Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Michigan Radio Discussion Forum


Michigan Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Michigan.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:10 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default Monroe Fire Talkgroup Question

I'm monitoring the major fire in Ida on the Dimondale tower although just getting the primary fire talkgroup 2249. A request was made by the IC to have "Fire 2 patched to Emergency Talkgroup 1" because not all the onscene rigs have the new radios.

Dispatch said that they were not setup at this time to do such a patch, and all units could switch to Emergency Talkgroup 1 but that dispatch would no longer be able to monitor. Any idea what Fire 2 is? Or why EMER1 is listed as a talkgroup (2244) but sounds more like a talkaround if dispatch can't monitor?

- Rob
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM
WTFD10's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the Buckeyes meet the Wolverines
Posts: 53
Default

Fire 2 is 154.355

I have been told that Central Dispatch can only monitor the main fire dispatch talkgroup which is channel 1 and 16 on the radios.

Don't know if they don't have the other tg's programmed in their consoles or if the "fire dispatcher" is just too busy also doing LEIN and whatever else to switch channels.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2005, 02:35 PM
MONROEUSER's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 76
Default

The dispatch consoles are not yet set up with all of the talkgroups. As soon as they are the talkgroups can be patched but as of this date the consoles still are not set up to monitor or patch most of the tallgroups. Everything in there is still in the transitional phase and should all be completed in the next 2 to 3 weeks. There is also work being done so dispatch can patch the Monroe 800 system to Toledo and Downriver. All of that should be completed real soon.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2005, 03:00 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

Just seems strange that they would intermix the radios beforehand without the ability to patch things together - it seemed comms were not very easy at the Ida incident.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2005, 04:33 PM
FPO703's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,651
Default

You'd think they'd have dispatch finished before switching to a new radio system, no? That only makes sense.



__________________
Owner: Ohio_MARCS Yahoo Group
Equipment: PRO-96, BCD396T, BC246T, PRO-92, BC235XLT, BC245XLT, PRO-2016.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2005, 04:42 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,298
Default

If I had to guess they were probably doing it partially because they expected coverage problems to pop up (as they did) and didn't want comms to go to nil while fixing... That fire wasn't a typical event for Monroe Co ;>
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2005, 07:17 PM
WTFD10's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Where the Buckeyes meet the Wolverines
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdale
That fire wasn't a typical event for Monroe Co ;>
You win the understatement of the week award
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2005, 07:54 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Default

I've been on the fence as to post a response to this or not, since I try to stay in the background, but here goes. It isn't as easy as just saying today we are going to turn off all the old stuff, and on with all the new stuff.

There are a finite amount of resources that can fit on a console position, and CEB, and a balance must be achieved. The legacy system must still be supported till all the users on it have the capability to use the new system, and there is a comfort level with the reliability of the new system to let go of the old.

When I created the console configs I had to cram 10 lbs of **** into a 5 lb box. So for now there is enough to get by on both systems, and when they are ready and comfortable enough to cut off the old stuff, they will have everything they need.

Is it somewhat of a pain? Yes, I heard the communications chaos, I understand, after all I'm not just one of the tech's but also a FF. I was on standby at Dundee's station, and that's just how it works for the moment. In the very near future things will be good!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions