Considering the situation, its no wonder he didn't give you a hard time. The priority isn't enforcing a silly ordinance violation, its hunting down these 2 suspects that did who knows what. If it got the attention of multiple agencies and they were setting up checkpoints you can rest assure it was along the lines of a robbery or murder.
That being said, checkpoints are also setup for things like dwi's, people driving without insurance, people driving without a valid license, etc. In those instances the priority is typically to write as many tickets as possible and thus you would get the 20 questions over a scanner, or be required to prove why you can lawfully have it in that jurisdiction.
This is however a good instance of a law enforcement officer doing what most would say is "his job" by not hassling you over something petty and remaining focused on the bigger issue at hand, finding these suspects.
I just wouldn't want anyone who isn't "lawfully" in possession of a scanner in that jurisdiction to read this and think that they can get away with it all the time, with no worry of being questioned about it or being required to show a fcc license.
|