Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > MPT-1327 and TETRA Forum


MPT-1327 and TETRA Forum For general discussion of MPT-1327 and TETRA Trunking Technologies

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2006, 12:38 PM
pyeman99's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 86
Default Trunkview 1.3 with Icom PCR-*

I had trouble get Trunkview to control the radio.By default the com port of a PCR runs at 38400.So I wrongly set Trunview to this.Resetting to 9600 fixed the problem.
It also takes quite a bit of working out with a calculator to get the correct setting for offset,base freq etc.I now have some info that works ok for Mid Band (162 to 165) systems for UK if anyone does get stuck.
Still some to learn but looks like a good program.
Keith.UK.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2006, 01:38 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyeman99
I had trouble get Trunkview to control the radio.By default the com port of a PCR runs at 38400.So I wrongly set Trunview to this.Resetting to 9600 fixed the problem.
It also takes quite a bit of working out with a calculator to get the correct setting for offset,base freq etc.I now have some info that works ok for Mid Band (162 to 165) systems for UK if anyone does get stuck.
Still some to learn but looks like a good program.
Keith.UK.
Trunkview should set the comms on the PC-R100/PC-R1000 when it initialises so that should not be a problem?
Offset can be left at 2 and never altered (it's a legacy of the original linux software and will be removed in a future version of TrunkView to prevent the confusion it causes!). One thing less to worry about when you are playing with your calculator then

Several systems documented on the TrunkView yahoo list:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trunkview

If people get stuck it's better to explain what to do rather than spoon-feed them the settings for a system.
There is a page on the Trunkview website (http://www.linato.net/trunkview/ ) which explains, fairly clearly, how to work out the base frequency for a system with a logical channel plan.
TrunkView will not track systems that use a custom channel plan.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2006, 02:42 PM
pyeman99's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by morfis
Trunkview should set the comms on the PC-R100/PC-R1000 when it initialises so that should not be a problem?
Offset can be left at 2 and never altered (it's a legacy of the original linux software and will be removed in a future version of TrunkView to prevent the confusion it causes!). One thing less to worry about when you are playing with your calculator then

Several systems documented on the TrunkView yahoo list:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trunkview

If people get stuck it's better to explain what to do rather than spoon-feed them the settings for a system.
There is a page on the Trunkview website (http://www.linato.net/trunkview/ ) which explains, fairly clearly, how to work out the base frequency for a system with a logical channel plan.
TrunkView will not track systems that use a custom channel plan.
Thanks for the info.I did see the Trunkview site with it's version history which helps.
1 problem we have in UK is that the spectrum has been tweaked.I do tend to agree with the spoon feeding but a little help does not hurt.If people can't get it to go from the box then the software gets a bad name.Regards Keith.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2006, 05:06 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyeman99
Thanks for the info.I did see the Trunkview site with it's version history which helps.
1 problem we have in UK is that the spectrum has been tweaked.I do tend to agree with the spoon feeding but a little help does not hurt.If people can't get it to go from the box then the software gets a bad name.Regards Keith.
What do you mean "the spectrum has been tweaked"? What is the problem you are refering to?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006, 01:34 PM
pyeman99's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by morfis
What do you mean "the spectrum has been tweaked"? What is the problem you are refering to?
Mid band edges were changed but this info does not get into print.Well not to most people & not on any scanning group I have seen.Extra channels were released,some time ago now.Many publish band plans are just not up to date.Getting info from OFCOM is not like getting info from FCC.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006, 06:02 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyeman99
Mid band edges were changed but this info does not get into print.Well not to most people & not on any scanning group I have seen.Extra channels were released,some time ago now.Many publish band plans are just not up to date.Getting info from OFCOM is not like getting info from FCC.
Guess you're not talking about TrunkView or MPT1327 when you refer to your "problem". Offcom are actually very good at notifying changes to bands well in advance.

Some of the frequency info is available in the WTR and ITU databases etc. This will never replace good old-fashioned searching/listening to identify users though. It's not difficult to recognise MPT1327 control channels.

Most UK scanner groups seem to be obsessed with: police, council gritters and shopwatch schemes...but this is getting off topic.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Icom PCR 2500 IF Output? kb1ipd ICOM Receivers 4 04-16-2009 08:24 PM
FS/ Icom PCR 1000 With DSP Plus a 2022 primus6 Old Classifieds Archives 1 02-02-2008 03:11 PM
WTB win-radio or icom pcr 100 or 1000 quickshooter45 Old Classifieds Archives 0 10-22-2006 06:29 PM
Like New Icom PCR 1000 With DSP for sale primus6 Old Classifieds Archives 7 08-17-2006 07:54 PM
Icom America Wins Large U.S. Army Order for New Radios n9nwo General Scanning Forum 8 05-02-2005 12:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions