ARMER Talkgroup 4650

Status
Not open for further replies.

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
That database here lists ARMER Talkgroup 4650 as:

IGH WORKS 2

However, based on listening this morning, that does not seem to be adding up. To me it sounded more like Dakota County HD, Farmington PW, or Lakeville PW. Can anybody here help with this?
 

bernietr

Member
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
101
Location
Burnsville, MN
4650

my notes indacate plowing heard on 4650 12511
Also herd plowiing on 4652 IGH COMM same date but was unable to veriy it was IGH on 4650 at the time
 

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
I heard more traffic this morning on Talkgroup 4650. They made mention of 175th St. and 205th St, which runs through Lakeville. Thus I strongly suspect that this is Lakeville Public Works. This leads me to believe that it should be one of the following:

DK LA PW 1

DK LA PW 2

DK LA COM

I am inclined to say that it is simply DK LA PW 1, since most public works departments seem to just stay on their main talkgroup.
 

mmtstc

Ø
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
861
Location
Minneapolis Area
it doesn't march out that way, and a county like Dakota, marches out...
4616 Apple Valley Public Works 1
4618 Apple Valley Public Works 2
4620 Apple Valley Public Common
4622 Burnsville Public Works 1
4624 Burnsville Public Works 2
4626 Burnsville Public Common
4628 Eagan Public Works 1
4630 Eagan Public Works 2
4632 Eagan Public Common
4634 Empire Township Township 1
4636 Farmington Public Works 1
4638 Farmington Public Works 2
4640 Farmington Public Common
4642 Hastings Public Works 1
4644 Hastings Public Works 2
4646 Hastings Public Common
4648 Inver Grove Heights Public Works 1
4650 Inver Grove Heights Public Works 2
4652 Inver Grove Heights Public Common
4654 Lakeville Public Works 1
4656 Lakeville Public Works 2
4658 Lakeville Public Common
4660 Mendota Heights Public Works 1
4662 Mendota Heights Public Works 2
4664 Mendota Heights Public Common
4666 Rosemount Public Works 1
4668 Rosemount Public Works 2
4670 Rosemount Public Common
4672 South St. Paul Public Works 1
4674 South St. Paul Public Works 2
4676 South St. Paul Public Common
4678 West St. Paul Public Works 1
4680 West St. Paul Public Works 2
4682 West St. Paul Public Common
 

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
I have monitored more traffic on this talkgroup this morning. This is definitely NOT Inver Grove Heights Public Works. As I suspected from earlier traffic, they are talking about plowing operations and the locations given, such as Dodd Blvd and Flagstaff, are clearly Lakeville.
 

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
I am hearing a lot of traffic on this again today. All of the traffic is consistent with Lakeville Public Works. What is the best way to get this corrected on the database?
 

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
Are there any other anomolies in the other IGH talkgroups ?

4648 Inver Grove Heights Public Works 1 < Do they use this one in IGH ?

4652 Inver Grove Heights Public Common
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
27
Location
Woodbury, MN
The correct layout is this

4648 Inver Grove Heights Public Works Common
4650 Lakeville Public Works Common
4652 Lakeville Public Works S1
4654 Lakeville Public Works S2
4656 Lakeville Public Works U1
4658 Lakeville Public Works U2

Don't know what the S and U stand for
 

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
.....Don't know what the S and U stand for.....

My vote is for "Streets" and "Utilities".

http://www.ci.lakeville.mn.us/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=42&Itemid=416

It does also make me wonder if any of the other cities in Dakota County have a similar public works talkgroups lineup beyond the usual:

DK XX PW 1

DK XX PW 2

DK XX COM

Certainly cities like Burnsville and Eagan might be worth listening to a bit closer just to make sure that the radio traffic being monitored matches up to the talkgroup name.
 
Last edited:

NDRADIONUT

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,952
Location
FARGO ND
DOES EVERYONE AGREE THIS IS CORRECT BEFORE I ADJUST THE DB ?
ALSO THAT LEAVES IGH WITH NO TALKGROUPS ???

The correct layout is this

4648 Inver Grove Heights Public Works Common
4650 Lakeville Public Works Common
4652 Lakeville Public Works S1
4654 Lakeville Public Works S2
4656 Lakeville Public Works U1
4658 Lakeville Public Works U2

Don't know what the S and U stand for
 
Last edited:

stmills

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,108
Location
Twin Cites Area MN
S is streets, U is utilities
Is IGH still using UHF 453.4250 for there streets dept, I know in Hennepin county some cities stayed on conventional for DPW. I checks the IGH license for 453.4250 and it is nb and the contact number is for the streets dept, I can get some static on it at my location but can not get enough signal to confirm who it is.
 

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
.....ALSO THAT LEAVES IGH WITH NO TALKGROUPS ???.....

I will do some more listening. Even if Inver Grove Heights is still using 453.425, they would still have talkgroups allocated on ARMER. They seemed to allocate them alphabetically by city name, so it is possible that Inver Grove Heights is actually:


4644 DK IG PW 1
4646 DK IG PW 2
4648 DK IG COM
 

JASII

Memory Capacity
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
2,997
Talkgroup 4666 was just active and there is no doubt in my mind that it is:

DK RS PW1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top