RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > New Jersey Radio Discussion Forum


New Jersey Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of New Jersey.

View Poll Results: Should the three NJSP TSYS entries by combined into one?
Yes - it will make much easier to find talkgroups and web import the entire state system. 24 66.67%
No, keep them seperated because combining them will only cause problems. 12 33.33%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2009, 08:31 PM
Septa3371CSX1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lansdowne, PA
Posts: 257
Send a message via AIM to Septa3371CSX1 Send a message via Yahoo to Septa3371CSX1
Lightbulb Merging NJSP Database Entries Into 1

I don't know if this has come up before or not but if it has forgive me for bringing it back up in a new topic.

Anyways, I'm offering a suggestion with a poll on whether or not the three NJSP Trunk System DB entries should be combined into one. The main reason I ask is because all three systems are linked together and many talkgroups are broadcast on two or three systems. So rather than having seperate entries for A, B, and C, why not have 1 entry for the whole state and have the frequencies grouped into the three seperate troops along with the intellipeater sites and list all the system IDs (i.e. Troop A, SysID B106). Then have all the talkgroups listed with the patrol talkgroups seperated by troop (A, B, C). This will elminate the need to have the talkgroups that are broadcast on two or three systems entered in three seperate entries and also make it easier for users to look up talkgroups that for example, pop up on A but are only listed on C.

Both John Burcelli (KC2KZZ's files) and Joe Cardini (Philly Scanner) have their files for NJSP listed with the frequencies listed for each system and all the talk groups listed as one rather than 3 seperate lists for each troops. It is much easier to use those files than the Radio Reference DB listings because everything is in one place. While not to steal traffic from them, I feel since RR is the most well known internet site for scanner users, everything should be easy to use and understand. Before I found Nosoup4u's files, I struggled with talkgroups on the NJSP systems using the RR entries.

Another issue that will come up with combining these systems is users who only want to program one troop and also web imports. Combining all the systems into one will make it much easier to use the web import feature on programs like Win500 since all talkgroups can be imported once instead of three times and then going through and affiliating everything with the NJSP TSYS object and also making sure you have all the control channel frequencies. At the same time, users who only want Troop B for example can still just program Troop B and it's talkgroups by selecting those that affiliate with the B system.

Please discuss this suggestion and use the poll to voice your opinion on the subject matter.
__________________
Joe Butler
Scanning the Delaware Valley with a Pro 97, a Pro 106, and a Pro 2055!
Septa3371CSX1@aol.com
Victory5318@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2009, 09:11 PM
Highpockets's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 1,576
Default

I won't vote yet, I want to read some other replies, but, In John's and not sure about Joe's the talk groups are in one list. They are labeled by troop, example:

A1-15 Bass River 26960
B2-15 Bloomfield 26928
C3-15 Sayreville 53296

And the system wide talk groups are marked together:

A4/B5/C6-6 SouthStar 26800
A4/B5/C6-7 NorthStar 26832

Will it make it easier to figure out or not, putting them all together might make a long list. I hope others chime in! I have to give it more thought!
__________________
Steve
BC780xlt ~ BC785D ~ BCD996XT ~ PSR600

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:18 AM
Septa3371CSX1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lansdowne, PA
Posts: 257
Send a message via AIM to Septa3371CSX1 Send a message via Yahoo to Septa3371CSX1
Default

That's exactly how I'm suggesting it be combined together. John's file lists them with the actual alpha tags (A1-2, B2-4, C3-3, etc) used on the system. I understand it will make a long list but there are other statewide trunk systems in the database that have long lists as well.
__________________
Joe Butler
Scanning the Delaware Valley with a Pro 97, a Pro 106, and a Pro 2055!
Septa3371CSX1@aol.com
Victory5318@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:34 AM
JBuff27's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default

WHY is only Troop A, B, and C listed in the present listings?

Where is Troops C and D listed?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:52 AM
W2SJW's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,081
Send a message via AIM to W2SJW
Default

I've been stewing on this one for a couple of months - I think it should be done as well. I'm willing to do a fair amount of the work, but I dare not take that kind of job on solo.

Any other NJ database admin willing to work on this if we decide to do it?
__________________
Scott

XTS 5000R VHF | XTS 5000R UHF |BCD-396XT
ICOM IC-7000 | ICOM ID-880H (x2) | ICOM IC-92AD
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:06 AM
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBuff27 View Post
WHY is only Troop A, B, and C listed in the present listings?

Where is Troops C and D listed?
Troops D and E are in the current listings, they piggy-back on the systems built for Troops A-C. They do have separate talkgroups, but do not have separate trunked systems.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:34 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cumberland Co., NJ
Posts: 202
Default

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

How would that work with the newer radios that have sites? Enter everything 3 times? Not clear on that . I do agree the A-1, B-2 and C-3 lables need to be put back in so you know the troop talking.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:38 AM
Highpockets's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 1,576
Default

I see pros and cons in this, I for one don't use the import feature, I like to enter mine by hand and put my own alpha tags, the 12 characters supplied on RR just doesn't do it for me. Example:

B2-15 BlmFld (12)
B2-15 Bloomfield (16)

I agree with you Scott, it will be some job!
__________________
Steve
BC780xlt ~ BC785D ~ BCD996XT ~ PSR600

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:57 AM
robertpearsall's Avatar
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 172
Default

I would like to see this done as i have all 3 systems in my bct15.I was thinking of merging all 3 but dont know how i would set it up what freqs or what system to make the main
__________________
Robert

Motorola XTS2500 UHF
Uniden BCT15 x2
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 12:19 PM
Member
 
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 566
Default

I'm all for merging them as long as a SysID search in the database for any of the three would get you this merged system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpearsall View Post
I was thinking of merging all 3 but dont know how i would set it up what freqs or what system to make the main
Beware: one difficulty with programming them into a scanner as one system is that there is a NYC-area trunked system which shares a control channel frequency with Troop A. Anytime I go within range of it I have to either turn off the wildcards or remove that particular Troop A control channel from my programming. I think, but am not sure, that there are few or no overlapping TGIDs between the two systems so as long as you're not searching you should be okay..
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 03:45 PM
Septa3371CSX1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lansdowne, PA
Posts: 257
Send a message via AIM to Septa3371CSX1 Send a message via Yahoo to Septa3371CSX1
Default

Also, Vineland, NJ's trunked system uses control channels from Troop B and the south site of the DRPA EDACS system also uses some Troop B control channels. So beware.
__________________
Joe Butler
Scanning the Delaware Valley with a Pro 97, a Pro 106, and a Pro 2055!
Septa3371CSX1@aol.com
Victory5318@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:18 PM
Audiodave1's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 39.79N -75.54W
Posts: 1,309
Default

Thinking of the people traveling to the area who import systems I'm not sure this is a good idea but that's just me.

The locals know the layout and which TG's belong to which troop but how about the visitors or new listeners?

I do agree that a fair number of TG's cross over into 2 systems at any given time ( WEll, GSP and TPK always do but...)

Just my .02
Dave
__________________
If bad sound were fatal Audio would be the leading cause of death!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2009, 06:53 PM
Septa3371CSX1's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lansdowne, PA
Posts: 257
Send a message via AIM to Septa3371CSX1 Send a message via Yahoo to Septa3371CSX1
Default

Bump! Seems like those who voted feel for the most part the combination should be done. Keep voting everyone - poll will be closed at my or the moderators' discretion once enough time has elapsed.
__________________
Joe Butler
Scanning the Delaware Valley with a Pro 97, a Pro 106, and a Pro 2055!
Septa3371CSX1@aol.com
Victory5318@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2009, 08:31 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Delran, NJ
Posts: 36
Send a message via AIM to rcbarry
Default

Mine is merged, example

State Police - C
South Star

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:13 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: East Windsor NJ
Posts: 23
Send a message via ICQ to kd2pm Send a message via AIM to kd2pm Send a message via MSN to kd2pm Send a message via Yahoo to kd2pm
Default

Since I have the PSR500 it would be a benefit to be able to download the TGs into one system on the scanner and then have the 12 CC's listed for that system and would make it easier to roam. Yes there are overlapping issues with NYC and I have had that happen to me. In that case I have a separate system built with B/C and exclude A when I am more north. Cut and paste is a wonderful thing. With NJSP being Omnizone/Omnilink, the talkgroups per division is no longer necessary and we should look at it as a "statewide" system now versus 3 (or 5) separate agencies in 3 systems.
__________________
Ed Velez
kd2pm2@comcast.net
KD2PM - Ham
WPVJ796 - GMRS
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:19 AM
Tac-1's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rahway NJ
Posts: 222
Default

I have Pro-197 (PSR600) and I have merged all 3 systems A-B-C into one system i put the TRS mode into Stat with check all CC on and it works great i get B & C with no problem only need to have 1 channel entered for Tgs on mutiple systems, note im not in range of Div A the A control channels show NYC 800 DOITT but there are no dupilcate TGs NJSP & Doitt so far and i have just about every NJSP TG programed i also programed NJ transit control channel into the system and it works also so i have 5 TRS systems merged into 1 TSYS,(DIV A,B,C, NJT, Doitt) note you can also program the system for Roam mode which will lock onto the strongest control channel its finds in my case in locks onto Div B in Stat mode in monitors all systems. this type of setup is great for people who travel around the state and those of us that are in range of more then one Division dont known if uniden has theses TRS modes Roam & Stat
__________________
TAC-1
-------------
PRO-197

Last edited by Tac-1; 06-30-2009 at 11:22 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:16 PM
W2SJW's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,081
Send a message via AIM to W2SJW
Default

Well, after my poll being up for a good couple of weeks, I can see by almost a 2-to-1 margin that people want it merged. So far, I've come up with a rough estimate as to how to classify the talkgroups. It goes something like this:

Troop A South
Troop B North
Troop C Central
Statewide NJSP Operations
Toll Road Patrols (many I know lock these out now and then - way too much radio traffic).
EMS & Hospital Ops (this would include the MedEvac talkgroups)
Attorney General Ops
Special Investigative Unit (Camden & Irvington Units)
DRJTBC Operations
Human Services Operations (including DCF & DYFS)
NJ Task Force 1
NJ National Guard
Inter-Agency Operations (StateCom & others)
NJDOC
NJDOT
Outside Agencies (NJ Park PD, DCA, NJSPCA, etc...).

This just about mirrors what I have set up in my 396XT - I keep the toll roads, DOC, & DOT locked out unless something interesting is going on.

Last Friday, I noticed more traffic on the IMART talkgroups than I've ever heard before...
__________________
Scott

XTS 5000R VHF | XTS 5000R UHF |BCD-396XT
ICOM IC-7000 | ICOM ID-880H (x2) | ICOM IC-92AD
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:22 PM
Audiodave1's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 39.79N -75.54W
Posts: 1,309
Default

That's a pretty good layout from my perspective.

Dave
__________________
If bad sound were fatal Audio would be the leading cause of death!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 04:03 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: So.Jersey
Posts: 258
Default

When will this be done??
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 04:15 PM
W2SJW's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,081
Send a message via AIM to W2SJW
Default

I'll give my classic response:

When I have time!

I need to build this up in 'staged' mode before I even think about pushing this out 'for real'. The fact that most of the current 3 systems are listed in ALL CAPS drives me nuts, and means that I won't be cutting any corners by doing a 'copy & paste' maneuver...
__________________
Scott

XTS 5000R VHF | XTS 5000R UHF |BCD-396XT
ICOM IC-7000 | ICOM ID-880H (x2) | ICOM IC-92AD
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
db suggestions, njsp

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We Need Updated and New Database Information for California hotdjdave California Radio Discussion Forum 250 03-14-2010 06:28 AM
Overhauling a Database... Randmaster Alabama Radio Discussion Forum 0 05-13-2009 11:40 AM
Radio Reference Database >>> Database Program ??? bigcheez69 General Scanning Forum 5 06-30-2006 03:03 PM
Digital Modulation as Database key in trunked database? b52hbuff System-wide Administration 7 06-13-2004 09:06 PM
New Database Search Available blantonl System-wide Administration 0 05-16-2004 05:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions