500 | Pro-96 | BCD996T | PSR-600
Webmaster http://westmichiganscan.com
ID Tracker Website
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 02:59 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, MI-Barry County(Near G.R. & Ionia)
Posts: 686
Send a message via ICQ to Skud
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kasparek
Battle Creek - Encrypted, Kzoo - Encrypted. See a pattern.....
All of Kzoo is not Encrypted. I list to Kzoo sheriff alot. Maybe the Encryption is the problem.
Kzoo Pub safty is the one that uses Encryption full time. I can't say anyone else in Kzoo itself that is fully Encrypted.
Would be interesting to see if they took the encryption out if it would make a difference. I bet not tho
__________________
PSR-500 | Pro-96 | BCD996T | PSR-600
Webmaster http://westmichiganscan.com
ID Tracker Website
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 03:07 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

Encryption isn't an issue, digital is digital whether there is encryption or not.

What gets me is the comment about digital voice sounding better -- not sure what he uses in place of his ears but they aren't real ;>
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2007, 05:08 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 478
Default Digital audio

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
Encryption isn't an issue, digital is digital whether there is encryption or not.

What gets me is the comment about digital voice sounding better -- not sure what he uses in place of his ears but they aren't real ;>
This may be true to someone that has another Moto radio, I don't know. I know that listening with my Pro96, just about everyone has what I call an "underwater" sound. And they can't sound like that on each other's radios, or they would be wah-wahing like crazy.
I've never listened to an actual Moto digital radio, just my scanner.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2007, 05:38 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

No, it's physically impossible to get "better" voice by converting it to digital and back.

I spent plenty of time with a Motorola rig when Lansing was on the system and it never sounded even CLOSE to similar, let alone better.

I've not used ProVoice, but have talked to some that say EDACS digital sounds MUCH better than P25. But still nothing can beat the real thing...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2007, 05:49 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
Encryption isn't an issue, digital is digital whether there is encryption or not.

What gets me is the comment about digital voice sounding better -- not sure what he uses in place of his ears but they aren't real ;>
Guess you have never heard proper radios where there is a weak signal.

P25 definitely sounds better than analog
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2007, 05:58 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

If the signal is weak, usually the P25 decoding causes a dropout. So while you are correct in that the bits and pieces of voice don't have static in them, you are wrong in saying that P25 is better than analog.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2007, 07:19 AM
gg750's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 361
Send a message via AIM to gg750 Send a message via Yahoo to gg750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
If the signal is weak, usually the P25 decoding causes a dropout. So while you are correct in that the bits and pieces of voice don't have static in them, you are wrong in saying that P25 is better than analog.
I think it's wrong of you to say he's wrong for thinking one thing sounds better than another. It's all about one's preference and how one's ears/brain interpret sound waves...everyone is different.

I won't say one sounds better than the other since I don't really care. But I will say that it can often be "clearer" than analog when properly decoded. I've noticed that officers/dispatchers on P25 can often forgo the "Adam Boy Charles" way of spelling out a name since the voice is usually clear enough that ABC works just fine...in most cases. Just my personal opinion...which is probably wrong.

G
__________________
Pro-96
Pro-2096
BC785D
BCT15
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2007, 12:06 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
If the signal is weak, usually the P25 decoding causes a dropout. So while you are correct in that the bits and pieces of voice don't have static in them, you are wrong in saying that P25 is better than analog.
In a properly designed system with good equipment, if P25 is "dropping out", then the analog is usually well below usable.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2007, 03:06 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

All that is nice in theory. I'm in Michigan and was a listener with a Motorola rig for several years. It is not a factor of a person's ears or listening preference, the MPSCS system, which the article is about, does not contain audio as good as analog.

The Ingham Co UHF trunked system has digital audio that sounds MUCH better than P25.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2007, 03:23 PM
fleurycove's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 136
Default

Battle Creek has been using it's OLD ANALOG Station now and then since they have been having this problem. They still use channel #4, (they never stopped using it)
It would of been nice if they just went digital for the city,county & townships and not encrypted. Emmett Township goes by my house 2-4 times a day most every day.
__________________
Greg,

Pro-96
Pro-97
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2007, 05:05 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 705
Send a message via AIM to jparks29 Send a message via MSN to jparks29 Send a message via Yahoo to jparks29
Default

the thing about A Vs. D is very simple......in Digital , it either works, or it doesn't (no voice, machine gunning,dropped packets)..

With Analog, you have a sliding scale if you will, signal has a direct correlation to audio quality...

Think of it as a cellphone.. your '1 bar' conversation sounds the same as your '5 bar' conversation, it's digital..

NOW, think of the old AMPS phones, or a cordless phone, or even 2m or HF... your S1 conversation sounds NOTHING like your S5 conversation...

The problem IS, in an S1 environment, with digital, you're losing packets, possibly not even recieving enough packets to form the data it needs to convert back to voice...whereas with analog , you may be able to pick out bits/pieces and form a cohesive word structure to understand what's being said...

Last edited by jparks29; 05-20-2007 at 05:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2007, 05:33 PM
GreatLakes's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,875
Default

Much of the Motorola hardware being used on MPSCS is not up-to-date on firmware, or even configured properly.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2007, 03:16 PM
gg750's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 361
Send a message via AIM to gg750 Send a message via Yahoo to gg750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
All that is nice in theory. I'm in Michigan and was a listener with a Motorola rig for several years. It is not a factor of a person's ears or listening preference, the MPSCS system, which the article is about, does not contain audio as good as analog.

The Ingham Co UHF trunked system has digital audio that sounds MUCH better than P25.
How are you able to listen to digital TGs in the Ingham EDACS?
__________________
Pro-96
Pro-2096
BC785D
BCT15
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2007, 04:13 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

Not with a scanner.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alameda Contra Costa joint radio system cquirk San Francisco Bay Area Discussion 7 05-10-2007 04:24 PM
Longmont facing major radio decisions jimmnn Colorado Radio Discussion Forum 29 03-23-2007 06:13 PM
Personal Radio Association Membership Drive jwilkers Tavern Archives 13 12-09-2005 01:42 PM
City plans to use new radio system from News 9 prayincowboy Oklahoma Radio Discussion Forum 1 09-18-2005 06:23 PM
State Radio System n4voxgill South Dakota Radio Discussion Forum 3 03-03-2005 11:13 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions